6SL7 in place of a 12AX7? - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Tubes / Valves

Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 20th June 2007, 01:39 AM   #1
jarthel is offline jarthel  Australia
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: somewhere in Australia
Default 6SL7 in place of a 12AX7?

Eli Duttman has said that the 6SL7 is very close to 12AX7 except for the mu.

Also, people has used a 5751 in placed of a 1AX7 and this website (http://www.audiophool.cjb.net/Equiv_similar.htm) says 5751 is an equivalent to 6SL7.

any thoughts?

Thank you.
  Reply With Quote
Old 20th June 2007, 06:40 AM   #2
diyAudio Moderator Emeritus
 
ray_moth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Jakarta
My own opinion: 12AX7 is insufficiently linear. I would never use it. 6SL7 is a much better choice and the fact that its mu is only 70 compared to the 12AX7's mu of 100 should not matter in most applications.
  Reply With Quote
Old 20th June 2007, 07:19 AM   #3
cerrem is offline cerrem  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: San Diego, CA
12AX7 is not electricaly close to a 6SL7 spec wise...but can be substituted provided you watch your operating point and re-adjust the cathode bias only if need be..
Even though the mu is about 70 , the plate resistance is lower, thus making up for the lower mu when trying to achive similair gain...
For example lets say you have a 12AX7 100K plate resistor and 1K at the cathode bypassed... 300V B+.....
Plate resistance 65K...
Gain will be roughly 60 .....

Now replace with 6SL7....
Gain is about 49....
Replace load resistor with 150K and Gain = 54 ....
Adjust cathode bias accordingly if needed....
So in some cases it is close substitute.....
6SL7 sounds better anyway

Chris
  Reply With Quote
Old 20th June 2007, 08:06 AM   #4
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Zürich
Quote:
Originally posted by ray_moth
My own opinion: 12AX7 is insufficiently linear. I would never use it. 6SL7 is a much better choice and the fact that its mu is only 70 compared to the 12AX7's mu of 100 should not matter in most applications.
SY posted about a recent distortion measurement he did on ECC83's, and concluded that loaded with a CCS they were very linear.

Erik
  Reply With Quote
Old 20th June 2007, 11:30 AM   #5
Klimon is offline Klimon  Belgium
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Leuven
Besides being thrashed by almost everyone except the generic amp producing companies I kinda like the 12ax7 (or atleast did as driver for el84 se and as two stage MM amp). 5751 and 6072 are variaties with higher esteem (and much higher price-card). I have no experience with 6sl7 though (I'll be using it in a amp that's being built).

Simon
  Reply With Quote
Old 20th June 2007, 11:35 PM   #6
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Pretoria, South Africa
I also concur with 6SL7 choice - have used both 6SL7 and 12AX7.

But one needs to keep in mind that in low level use the 12AX7 is superior regarding hum (from heater) and noise, simply because of later design, also especially for audio use. Being smaller, it is less microphonic, more sturdy. I do not use 12AX7 in power amplifier designs, especially as (popular) input stages because of Miller-C effect on NFB stability. [Not asked, but in power amplifier use I really prefer the 12AT7 (ECC81) - but this expands the subject somewhat to include still other tubes.]
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
6SL7 5E3 - together at last? atmars Tubes / Valves 12 24th November 2008 01:59 AM
2x 2Sk170 in place of 2SK389 and 2x 2SJ74 in place of 2SJ109? jarthel Parts 12 26th July 2007 09:08 AM
Using a 6SL7 in a tube overdrive pedal instead of 12AX7? G Tubes / Valves 5 21st March 2005 11:34 AM
Best place to place bleeder resistor in a power supply? G Tubes / Valves 13 4th August 2004 09:26 AM
6SL7 or 12AX7 in Kimmel OTL Alastair E Tubes / Valves 6 10th March 2004 04:12 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 02:51 PM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright ©1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2