Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Tubes / Valves
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum

diyAudio Sponsor

Search for a tube at thetubestore.com                            Product reviews and more

Audio tubes for any amplifier: from high end home audio to classic guitar amps.

Quick links by tube type: 12AX7, EL34, 6L6, KT66, 6550, KT88, EL84, 12AU7, 12AT7, 6922, 6H30, 300B, 6V6, 6SN7 

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 9th September 2007, 07:34 AM   #1
diyAudio Member
 
Drewaudio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: New Zealand
Unhappy DIY speaker choice for SE

Guys, I'm probably opening a huge can of trouble but I'd really like some guidance on which DIY speaker projects I should consider for an SE tube amp (triode KT88 or EL34). I'd prefer to focus on a floor standing two way design.

Is something like the (now 10 year old) Ariel worth the effort?

Thank you,
Andrew

PS At the moment I'm listening to Quad's ESL63 through a Quad 707 amp.
  Reply With Quote
Old 9th September 2007, 07:52 AM   #2
diyAudio Member
 
Geek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
That depends a lot on your budget.

If you don't have a lot to spend, you might consider the more efficient Tang Band midwoofs and tweeters. If you have a reasonable amount, you might want to think Lowther or Fostex fullrange horn loaded.

Cheers!
  Reply With Quote
Old 9th September 2007, 10:19 AM   #3
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Andrew,

Why don't you post this question on the full range forum. There are alot of very knowledgeable guys out there that can help you with a speaker DIY project that is high effiency. I can tell you that I like to listen to my music very loud and like it to be crystal clear with alot of range. My system used to be a three-way with the Adcom GFA5802 SS amp (450w RMS per channel @ 4ohms) driving the mids and highs and an Anthony Gallo Reference Sub amp driving my subs rated at 250w RMS per channel. Sounded good and got very loud. I have converted to a tube amp with high efficiency speakers and will never turn back. My point is that I now have a tube based amp that with only a couple watts driving a pair of back loaded horns with the Fostex FE208 Sigmas get just as loud and sound simply astonishing. There is a relatively simple build of a horn called a 'BIB' (Bigger is better.) that comes to mind for your project since it is a relatively simple horn build. Horns are the most difficult speakers to build so that is why I mention this.

Good luck with your project.
  Reply With Quote
Old 9th September 2007, 03:27 PM   #4
frugal-phile(tm)
diyAudio Moderator
 
planet10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Victoria, BC, NA, Sol III
Blog Entries: 4
SE amps tend to sound best with a speaker with a smooth, flatish impedance curve ie tend not to like crossovers. They also like efficiency because they are (usually) fairly low output. So if a 2-way it should be more like a fullrange with a helper tweeter (xoed with a single cap) or an active woofer with a mid-tweeter (usually also classified as a full-range)

dave

The frugal-horn site is loaded with speakers aimed at SE amps.
__________________
community sites t-linespeakers.org, frugal-horn.com ........ commercial site planet10-HiFi
p10-hifi forum here at diyA
  Reply With Quote
Old 9th September 2007, 03:48 PM   #5
Svein_B is offline Svein_B  Norway
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Quote:
Originally posted by planet10
SE amps tend to sound best with a speaker with a smooth, flatish impedance curve . . . . . .
So how do we achieve that goal, together with reasonable high efficiency?
Aperiodic loading should give a flat[ish] impedance curve, esp. if combined with a zobel to smoth the higher regions.
Since it will not have a port that bosts the lows, we should probably use at least an 8" driver to get some grunt.

Is it time we "re-invented" the Dynaco A25 ?


Svein
  Reply With Quote
Old 9th September 2007, 07:14 PM   #6
frugal-phile(tm)
diyAudio Moderator
 
planet10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Victoria, BC, NA, Sol III
Blog Entries: 4
Quote:
Originally posted by Svein_B
So how do we achieve that goal, together with reasonable high efficiency?
If you look at the typical full-range it has a shallow U shaped impedance curve. Ignoring for now any impedance changes in the bass due to bass loading, the high output impedance of a no (low) feedback SE amp, then we have the amp providing more power when the impedance curve rises -- right where the typical FR starts to fall off.

So what we are suggesting is that we won't consider the speaker in isolation from the amplifier.

Here is a start on the subject.

Now to bass loading... aperiodic is a typically better loading than sealed, with a flatter low end bump (ie less power boost in the LF than sealed). If you look at the available FR units it is a challenge to find one that gets you the bass extension you want at the bottom. Because of the impedance bump at the XO in the A25 you get a lower treble boost. And getting any midrange finesse out of a 10" driver is quite the challenge (BTW, the A25 has arisen again in the form of the World Design WD25 -- as i understand from the hand of the A25 designer).

Well then how about bass reflex. The double peak here can be an issue, and since T/S parameters change as we give the boots to the volume control tuning changes depending on volume -- the high output impedance of the SE amp exacerbates a BR tendency to have lumpy bass at some volume. We can try to get some of the advantages of BR while ameriolating its disadvantages by taking a couple approaches (there are probably more). One of these is to push these towards aperiodic by adding some "resistance" to the port. This can be done with long high aspect ratoio ports (exemplified by the Fonken) or by stuffing the port (exemplified by the sock in the port comments). The other approach is to have the port exert iron-fisted control over the alignment. This is exemplified by the BVR (Big Vent Reflex). The monstrous vents contain enuff air mass to dominate the driver. This can be see in the large range of drivers usable in Harvey.

When we get to the really high efficiency drivers they tend to have really low Q -- and it now requires a horn to get any real bass out of them. We end up with ripples in the FR and in the impedance curve. They come in a FR where we are actually accumtomed to frequency anomalies due to the room, and a clever designer can minimize problems to the point where advantages outweigh disadvantages. Some people can ignore this ripple more than others, That BIBs are so popular and that many people (most that actually try them) can live with their ripple is a testament.

dave
__________________
community sites t-linespeakers.org, frugal-horn.com ........ commercial site planet10-HiFi
p10-hifi forum here at diyA
  Reply With Quote
Old 9th September 2007, 11:11 PM   #7
Jaime is offline Jaime  Uruguay
diyAudio Member
 
Jaime's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Montevideo
Dewaudio
SET EL34 or KT88 have low power. You need high efficient boxes.
The easy way is go to a full range Fostex FE168EZ in recommended horn enclosures.
Ariel loudspeakers are more expensive, but I believe are a good option too.
Best regards Jaime
__________________
I write in English worse than Tarzan
  Reply With Quote
Old 10th September 2007, 02:57 AM   #8
diyAudio Member
 
bloozestringer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Well, I have a set of Pi Tower Two's that I built that put out some pretty good sound with a <1 W 12B4 amp. I've heard them on a EL34 SE amp (10W) as well and they were plenty loud. All of Waynes designs are high efficiency. His horns sound exceptionally good with low wattage (<10W) amps.

http://www.pispeakers.com/contents.html
  Reply With Quote
Old 10th September 2007, 07:27 AM   #9
diyAudio Member
 
Drewaudio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: New Zealand
Thank you guys, you've given me a lot to think about! I'll have to search for the bib design and other full range designs in the full range forum.

Cheers!
Andrew
  Reply With Quote
Old 16th September 2007, 07:25 AM   #10
diyAudio Member
 
Drewaudio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: New Zealand
Well, I've read a heap of posts about dyi full range speakers and I think the FE167e is the driver for me. It's really difficult to choose a driver and cabinet to build based on what people post and without hearing any of the finished projects!

I've selected the FT-1600II as the cabinet which gives the best balance between WAF and performance.

Thank you for your recommendation to go down the full range path. I'll let you know how I get on...

Kind Regards
Andrew
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Opinion on speaker choice revans Full Range 18 26th September 2008 10:20 AM
Speaker choice ? SebR Multi-Way 10 12th April 2007 07:42 AM
What’s a good choice of speaker Hayden Multi-Way 20 15th October 2005 04:55 PM
DIY speaker choice stevesmith7 Multi-Way 6 31st December 2002 03:07 PM
DIY speaker choice.... Nick Stock Multi-Way 8 13th September 2002 03:23 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 09:32 AM.

Page generated in 0.12297 seconds (78.51% PHP - 21.49% MySQL) with 11 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio