Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Tubes / Valves
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum

diyAudio Sponsor

Search for a tube at thetubestore.com                            Product reviews and more

Audio tubes for any amplifier: from high end home audio to classic guitar amps.

Quick links by tube type: 12AX7, EL34, 6L6, KT66, 6550, KT88, EL84, 12AU7, 12AT7, 6922, 6H30, 300B, 6V6, 6SN7 

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 3rd February 2008, 07:54 PM   #1
pftrvlr is offline pftrvlr  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: SoCal
Default Better Cap = Better Sound?

Have been playing some different cathode bypass cap with my headphone amp laterly.

The 6sn7-6bx7 wcf amp sounds smooth with a Panasonic TSHA for the wcf cathode bypass. When I added a WIMA 1.0uf in parallel, surprisingly it became harsh and edgy. Then I removed the WIMA, and it again sounds what I like better.

When I built my ef86-el84 amp, I used two pulled no-name 220uf elect cap to bypass the ef86 cathode because that was what I had at hand. It sounds so sweet, it is my current favorite. When the Muse cap I ordered from Canada arrived, I replaced the no-name cap with Muse || Wima. Again the result is very disappointing. So I now switch back the no-name cap and I am happy again.

I guess the better cap could make the amp response curve look better (my scope is not good enough to tell), but my ears like to be pleased by distortion, especially in the mid range.

Such is HIFI!
  Reply With Quote
Old 3rd February 2008, 09:27 PM   #2
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Canandaigua, NY USA
By definition, the "better" cap is the one that sounds better. There, problem solved.
  Reply With Quote
Old 3rd February 2008, 09:38 PM   #3
Gordy is offline Gordy  United Kingdom
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Did you measure any differences in the distortion spectrum?
  Reply With Quote
Old 3rd February 2008, 10:27 PM   #4
pftrvlr is offline pftrvlr  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: SoCal
I have one digital scope that can do FFT, but I have not done it, and I don't trust the result of this cheap scope. I prefer my ears as the final measure.
  Reply With Quote
Old 3rd February 2008, 10:50 PM   #5
rdf is offline rdf  Canada
diyAudio Member
 
rdf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: big smoke
Have you tried the Muse without a bypass?
__________________
Ears aren't microphones.
  Reply With Quote
Old 3rd February 2008, 11:06 PM   #6
diyAudio Moderator
 
Iain McNeill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Santa Cruz, California
apologies for not being familiar with terminology. Is this a cathode follower? Then the bypass would be the series cap passing signal on to next stage (headphones?)

Sounds like there's some frequency dependent impedance effects here. I'd want to know the output impedance of the cathode follower, the impedance curve of the headphones and the Effective Series Resistance (Impedance) of the cap's you're using before making any judgment here. A schematic perhaps?

If I'm way out in left field just ignore me 8-*
  Reply With Quote
Old 4th February 2008, 04:32 AM   #7
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Adelaide South Oz
Your experience is not unusual. When you improve one section of an amp it then has the capacity to show up all the "warts" in the other sections. Cathode bypass caps are a "classic". Improve those and all the faults/limitations in your power supply and front end are exposed.
Two choices:
Put the "lesser" quality cathode bypass caps back.
OR
Start more mods by improving final power supply caps, coupling caps etc.

Welcome to tghe joys of DIY.

Cheers,
Ian
  Reply With Quote
Old 4th February 2008, 01:41 PM   #8
kevinkr is offline kevinkr  United States
diyAudio Moderator
 
kevinkr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Boston, Massachusetts
Blog Entries: 6
And the best cap of all is no cap, it's relatively simple to re-arrange the white cathode follower for fixed bias on the lower tube of the pair eliminating the need for a cathode bypass cap. Led bias is another more transparent option if the an available led Vf lines up with the cathode bias voltage you need.

I designed a headphone amplifier using a D3A to drive a fixed bias 71A, and I had a lot of problems with cathode bypass capacitors in a previous design using this tube, so this time around I used a red led for bias - works quite well. Note though that this is actually a form of fixed bias because the bias voltage is largely independent of the current flowing through the tube. This technique is particularly useful with a CCS load because it does allow you to choose a specific operating point and know that you are on it.

FWIW: Large value electrolytics tend to have a lot of issues, (well known) and I have found the Nichicon Muse specifically in values larger than 220uF not to sound very good in cathode bypass use with very small dc voltages across them - the famed Black Gate (any grade) is better and in some cases you can actually observe a difference with an FFT or using burst wave forms and a scope where the Muse generated an awful lot of (visible) distortion. Why I don't know...
__________________
www.kta-hifi.net
  Reply With Quote
Old 4th February 2008, 02:35 PM   #9
Stixx is offline Stixx  Germany
diyAudio Member
 
Stixx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Southern Germany
After trying a few other mods in my C3G headphone amp the biggest improvement in sound came from using oscon as cathode bypass cap. I even reduced the value of the cap from 1000uf to 440uF/10V (since those oscons are pricey...) with no issues in bass extension.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg c3g.jpg (75.0 KB, 343 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 4th February 2008, 10:23 PM   #10
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Adelaide South Oz
Stixx,
I agree OSCONS really sound wonderful

BUT

be VERY carefull about the voltage rating and turn on surges etc.
OSCONS have zero overvoltage tolerance and they fail short circuit.

I found this out the hard way in a Morgan Jones Bevois Valley Amp.

The 2 x 68uF 20V OSCON cathode bypasses on the EL84 which attached to the top side of the concertina splitter would pop at HV switch on. Because it fails short circuit that meant no bias and a cooked tube.

I eventually went back to 50V Blackgate although simply deleting the Standby Switch in my amp would have probably stopped this happening. (when you turn on the HT you get a +ve pulse on the output tube grid attached to the top of the concertina, if the tubes are already warmed up you then get a big current pulse, therefore a big pulse at the cathode and that was taking out the OSCON bypass caps)

Cheers,
Ian
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
PC sound card sound chips kaluchka Chip Amps 6 20th June 2011 03:48 PM
SE sound vs Ultra Linear sound flysig Tubes / Valves 1 9th May 2009 10:21 PM
Eighteen Sound (18 Sound) NSD 1095N Compression Drivers and XT1086 Horns opc Swap Meet 6 1st May 2009 03:48 AM
Sound, Sound, and more Sound - Instractables Nordic Everything Else 0 5th March 2008 05:43 PM
Roland VS-1 Sound Module - No Sound! jazzbee Instruments and Amps 1 3rd March 2006 08:39 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 01:00 AM.

Page generated in 0.10837 seconds (80.24% PHP - 19.76% MySQL) with 11 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio