Datasheets: RC coupled amp VS. typical characteristics - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Tubes / Valves
Home Forums Rules Articles diyAudio Store Gallery Wiki Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 18th November 2007, 08:19 PM   #1
engels is offline engels  Israel
diyAudio Member
engels's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Jerusalem, Israel
Default Datasheets: RC coupled amp VS. typical characteristics

A couple of times I've seen datasheets where cathode resistor in "typical operations" was significantly smaller than in "RC coupled amp table". I understand you can bias it any way you like but still cannot understand what's the story.


5670 - double triode.
see page 3: cass A1 amplifier, cathode resistor = 240 ohm.
in class A RC coupled amplifier table below the lowest cathode resistor is 900 ohm.

5719 - submin triode
page 1: characteristicsn- plate 100V, cathode resistor = 1.5K.
page 6: RC coupled amp - plate 100V, cathode res. = 2.7K and higher.

5718 - submin triode
characteristics: cathode 150 ohm - plate 100V
RC amp - cathode 1K and higher (under 100V)

I'm sure I am missing some point. Why is that difference?
  Reply With Quote
Old 18th November 2007, 09:46 PM   #2
diyAudio Member
Miles Prower's Avatar
Join Date: May 2005
Location: USA
Blog Entries: 7
Default Re: Datasheets: RC coupled amp VS. typical characteristics

Originally posted by engels
I'm sure I am missing some point. Why is that difference?
What you see under the heading of "Characteristics and Typical Operation" are nominal values used to determine the parameters listed: plate resistance, transconductance, amplification factor, &c. These are nominal figures used as "figure of merit" as an aid to selecting a type for an application. It gives you a rough idea as to what the particular VT is capable of. Of course, in an actual circuit, the likely Q-point will be vastly different. VTs aren't like transistors with consistant device parameters. Plate resistance, transconductance, amplification factor can wander all over the place. I also determine these from the characteristic.

Lots of VT specs also suggest typical circuits. I ignore these completely, and design based on loadlines. Most of those sample circuits are based on 5.0% THD, which is pretty awful. Nor is it always possible to use the specified Vpp. I can do better by picking my own Q-points and distortion figures from the plate characteristics. Consider it to be nothing more than a cheat for lazy designers.
There are no foxes in atheistholes
  Reply With Quote


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
capacitor coupled vs. direct coupled ouput hugobross Solid State 11 21st January 2011 01:56 AM
6sn7 direct coupled and transformer coupled neazoi Tubes / Valves 3 23rd May 2008 03:30 PM
Typical 2A3 hum? bobhayes Tubes / Valves 31 17th October 2005 01:12 PM
Just your typical DIY enclosure.. ScottG Multi-Way 2 10th July 2005 10:44 PM
Can someone explain parafeed & direct coupled & a.c. coupled? mwmitchell Tubes / Valves 2 11th September 2002 01:10 PM

New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 08:22 AM.

vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2017 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2017 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2