Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Tubes / Valves
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum

diyAudio Sponsor

Search for a tube at thetubestore.com                            Product reviews and more

Audio tubes for any amplifier: from high end home audio to classic guitar amps.

Quick links by tube type: 12AX7, EL34, 6L6, KT66, 6550, KT88, EL84, 12AU7, 12AT7, 6922, 6H30, 300B, 6V6, 6SN7 

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 23rd January 2008, 01:49 PM   #1
engels is offline engels  Israel
diyAudio Member
 
engels's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Question OT impedances calculations: where's my mistake??

I've got several OT's from all sorts of radios, vinyl players etc.
I want to see what their impedance ratios are - and seems like I have some mistake in my calculations that gives me wrong results every time. I know I'm an idiot but I still want to know.

Here's what I'm doing - where the mistake is?

1. I feed the primary of the SE OT with 40VAC from a variac.
2. I measure the secondary voltage.
3. I'm not sure already, but since impedance ratio = voltage ratio squared, I calculate it that way.

For example:
a SE OT from a reel to reel. The power tube was ECL82, speaker - 8 ohm, power transformer has 235VAC secondary (around 250V B+). ECL 82's datasheet says 8K load for 3.5W output.

So my measuremenst go like this: 40VAC on the primary, measured 0.6VAC on the secondary.

Z = (40/0.6)squared = 66.6666squared = 4444.44

With 8 ohm speaker it must be 4444 X 8 = 35.5K primary.

Makes sence? NO!!!

Another SE OT, from a radio which had 7C5 tube. must be 5K.

40VAC primary - 0.5VAC secondary.
Z=6400. With the 8ohm speaker it should have been 51.2K primary.

etc. etc.



  Reply With Quote
Old 23rd January 2008, 04:02 PM   #2
kevinkr is offline kevinkr  United States
diyAudio Moderator
 
kevinkr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Boston, Massachusetts
Blog Entries: 6
Something wrong with those voltage measurements, and or some of your assumptions. I'd make sure your meter is working correctly on that low voltage range..

A 10K to 8 ohm transformer has an impedance transformation ratio of 1250 and a turns ratio of 35.35 as an example.

You might be wrongly assuming an 8 ohm tap when in fact it is a 4 or even a 3.2 ohm tap - the results you get indicate that that might well be the case, but your secondary voltage meter readings are highly suspect. In the example cited above the voltage on the output winding would be 1.13Vrm..

Some old EL95 Telefunken transformers I have have 3.2 ohm secondaries...
__________________
www.kta-hifi.net
  Reply With Quote
Old 23rd January 2008, 04:08 PM   #3
jane is offline jane  Norway
diyAudio Member
 
jane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Norway
Are you sure that your measurements of the secondary windings are between common (0) and 8 ohm, and not the 8 ohm winding referring to a 4 (or 16) ohm tapping?
If so, that would explain the high ratio.

Jan E Veiset
__________________
Life is hard - Then you die.
  Reply With Quote
Old 23rd January 2008, 04:38 PM   #4
Yvesm is offline Yvesm  France
diyAudio Member
 
Yvesm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Ardeche
Yes !

2.5 Ohms speakers was not uncommon those days !

Yves.
  Reply With Quote
Old 23rd January 2008, 07:07 PM   #5
engels is offline engels  Israel
diyAudio Member
 
engels's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Default no

- there's only one secondary on those transformers
- the transformers were connected to speakers clearly labelled "8 ohm".
  Reply With Quote
Old 23rd January 2008, 07:21 PM   #6
SY is offline SY  United States
diyAudio Moderator
 
SY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Austin, TX
Blog Entries: 1
Then don't trust your measurement; your meter might be a lying ben zonah.

One thing comes to mind, is the 40V measured with the transformer connected?
__________________
“Listening to records is like ****ing a picture of Brigitte Bardot.” - Sergiu Celibidache
  Reply With Quote
Old 23rd January 2008, 08:09 PM   #7
diyAudio Member
 
jackinnj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Llanddewi Brefi, NJ
THis is where it's really useful to have an impedance bridge -- even the RCL Bridge that Heathkit used to sell will get you within a percent or so. IB5281 -- usually run less than $20.

And with a bridge you can measure leakage inductance, interwinding capacitance etc.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
More impedances for Hammond 125E revintage Tubes / Valves 1 25th August 2009 02:40 PM
Matching Impedances dscrobe Tubes / Valves 3 26th September 2007 06:49 AM
Dual Speaker Impedances tom daghdha Subwoofers 22 24th July 2006 11:24 PM
line input impedances? Dominique Parts 5 5th August 2004 11:19 AM
Speaker impedances Vivek Everything Else 11 30th July 2001 08:07 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 04:14 PM.

Page generated in 0.09248 seconds (87.49% PHP - 12.51% MySQL) with 10 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio