300B PP ph.split - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Tubes / Valves

Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 7th February 2008, 05:24 PM   #1
diyAudio Member
 
Gold_xyz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Italy
Default 300B PP ph.split

Hi to all,

I have tried to decipher the value of the components, but (for me)
it is almost impossible.

http://www.plitron.com/pdf/kobayashi1862.pdf

some idea ?
__________________
My English originates from here
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th February 2008, 07:52 PM   #2
JLH is offline JLH  United States
diyAudio Member
 
JLH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Indianapolis, IN
I cannot make out the values either.

Now, just my own personal opinion, but I would use a transformer phase spliter if it was me. I have found the more simple the signal chain, the better the sonic results. However, if you really like that schematic, go for it.

Rgs, JLH
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th February 2008, 08:24 PM   #3
Yvesm is offline Yvesm  France
diyAudio Member
 
Yvesm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Ardeche
IMHO,

Use a center tapped tarnsformer at the input of the amp, then drive a differential gain stage.

The input transformer has almost no power to transfer nor DC current to flow thru

Best is no transformer at all

Yves.
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th February 2008, 08:45 PM   #4
smbrown is offline smbrown  United States
diyAudio Member
 
smbrown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Portland, OR
I've used a Lundall phase splitter at the front end of a PP 300B amp (LL1676??) and I didn't like it except with a low impedeance TVC. I think the output impedance of the preamp becomes a significant issue (see Lynn Olsen's notes re: Karna amp and others). As another track, I've also used the Magnequest SETH amp autotransformer splitter and liked it. Sound was great, sensitive to placement around other mag fields, but otherwise good. My best PP 300B has been done using the kind of circuit Allen Wright uses in his PP1 amp. See Vacuum State Electronics schematic section for more on this. Oh, and I've also tried a Williamson style front end (sans feedback), it was okay. I auditioned that amp at the last VSAC (2003?) and it was well received in the craftsman room. So, overall, PP1 is tops, followed by the MQ autoformer (pps style), then the Williamson, last was the Lundall input transformer. Of course, YMMV!
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th February 2008, 08:53 PM   #5
diyAudio Member
 
Miles Prower's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: USA
Blog Entries: 6
"Best is no transformer at all "

Absatively! This is one of the few 300B designs I've seen where there is adequate grid drive. Inadequate grid drive is, I believe, a big part of the problem of disappointing performance from this particular VT. This aspect is well done, although I do question the benefit of having a BW that could make this serve as a longwave RF amp.

Why they went to all that bother and used the sh!tt!st possible phase splitter is beyond my comprehension. The paraphase just plain SUX, and would be suitable for a quick 'n' dirty design where you weren't particularly concerned with fidelity, as in the audio out of a SW xcvr, ferinstance. The article complains of excessive gain. So the phase splitter should have been an LTP with active tail load. That would be a vast improvement.
__________________
There are no foxes in atheistholes
www.dolphin-hsl.com
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th February 2008, 11:23 PM   #6
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
I agree that the paraphase gives way too much gain for this application. Great square waves though! Still, I'd personally wrap a big negative feedback loop around that amp to increase the 1.7 damping factor and reduce the distortion a bit.
  Reply With Quote
Old 8th February 2008, 05:17 AM   #7
diyAudio Member
 
Miles Prower's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: USA
Blog Entries: 6
^^^^

I definitely believe that gNFB is a good thing. I don't know how big the feedback loop would have to be. Too much tends to make for a "solid statey", "Big Box store" sound. I went with hollow state to get away from that.
__________________
There are no foxes in atheistholes
www.dolphin-hsl.com
  Reply With Quote
Old 8th February 2008, 04:11 PM   #8
diyAudio Member
 
Shoog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Eire
I second the advise to consider a center tapped choke. This produces a very clean direct sound.

I have to disagree with Miles on this. All the theory says that a transformer shouldn't work but when you actually plug one into the right circuit they sound like nothing else. Also why go to the trouble of using some of the most linear valves available and then kill their signature by wrapping large amounts of negative feedback round them. Build with KT88's if that your philosphy. 300B's offer you the most direct path to signal purity and they should be used in the simplest circuits possible. A tiny bit of Negative feedback might be appropriate to tighten up the bass response - but I would judge this very carefully in light of listening impressions.


Shoog
  Reply With Quote
Old 8th February 2008, 05:55 PM   #9
SY is offline SY  United States
diyAudio Moderator
 
SY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Chicagoland
Blog Entries: 1
If the tubes are linear, then shouldn't they have almost no "signature"?
__________________
You might be screaming "No, no, no" and all they hear is "Who wants cake?" Let me tell you something: They all do. They all want cake.- Wilford Brimley
  Reply With Quote
Old 8th February 2008, 10:33 PM   #10
diyAudio Member
 
Shoog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Eire
Quote:
If the tubes are linear, then shouldn't they have almost no "signature"?
True, but nothing is without some distinct flavor beyond its measured characturistics. The figures only tell you part of the story as far as I am concerned.

Would you not admit that an over zealous use of feedback kills the very quality which good triodes bring to the mix, ie air, space, warmth, ambience and microdetail.
Infact as Miles said himself,
"Too much tends to make for a "solid statey", "Big Box store" sound. I went with hollow state to get away from that. "

Shoog
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
FS: for 300B (JE Labs 300B SE) builders cartman Swap Meet 2 29th October 2008 01:13 PM
* 35 watt * 300B SE = super 300B + Class A2 rick57 Tubes / Valves 4 13th July 2005 04:18 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 12:21 AM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2