|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum |
| diyAudio Sponsor | ||
|
|
||
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Montreal, Qc
|
A lot of schematics say either el34 or kt88 can be used. is this true for all amps using either tube? also what about the 6550?
For example, my guitar amp uses 2 el34's. Can I plop 2 6550's in there place with no problems or does it totally depend on the circuit. (Thats not really what I want to do, but I am very curious about it). The real reason im asking is Im looking for a fairly simple amp project to use 2 6550's for power and hopefully 2 6dj8's for pre. This will be my first high voltage amp as I've already built a few lower voltage "hybrid" amps. |
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: South Florida
|
Quote:
These tubes bias up differently also. In many amp designs one tube may draw quite a bit more plate current than another without readjusting the bias. The optimum load impedance will also be different for each tube. It is possible that swapping tubes in an amplifier not designed for the swap could cause instability and possible damage. It is possible to design an amplifier that works with all three tubes, but this is not always the case. I routinely swap between a 6L6GC, an EL34, a KT88 and the 6550 tubes in my SimpleSE amp, but the amp was designed with a higher than "normal" load impedance and the operating point chosen to work with all 4 tubes.
__________________
Too much power is almost enough! Turn it up till it explodes - then back up just a little. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Account disabled at member's request
Join Date: Jan 2006
|
Quote:
EEKKKKKK! Are they reasonably consistent from a single manufacturer though? (i.e. series connected filaments). |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Jakarta
|
Another reason why it can be wrong to use beam tetrodes (e.g. 6550, KT88) in an amp designed for pentodes (e.g. EL34) is that pentodes tolerate a much higher grid-ground resistance than beam tubes. A high value of grid-ground resistance makes pentodes easier to drive but with beam tubes it can cause the bias to be unstable, leading to plate current runaway and damage.
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Alps:Tube amp designs over 150W, SMPS guru.
|
Quote:
When using Svet 6550C's into KT88 sockets these will show roughly 10-15% less quies in fixed bias. However there are large variables within this tube group. By and large, poke for poke will be similiar.-A caveat is the grid leak resistor, modern 6550c's can use same values as for KT88 but the earlier NOS 6550A suggests 50K max.That will load the driver stage into producing more thd. EL34's driving into a o/p load fit for KT88's will give poor upper audio b/w power (10Khz square wave shape suggests non optimum Z). Bear in mind.. pin 1 on EL34's is g3 and others is shield grnd. In addition, the 6550 group in UL mode is tailored for 470V B+ max working whereas the 88's can rip over 500V. For lower voltages, the 6550 can provide the same performance as the KT88 at signifigantly lower cost. richj |
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| KT88 and the 6550 | duderduderini | Tubes / Valves | 56 | 28th October 2008 04:47 AM |
| Consonance Ella Diy hifi supply, el34, 6550 or KT88? | OzMikeH | Tubes / Valves | 16 | 24th February 2008 12:04 PM |
| High power P-P EL34/6550/KT88 amp suggestions | RenegadeAmps | Tubes / Valves | 5 | 14th September 2006 10:28 AM |
| KT88 or 6550? | castlesteve | Tubes / Valves | 3 | 7th June 2005 10:27 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.08407 seconds (84.17% PHP - 15.83% MySQL) with 10 queries |