Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Tubes / Valves
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum

diyAudio Sponsor

Search for a tube at thetubestore.com                            Product reviews and more

Audio tubes for any amplifier: from high end home audio to classic guitar amps.

Quick links by tube type: 12AX7, EL34, 6L6, KT66, 6550, KT88, EL84, 12AU7, 12AT7, 6922, 6H30, 300B, 6V6, 6SN7 

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 18th June 2007, 03:23 PM   #1
diyAudio Member
 
beau2317's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Pukekohe, New Zealand
Default Anyone tweaked a California Audio Labs Alpha DAC?

I just picked up a good deal on a used California Audio Labs Alpha DAC. It has a tube output stage.

I have not looked in detail yet, but read somewhere on the net that it has a pair of 12AX7s, one per channel. Both triodes are wired in parallel, as a cathode follower, with a solid state current source.

B+ is said to be 140V

I was wondering if anyone has tried tweaking this? Or have any suggestions.

I've not been impressed normally with the 12AX7, but the DAC makes a pretty good sound out of the box.

What other tubes could I try?
__________________
Moskido (Hybrid Aikido/Mosfet). Verumecce (biased interconnects). Buffalo III with tube output
  Reply With Quote
Old 19th June 2007, 04:40 AM   #2
Jeb-D. is offline Jeb-D.  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Jeb-D.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: SoCal
That seems pretty weird to use 12ax7's as output tubes even if it is small signal stages.

Anyhow there is a lot of 12ax7 options try switching the tubes brands and variations first. It may not make a big sonic difference though since the output is as a buffer and is probably only swinging a couple of volts.

Switching to different tube types would probably require tweaking resistor values.
  Reply With Quote
Old 19th June 2007, 06:20 AM   #3
diyAudio Member
 
beau2317's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Pukekohe, New Zealand
Yes I thought it quite weird. But I get the feeling that this was put in more as a marketing exercise than for any real reason (there are a couple of SS gain stages before this).

Also this sort of thing often happens when you get SS engineers asked to design tube bit. They look for a standard circuit and then use the most common tube..
__________________
Moskido (Hybrid Aikido/Mosfet). Verumecce (biased interconnects). Buffalo III with tube output
  Reply With Quote
Old 26th June 2007, 09:04 PM   #4
diyAudio Member
 
nuvistor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Richmond CA
I have a 1993 version of this DAC with the potted power transformer bearing the Alpha logo. I agree that the tubes are a marketing feature (gimmick?) but they do influence the sound, unfortunately the goal apparently was to add veiling and reduce clarity, probably to reduce the stridency of the typical CD of that time.

The 12AX7 CCS-loaded cathode follower is the output stage of an op-amp made of discrete components, using resistive-loaded small-signal NMOSFETs with NPN CCS for differential input pair, followed by PNP transistor VAS with Miller compensation loaded with NPN CCS, which drives the 12AX7s. The opamp DC output voltage is kept close to 0V with a servo loop using a 741 opamp. I replace the noisy MOSFETs with a matched JFET pair (U406) and after awhile replaced the 12AX7 cathode follower with a 5965 and then a JFET-NPN follower powered from the +15V rail.

You noticed that one 12AX7 is used per channel, the sections are wired in parallel.

If you want to stick with tubes for the output stage, I suggest something with higher gm that will take the 140V B+ and change the output CCS current set resistor to a lower value for more current to suit the new tube, I liked 5965 with CCS at about 8mA, but the higher filament current required reducing the value of a resistor in series with the filaments. You probably could use 12AU7 with somewhat less current. The higher plate current increases temperature of the plate voltage regulator, and the power transformer runs warmer, so you might want to remove the cover in use.

I thought the JFET-BJT follower sounded pretty close to the 5965 without running warmer.

Although I used matched JFETs, discrete JFETS like J201 or PN4302 would probably work OK since the servo compensates for the Vgs mismatch, the original NMOSFET pairs were not matched.

Another possibility is bypassing the op amp and connect the CS4328 output directly to the output jacks, it's specd to drive 600 ohms, but I haven't tried this.
  Reply With Quote
Old 27th June 2007, 01:20 AM   #5
diyAudio Member
 
beau2317's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Pukekohe, New Zealand
Thanks for that info. I tried all the tubes in my parts bin that would theoretically work, 12AU7, 12AT7, 6072A and found that the 12AU7 sounded best.

I am considering taking the output directly from the DAC as well as some other options.

Cheers
__________________
Moskido (Hybrid Aikido/Mosfet). Verumecce (biased interconnects). Buffalo III with tube output
  Reply With Quote
Old 28th June 2007, 04:51 PM   #6
diyAudio Member
 
beau2317's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Pukekohe, New Zealand
Wow I took the output directly from the DAC chip, with a 51R/10n filter and it sounds great. So much better than via the regular output.

Seems such a waste to put all those transistors and tubes in to make the sound so much worse.

Thanks for the tip.
__________________
Moskido (Hybrid Aikido/Mosfet). Verumecce (biased interconnects). Buffalo III with tube output
  Reply With Quote
Old 25th August 2010, 03:19 AM   #7
ar1617 is offline ar1617  Malaysia
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: KL
Quote:
Originally Posted by nuvistor View Post
I have a 1993 version of this DAC with the potted power transformer bearing the Alpha logo. I agree that the tubes are a marketing feature (gimmick?) but they do influence the sound, unfortunately the goal apparently was to add veiling and reduce clarity, probably to reduce the stridency of the typical CD of that time.

The 12AX7 CCS-loaded cathode follower is the output stage of an op-amp made of discrete components, using resistive-loaded small-signal NMOSFETs with NPN CCS for differential input pair, followed by PNP transistor VAS with Miller compensation loaded with NPN CCS, which drives the 12AX7s. The opamp DC output voltage is kept close to 0V with a servo loop using a 741 opamp. I replace the noisy MOSFETs with a matched JFET pair (U406) and after awhile replaced the 12AX7 cathode follower with a 5965 and then a JFET-NPN follower powered from the +15V rail.

You noticed that one 12AX7 is used per channel, the sections are wired in parallel.

If you want to stick with tubes for the output stage, I suggest something with higher gm that will take the 140V B+ and change the output CCS current set resistor to a lower value for more current to suit the new tube, I liked 5965 with CCS at about 8mA, but the higher filament current required reducing the value of a resistor in series with the filaments. You probably could use 12AU7 with somewhat less current. The higher plate current increases temperature of the plate voltage regulator, and the power transformer runs warmer, so you might want to remove the cover in use.

I thought the JFET-BJT follower sounded pretty close to the 5965 without running warmer.

Although I used matched JFETs, discrete JFETS like J201 or PN4302 would probably work OK since the servo compensates for the Vgs mismatch, the original NMOSFET pairs were not matched.

Another possibility is bypassing the op amp and connect the CS4328 output directly to the output jacks, it's specd to drive 600 ohms, but I haven't tried this.
hi nuvistor
sorry for digging this old thread up but I need some help as my Alpha dac is not working, no audio out although all the tubes are lit. Do you have the schematics?i beleieve mine is the older model w/o up24 bit.

Much appreciate if you do have the schematics that you could send my the file, my email lkk3110@hotmail.com

Much thks
  Reply With Quote
Old 25th August 2010, 04:20 AM   #8
diyAudio Member
 
nuvistor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Richmond CA
I don't have schematics, the circuit description I posted was from inspection of the PCB, which I removed to replace a bad power switching transistor. I inspected the op amp circuit only.

If you are troubleshooting this unit, I suggest you download copies of the Cirrus datasheets CS8412 and CS4328 and check the analog and digital signals. There is some digital logic near the CS8412 for digital source switching but I did not inspect it.
  Reply With Quote
Old 25th August 2010, 04:23 AM   #9
diyAudio Member
 
Wavebourn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Pleasant Hill, CA
Send a message via Skype™ to Wavebourn
Stick 6N6P there if filament supply permit.
__________________
The devil is not so terrible as his mathematical model!
Wavebourn: We Create Creativity!
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
California Audio Labs Gamma upgrades? G Digital Source 4 29th June 2011 10:04 AM
california audio labs CL-15 traverse deck r.terry Everything Else 0 14th June 2009 11:12 PM
Another California Audio Labs CL-5 Question neddyboy Digital Source 1 7th October 2007 12:06 PM
California Audio Labs Genesis lpd Digital Source 0 22nd November 2006 10:36 PM
Schematic California Audio Labs Aria MK III??? zabaltegi Digital Source 0 31st May 2005 08:50 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 01:33 PM.

Page generated in 0.12411 seconds (82.53% PHP - 17.47% MySQL) with 10 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio