|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum |
| diyAudio Sponsor | ||
|
|
||
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2007
|
Hi, all!
Currently I have a basic SRPP configuration with decoupling capacitor. Sound quality depends on this cap. I use 0,33uF (for Rload = 47k, load of preamplifier). I plan to upgrate to better cap (MCap Silver/Oil) 0,470uF.<br/> What about using 5uF + 0,1uF in parallel? Or even better, using an output transformer!? How much does that usually improves the sound? Of course, using a good quality OPT. I did not manage to found any schematic of SRPP (preamp!) design of using OPT instead of decoupling capacitor Does anyone know how to do it?Thanks, Matej |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Chicago
|
With an output transformer, you are still probably going to need a cap. Otherwise, the transformer primary will just be a short to ground. Its use is less as a better sounding cap, and more as a way to lower ouput impedance, or to eliminate ground loop issues.
__________________
http://www.ecpaudio.com |
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2007
|
Quote:
Commonly used is 0.470uF... but some (hi-end) use 5uF (or even more) + 0.1uF as bypass? Can larger value hurt? (except $$$$) Why to bypass? - Matej |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | ||
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Chicago
|
Quote:
Also, some power amps, especially solid state power amps, have a much lower input impedance than 100K. 10K is not uncommon. Some people think that larger caps can degrade sound more than smaller ones. Quote:
__________________
http://www.ecpaudio.com |
||
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
|
As I understand it, it is either OPT or SRPP.
If SRPP is retained, it will be a form of a parafeed, and, unless you wish to step up/down transformer, only benefit will be low DC resistance. And you will need high primary inductance (good OPT, as you said). Or use a choke instead? |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 12ax7 srpp dac output | Klimon | Tubes / Valves | 26 | 30th April 2010 12:59 AM |
| SRPP with FETS, what output stage? | davidallancole | Solid State | 18 | 4th January 2008 05:39 PM |
| How to figure output Z of SRPP? | smbrown | Tubes / Valves | 13 | 12th January 2007 03:15 PM |
| 6as7 SRPP output stage | Molloy | Tubes / Valves | 4 | 15th September 2006 05:39 PM |
| Audio Note DAC4 SRPP output stage problems! | bbakota2000 | Tubes / Valves | 5 | 12th June 2005 12:25 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.08556 seconds (78.35% PHP - 21.65% MySQL) with 10 queries |