Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Tubes / Valves
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum

diyAudio Sponsor

Search for a tube at thetubestore.com                            Product reviews and more

Audio tubes for any amplifier: from high end home audio to classic guitar amps.

Quick links by tube type: 12AX7, EL34, 6L6, KT66, 6550, KT88, EL84, 12AU7, 12AT7, 6922, 6H30, 300B, 6V6, 6SN7 

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 16th June 2008, 10:50 PM   #1
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Indiana
Default 6JU8A Spec confusion

I am not sure I understand the current specifications on the 6JU8A quad diode. The Data Sheet says "Steady State Peak current" = 54mA and DC Output Current" = 9mA. Now to me steady state peak is an oxymoron. If it is steady state then there is no peak and it should mean the same thing as DC output current.

So the only thing I can figure is that the peak current of a steady state sine wave can be up to 54mA instantaneous current and the filtered DC output from the filtering network can be a maximum of 9mA. Is that the correct interpretation?

mike
  Reply With Quote
Old 17th June 2008, 12:19 AM   #2
anatech is offline anatech  Canada
diyAudio Moderator
 
anatech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Georgetown, On
Hi Mike,
My guess would be close to yours.

Peak capacitor charging current is much larger than the peak value of an RMS sine wave figure. I suspect that they are referring to the peak charging current due to the way a capacitor is charged through a rectifier (this tube). The 9mA figure would be the steady state DC current you could draw from this tube as an absolute maximum.

How is that for an explanation?


-Chris
__________________
"Just because you can, doesn't mean you should" © my Wife
  Reply With Quote
Old 17th June 2008, 12:33 AM   #3
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Plainsboro, NJ
Mike,

If you want to bridge rectify a low current and modest voltage B+ rail, you would (IMO) be better off to employ a hybrid bridge made from 2X UF4007s and a 6AL5. The hybrid sounds every bit as good as the full vacuum bridge, while avoiding the unpleasant doubled forward voltage drop.
__________________
Eli D.
  Reply With Quote
Old 17th June 2008, 01:55 AM   #4
anatech is offline anatech  Canada
diyAudio Moderator
 
anatech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Georgetown, On
Hi Eli,
I don't think he is rectifying for a supply. Could be wrong though.

BTW, I have had very good results by adding series resistance to a rectifiers. I use normal recovery types as there is less noise. I have tried the UF4007 types and now I simply use 1N4007s.

-Chris
__________________
"Just because you can, doesn't mean you should" © my Wife
  Reply With Quote
Old 17th June 2008, 10:32 AM   #5
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Indiana
Not building anything with it right now. I am just going through the data sheets for the batch of tubes I just acquired and wanted to be sure I understood the operating limits. A bridge is just the first possible application to come to mind with a IDH quad diode. Voltage drop is only 10V per diode. Other applications my come to mind later and I have enough projects for a few months already anyway.

I appreciate the guidance.

mike
  Reply With Quote
Old 17th June 2008, 02:29 PM   #6
diyAudio Member
 
pmillett's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Dallas (but I am not a Texan!)
Default Re: 6JU8A Spec confusion

Quote:
Originally posted by mashaffer
Is that the correct interpretation?mike
In a word, yes.

Some data sheets call this "Maximum repetitive peak current", which makes a little more sense.

Some datasheets also list another peak current, which is a "surge" peak current, non-repetitive.

Pete
  Reply With Quote
Old 18th June 2008, 12:50 AM   #7
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Indiana
Hmm... a passing glance at Steve Bench's site reminded me of another potential use of dampers. Cathode bias. I know LEDs are cheaper but there is a certain cool factor here.

mike
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Anyone ever use any Mil-Spec RG-142 ? Wardsweb Parts 12 9th March 2011 01:33 PM
CDM 12.4 spec billr Digital Source 0 10th January 2007 07:12 AM
mox confusion cowanrg Solid State 10 9th August 2005 11:11 AM
More(l) confusion mr_push_pull Multi-Way 2 29th May 2005 04:54 PM
I2S confusion MWP Digital Source 2 9th November 2002 10:36 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 04:54 AM.

Page generated in 0.08588 seconds (77.96% PHP - 22.04% MySQL) with 10 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio