|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum |
| diyAudio Sponsor | ||
|
|
||
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
|
hello all.
I'm looking at a direct coupled input stage which runs something like a CCS loaded ECC88 into an equally CCS loaded 12BH7 cathode follower. Picture the front end of a Willamson amplifier but the concertina is only driving from the CF output so far no drama. my query is then, how does the amp deal with drift of operating points over the life of the tubes? My concern is that even a small change in the steady state anode voltage messes up the operating point of the second tube. Can anyone shed some light on this? is the drift actually very small? or is some other process going on? Apologies if this is actually self evident - clearly direct coupled amps work (well) but I'd rather like to understand why... cheers Andy |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Near London. UK
|
The anode voltage of the first stage may well drift, but it doesn't matter because the cathode follower isn't really very bothered about its Vak and it has lots of feedback wrapped around it. Imagine that second stage (before feedback) as having a flat loadline due to the CCS, then all that's happening is that drift from the first stage erodes a little headroom at one end of the other of the cathode follower. Now, if the second stage had gain, drift of that first stage would be far more important...
__________________
The loudspeaker: The only commercial Hi-Fi item where a disproportionate part of the budget isn't spent on the box. And the one where it would make a difference... |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: near Duesseldorf
|
Hi Andrew,
an effective method for reducing the gm for dc of the input tube is a higher cathode resistor. The anode load reduces the gm by the factor 1+ Ra/rp, the cathode load 1+ gm*Rk. Adjust the bias by a positive voltage on the grid. Regards Andreas |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Use a CCS with a servo like I do in such cases.
__________________
The devil is not so terrible as his mathematical model! Wavebourn: We Create Creativity! |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
|
EC8010,
thanks for that, I think I see the feedback in the cathode follower is reducing the error (as it would) the cathode is tending to follow the grid anyway so its almost self compensating. Is that about the size of it? generally though, If the second stage has gain then, what are the likely problems? I've seen this done with a couple of *sn7 sections, and I guess it works? I still feel like I'm missing something, If the anode voltage of the first stage changes the second stage operating point is supposed to move... Is the basic rule to assume that the operating point of the second triode is going to be 'in the general area' of -n volts? i.e. realistically you won't get full swing from the second triode? And if so. what sort of variation is common during the life of the tube (now thats the million dollar question isn't it?!) Does any one know of any resources that cover tube aging? although to be honest I'm not sure how I'd relate this to the above... cheers Andy |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
|
waveborne, I'm fully intending to use a CCS's I already tested this out on a previous amp.
If it isn't such a daft question then how are you feeding the servo into the CCS - I assume this is what you are up to? My scratchings this afternoon involved level shifting from the anode of the first tube and setting the grid bias to maintain a "constant" VA - no, it didnt look so pretty then either. Cheers Andy |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
__________________
The devil is not so terrible as his mathematical model! Wavebourn: We Create Creativity! |
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
|
Quote:
Basically, the first stage DC drift will translate to a second stage bias drift only where a volt or three makes little difference to the first stage, it makes a lot of difference at the grid of the second stage. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Jakarta
|
In the case of a mu stage, it can easily be coupled directly to a following stage, with no risk of drift, if the CCS of the mu stage consists of a MOSFET and the output is taken from the MOSFET's source. This is based on the fact that biasing the MOSFET's gate to a fixed voltage will also force its source to be at that voltage.
The bias-point can be fixed using a (capacitor-bypassed) potential divider between B+ and ground or, if you don't trust the stability of your PS, you can use a (capacitor-bypassed) zener. Connect the bias-point to the MOSFET's gate using a high value (several megohms) resistor. |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Near London. UK
|
Andrew; yes, you've pretty much "got it." Of course, the second stage can't distinguish between a wanted anode movement and an unwanted, so your "general area" supposition is correct. Now, if you go to a differential pair following another, a common drift in anode currents is rejected (although differences are amplified). As to how to minimise drift, regulated heaters and HTs would be a good starting point; have a look at oscilloscope circuits. Nevertheless, I'm fairly sure there's an old valve book with a chapter entitled, "DC amplifiers, and why to avoid them." Pretty well sums it up, really.
__________________
The loudspeaker: The only commercial Hi-Fi item where a disproportionate part of the budget isn't spent on the box. And the one where it would make a difference... |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| capacitor coupled vs. direct coupled ouput | hugobross | Solid State | 11 | 21st January 2011 01:56 AM |
| 6sn7 direct coupled and transformer coupled | neazoi | Tubes / Valves | 3 | 23rd May 2008 03:30 PM |
| My first amp - a direct coupled 2A3 | Wardsweb | Tubes / Valves | 51 | 3rd August 2003 04:22 AM |
| Can someone explain parafeed & direct coupled & a.c. coupled? | mwmitchell | Tubes / Valves | 2 | 11th September 2002 01:10 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.10432 seconds (82.62% PHP - 17.38% MySQL) with 10 queries |