Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Tubes / Valves
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 5th August 2008, 05:44 AM   #61
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Yup , you're right. My bad. I was out to full course dinner. Got sucked in by an attitude and took the bait.
I know the circuit , I've actually built one (the topology) . . . and it works ! As soon as I posted I started wishing there was a delete function here. Thanks Sheldon.
  Reply With Quote
Old 5th August 2008, 07:54 AM   #62
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Sheldon, Sorry for the mess here. Still learning how to work with the forum's functions, I wanted to edit my post above but haven't figured out how to do it yet.

Anyway, I agree with you that I was wrong . Part of my clumsiness above comes from the fact that I didn't see the inductors as cathode bias elements. They aren't in series with the cathodes of the stages they get bias voltage for so don't carry their DC current.
The way it looks to me is, by referencing the local ground of the upper circuit to the B+ of the circuit below it, the drop across the choke acts as a grid bias , not a cathode one. But as you say, the inductor and diode are working together to get the full bias needed.

How's that?
  Reply With Quote
Old 5th August 2008, 06:52 PM   #63
Sheldon is offline Sheldon  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: San Diego
Quote:
Originally posted by Hearinspace
Sheldon, Sorry for the mess here. Still learning how to work with the forum's functions, I wanted to edit my post above but haven't figured out how to do it yet.

Anyway, I agree with you that I was wrong . Part of my clumsiness above comes from the fact that I didn't see the inductors as cathode bias elements. They aren't in series with the cathodes of the stages they get bias voltage for so don't carry their DC current.
The way it looks to me is, by referencing the local ground of the upper circuit to the B+ of the circuit below it, the drop across the choke acts as a grid bias , not a cathode one. But as you say, the inductor and diode are working together to get the full bias needed.

How's that?
No worries, and no apologies necessary. A little "edit" button appears at the bottom of a new post, for the poster. Just click on that and you can edit. It goes away after some time between minutes and maybe an hour, so you can't edit after that. But before that you can edit or delete the post.

Just to summarize the bias elements for clarity's sake:

The diode provides portion of the bias. It's dynamic resistance is lower than it's static resistance, so it acts like regular cathode bias, with a portion of the resistance bypassed. The current from the diode is returned to the supply common for the supply for that section.

At DC, the inductor acts like part of a fixed bias supply. The current from the section supply for the tube beneath the inductor goes through the inductor and creates a voltage drop across it. Since the grid is connected across the diode and the inductor, that voltage differential is added to the bias.

However, and I think this is the main point, the inductor is in the AC grid/cathode loop. It's influence will depend on the bypassing on one side, and variations in plate voltage at the other. I can't make a value judgement on it good or bad, just something to account for.

Sheldon
  Reply With Quote
Old 6th August 2008, 08:06 AM   #64
diyAudio Member
 
Larry Lomax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: London Hammersmith
Quote:
Originally posted by Hearinspace
I'll just toss on a couple more briquettes. Hope you don't mind some opinionated rants from an old fart on the other side of the boat.

First, if you haven't built anything then it might be a really good idea to build a well documented kit. I'm saying this in regard to getting a physical experience and feel for good practice in terms of design, layout, construction and safety. Many experienced builders liked studying the old military electronics manuals and one good reason why is that they never put a bunch of stuff in a lesson that wasn't essential to learning the lesson they were trying to teach, so you don't get overloaded with indigestible details . . . . CUT

Well, my intention was to write allmost the same... word by word...
Please, ponder on these hints... are good advice...
__________________
Nothing happens by itself, you have to work hard to arrange things to make it happen.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Wilson Watt Puppy Clone Design - Design Review Please soundengine355 Multi-Way 8 15th August 2008 02:07 PM
4th order bandpass, wheel well design :) (design inside) TWOJZ Car Audio 28 13th January 2008 02:56 PM
Baffle simplicity yields sonic dipole benefit? rick57 Planars & Exotics 19 6th October 2006 12:25 PM
'Best' cost/simplicity/performance 10 W Single Ended Class A npr Pass Labs 2 25th September 2006 09:48 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 08:17 AM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2013 DragonByte Technologies Ltd. (Resources saved on this page: MySQL 30.00%)
Copyright ©1999-2013 diyAudio