|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum |
|
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2006
|
Hi
I'd like to do a vacum valve ampli about 15 to 20w. I like single end for good sound and cathode follower for performance on DHT and Zin out. I think it 'll be easyer to do using valves like 6c33 or el 519 I knowsthat it 's possible to use boostraping to help driver to do his hard job : 200 to 250 vott cc What do you think about this projet. Thanks Yan |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
^^^^^
Need more details. Were you thinking of going OTL, or is an OPT OK? Cathode follower outputs are doable, but it is nowhere as easy as using a common cathode final. 15 -- 20W of output is 845 territory, and that will really complicate matters to say the least. |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: South Florida
|
Bruce Rozenblitt has a SE cathode follower design in his "Audio Reality" book. This design uses 3 X KT88 in parallel to generate about 20 watts. I have not built one, so I have no experience with the design.
I have been experimenting with cathode follower output stages. I fine that you need a tube that has a relatively high GM and can handle high peak currents. I do not have any EL519 or 6C33 to test, so I can't comment on those, but I have tested a bunch of different tubes, and come to similar conclusions. I have not made the triode - pentode decision yet, but I have decided that the triode would be a 6336A, or a pair of 5998's. Both are similar to the 6C33. My pentode choice would be a 6LW6, not to far from the EL519. For the driver circuit, I am using a two stage 6V6 SE amp. I replaced the output transformer with a choke, and used capacitor coupling into the output tube grid (a parafeed connection). My choke is too small (kills the bass), so I plan to switch to a CCS load when I have more time to experiment. The optimum load impedance looks like it is in the 500 ohm to 1K ohm range, but it depends a lot on factors that I haven't nailed down yet, like the choice of tube, B+ voltage, and tube current.
__________________
Too much power is almost enough! Turn it up till it explodes - then back up just a little. |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2006
|
hi
Without schema : it's difficulte to discribe . 1 er stage : a usual commun cathode or SRPP with 12at7 or 6dj8 and + - 300v 2 eme stage a over commun cathode in direct link with 12b4 and + - 800 volt 3 eme in C F 2 EL519 tiode connected and OPT about - + 400 Ohm There is a over way to drive the output stage with boostrap : a self induction is in beetwin +U and plate's charge resistor of driver. In this way you can choice all power valves and using high charge impedance and use KT 88 KT90 I'd like to know if this way gives good sound Thanks Yan24 |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Paris
|
Hi! There was an interesting description of such an amp in the defunct Audiophile review .. from Guy Marec if i'm right . He said it was astonishing . The main difficult remains in the driver ...
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: SoCal
|
My first tube build was a 6c33c cathode follower. I tried bootstrapping, but had a problem with turn on thump from when the drivers stage cap charged. Though I'm sure it would work if done under different conditions. Bootstrapping is a form of positive feedback, which will raise the output impedance and add distortion, which is what you are trying to get away from when doing the cathode follower approch. However, if the driver stage is using an active load(CCS) it seems, you may not encounter the negative effects of bootstrapping. Since the CCS would in a sense isolate the outputs audio from the driver tube. Eventhough I now perfer passive loads to active and would suggest just going with a larger voltage transformer for the driver stage.
The hardest part about building a 6c33c SET(at least in the US) is sourcing transformers. Both output and power trannies. The outcome was rewarding though, the amp sounds very clean and detailed. Eventhough there are a couple things I'd do different if I were to do it again. It benches at .1xx% THD up till it starts soft clipping. Oh, forgot to mention the tight bass and that it can handle 3way speakers. If you decide to go that route I can help you out. |
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: England
|
Quote:
Bonne chance 7N7
__________________
Plug them in and light them up |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Eire
|
Heres just a stab in the dark, but here goes.
When looking at tubes like the 6080,6C33 and such like I would guess that a common cathode with a normal output transformer will produce almost all of the benefits of the cathode follower, but with extra power and easier design. I say this from some personal experience with low output impedance valves and the resultant low ratio transformers. The basis for my assertion been that the low output impedance gives maximum bite on the transformer inductance, and the low ratio minimises stray nasties which tend to bleed off the high frequency response. My conclusion, for what its worth, is why bother with a cathode follower (with its degenerative feedback) when a common cathode will probably sound as good. You may disagree. Shoog |
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Paris
|
And just add some total local feedback as CF does and ...
You french guys (and others ..) have a look at my OTLs on Radiofil forum / realisations personnelles / un demi mètre carré d'OTLs
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: big smoke
|
Quote:
__________________
Ears aren't microphones. |
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| cathode follower | vlljpior | Tubes / Valves | 6 | 22nd March 2005 07:50 PM |
| Question about direct coupling a anode follower into a cathode follower. | G | Tubes / Valves | 45 | 29th July 2004 06:47 PM |
| cathode follower | ackcheng | Tubes / Valves | 2 | 6th July 2004 03:12 PM |
| Cathode Follower? Yay or nay? | SHiFTY | Tubes / Valves | 25 | 16th March 2004 06:38 AM |
| cathode follower | olvrkrg | Tubes / Valves | 3 | 21st February 2004 09:49 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |