|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum |
| diyAudio Sponsor | ||
|
|
||
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Indiana
|
I was thinking about safety issues and given the limited BW of guitar amps I was surprised that I have not seen any consideration of transformer input. Has anyone tried/considered this? Other than cost is there any reason why it would be undesirable?
This would be the safest input method would it not? mike |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Central Berlin, Germany
|
Hi Mike,
The problem is the high impedance of guitars, they like to see inputs with 100k ohms or so. And transformers work best when at least one side is low impedance, which would not be the case with a regular tube amp input. There are not many xformers around which qualify for this task, maybe the Jensen JT-112P-2HPC would work but it is a little bit too specialized for something else, and has quite a bit of capacitance, not good. One can use an active buffer circuit before the xformer, then the primary works on a low impedance. I did this, with a low noise JFET-Follower (search for "Curl follower" for the topology), running off an extra isolated (floating) supply, and driving a Lundahl LL1531. There was no degradation in sound and only little additional noise. The reason was not safety issues but galvanic isolation of the input (no earth GND connection), to avoid ground loop hum. It also helped against RF problems (no more radio station in the background). A problem is danger of ESD damage, which tends to kill semiconductors (or degrades them, each time a little more), while tubes don't bother at all. ESD protection is absolutely necessary. - Klaus |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Indiana
|
I see the problem. Would a cap (or cap with small resistance in series) from the input jack ground to the signal ground accomplish much the same thing safety wise (and take out the microphone bite threat) just as well?
mike |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: North Derbyshire
|
There's no need for transformer coupling, the amplifier chassis, and thus the guitar lead, should be earthed anyway.
If you really are concerned?, use a radio pack on your guitar - no connection at all then! - but correct use and maintainence should keep a normal guitar amp perfectly safe. As suggested, the required input impedance for a passive guitar is too high for a transformer, with the suggested 100K being really on the low side. Most guitar inputs are between 1M and 10M - but for an active guitar this isn't needed, as an active guitar has a much lower output impedance from the amplifier inside.
__________________
Nigel Goodwin |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Bridgeville, CA
|
If you really want a transformer guitar input, Jensen makes the JT-DB-E direct input transformer. It is a 12:1 ratio step down that is made for guitar pickups. Guitar pickups run in the range of 5K impedance, which is not particularly high. I have measured 10V P-P from my Les Paul whilst doing Townshend style roundhouse power chords ;-)
The Direct Input transformers are meant to be used to input a guitar into a balanced microphone preamp or recording console input with a nominal 600-1600 ohm input impedance, hence the name "Direct Input" or D.I. but will work fine for a built in input circuit. You will need to make up for the voltage ratio of 12:1 (-21db) with more gain in the front stage which may lead to more noise. It might be the first guitar amp with a parallel 6922 input stage... Michael |
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: North Derbyshire
|
Quote:
Check any guitar amp, you need MUCH more than 5K for a passive guitar - considering the pots are usually 250K the output impedance is obviously in the 100's of kilo-ohms. Aim for 1M minimum, and preferably more - if you really want to be 'flash' (and you can buy expensive preamps that do this), then have a nice high impedance and place a pot (wired as a variable resistor) across the input, this will allow you to adjust the input impedance.
__________________
Nigel Goodwin |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | ||
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Indiana
|
Nigel,
If I am understanding you correctly the ground of the input jack should go directly to the chassis safety ground not just to the signal ground. Is that correct? Sometimes signal and safety ground (earth) are separated by an RC string. mike |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 1 Input/2outputs Guitar Amp Switch | hughes123 | Instruments and Amps | 1 | 6th July 2009 03:45 PM |
| Input transformer: floating input = distortion | ErikdeBest | Tubes / Valves | 13 | 20th January 2009 09:36 AM |
| Guitar amp input tube paralleled | voivodata | Tubes / Valves | 3 | 8th July 2006 06:11 PM |
| Mic input for guitar? | Original Burnedfingers | Tubes / Valves | 1 | 21st May 2004 11:33 AM |
| guitar amp input jack help | BelieveInKarma | Tubes / Valves | 16 | 30th December 2003 04:44 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.10784 seconds (77.71% PHP - 22.29% MySQL) with 10 queries |