|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Trondheim
|
Hello all!
I recently scored a neat supply of some nice STC 3A / 110B DHT triodes! http://frank.pocnet.net/short/054/0/094.pdf This triode have a nice rp of ~5,5k and a mu of 12 and a 4V / 0,25A heater! A perfect candidate for a Transformer coupled, battery heated preamp So looking about in the Lundahl catalog I noticed the LL1680. http://www.lundahl.se/pdfs/datash/1680.pdf A prim.ind. of 210 at 5mA and a 15K/600 (or 150) ohm impedance ratio. Seems perfect for this triode! So I am strongly considering ordering a pair gapped for 8mA. But I thought I'd check with you guys first. What will the inductance be for a 8mA gapped type? My calculations says I need at least 150H (~10Hz). If a 8mA type gives to low inductance I will considder making a ParaFeed preamp with a Gary Pimm BBMCCCS. Should I order a "un-gapped" LL1680 then? Any other suggestions also apprechiated Stigla |
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
diyAudio Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Belgium
|
Hi,
Quote:
Cheers,
__________________
Frank |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Trondheim
|
Hmmm, yeah, think I'll do that! thanx!
stigla |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Account Disabled
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: hong kong
|
hi,
if U use the un air-grab pre-amp output must use cap couple. If not like to use the cap couple. choose a preamp output trans that can pass current. 10~15ma is safe. too low will easy to cause saturation of core will weak the bass. thansk Thomas |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Near London. UK
|
If it isn't, you could make a constant current anode load out of a semiconductor cascode using BC558B at the top, and MJE340 at the botton. Then, use the transformer in a parafeed circuit of your choice, and don't worry about gaps. The cascode would also greatly improve the stage's rejection of power supply hum.
Of course, I may have broken a taboo by suggesting semiconductors and directly heated triodes in the same breath. On the other hand, it would certainly be different.
__________________
The loudspeaker: The only commercial Hi-Fi item where a disproportionate part of the budget isn't spent on the box. And the one where it would make a difference... |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Account Disabled
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: hong kong
|
To EC8010,
do u know the air gap is physically better than the parafeel design. I agree that parafeel can slove this proble, But still use air gap is better. thanks Thomas |
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Sofia
|
I've always tried to grasp the sonic philosophy of parafeed. Other than allowing the use of puny transformers and still have bass i can't see any advantages. You have to accept the slight rounding of transients every transformer imposes plus the added flavour of a coupling cap. The whole idea of transformer coupling for me is to remove an electronic hash even the best caps impose, so why reintroduce it?
Ditto for the silicon. Maybe a FET CCS can coexist with valves but two bipolars? cheers peter |
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Trondheim
|
Hi guys!
Nice to have an old tread back again! Here's what I did: I ordered the 8mA gapped types. I have them, and the tubes, and everything! I will use the Easter holiday to put them together. As implied by fdegrove I thought it would be the wisest thing to do. I will try this normal setting first. Why use a Cap AND a transformer right? Lundahl stated that 8mA gap will leave me with a Prim. Ind. of ~130H, so I'm a little worried that bass will be a bit weak, but we'll see (one formula I found at Steve Banch's site gave me a -3dB point at ~7 Hz and that would'v been nice if this is right)If this is not the case, I'll try a Gary Pimm BBMCCS and not use the low impedance output in a Parafeed configuration. Another thing that cought my attention lately is the fact that the Miller capacitance of the 3B/110B is 133pF!! Thats quite high, and now I'm worried about the HF rolloff as well, since I plan to use a 50k pot. (my CD player needs at least 50k...) Thanks for your interest guys, I really appreciate it! stigla |
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Norge
|
Quote:
???
__________________
- Jan - |
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Tube Preamp Popping on Source Input Change (?) / 6DJ8 Preamp On Chip Amps | MartyM | Tubes / Valves | 3 | 16th October 2008 04:52 AM |
| twisted pear Preamp/other suggestions for Preamp kit | LukeDuke | Chip Amps | 1 | 1st February 2008 09:57 PM |
| Electret mic preamp - will phono preamp work? | darthmullet | Analogue Source | 6 | 12th October 2007 07:32 AM |
| Lundahl LL1680 for balanced output | wuffer | Tubes / Valves | 0 | 5th June 2006 08:01 AM |
| wiring preamp outs on a preamp | bonsai171 | Solid State | 4 | 22nd March 2004 10:13 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |