Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Tubes / Valves
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum

diyAudio Sponsor

Search for a tube at thetubestore.com                            Product reviews and more

Audio tubes for any amplifier: from high end home audio to classic guitar amps.

Quick links by tube type: 12AX7, EL34, 6L6, KT66, 6550, KT88, EL84, 12AU7, 12AT7, 6922, 6H30, 300B, 6V6, 6SN7 

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 15th June 2007, 01:15 AM   #1
jarthel is offline jarthel  Australia
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: somewhere in Australia
Default power supply (cap input)

some circuit uses a very small value cap as cap input. But when simulating this on PSUD2, it seems the voltage on the 1st cap is very unstable.

Is there a reason for using such a small value?

I was looking at diyparadiso and one of their designs uses .1uF.

Thank you for the help
  Reply With Quote
Old 15th June 2007, 02:26 AM   #2
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Adelaide South Oz
Jarthel,
The size of the input cap on a CLC filter is very important. With low values like 0.1uF the supply will act very much like an LC supply but with that 0.1uF at least providing a bit of high frequency (solid state diode switch noise for example) filtering.

In my latest amp (6V6 Ultralinear drawing about 170mA for 2 channels) I used 5V4 recifier, off a 370-0-370 secondary, then a small cap, a 5H 200mA choke to 100uF/450V electrolytic and from there a separate feed via 10 Ohms to 60uF polypropylene for each channel.

I found very small values gave a high output voltage (up around 360V) as I increased the cap the voltage dropped and provided a minimum (around 310V) with a value at around 1 to 1.5uF and then started to increase again with the voltage back at near the 360V mark with a 10uF cap. I used 2uF as the final value to give me 315 to 320V.

PSUDII modelled that behaviour very well.

I would hazard a guess that this is because with the smaller cap the rectifier (switcher), cap and inductor acts like a switching boost supply. With a larger cap the switching function does not occur or ooccurs to a lesser degree as the capacitors strored charge is then sufficient to maintain a current flow into the inductor when the rectifier switches off.

Does that make any sense?

Cheers,
Ian

Cheers,
Ian
  Reply With Quote
Old 15th June 2007, 08:51 AM   #3
kopite is offline kopite  New Zealand
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: NZ
hi Ian, I was just wondering if the increased voltage was due to the 1st small cap being a PP type with a very low esr? Using a larger electro with an increased esr gave me a lower voltage when simulating. Thanks,
Phil.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
choke input power supply filter audionut Pass Labs 49 29th January 2012 05:38 PM
Has anyone using LC input in their power supply? jarthel Pass Labs 27 7th April 2008 09:02 AM
Any interest in GC input buffer and power supply regulator pcb's? Sheldon Chip Amps 149 3rd August 2004 01:24 AM
Choke input Power Supply NickC Solid State 4 6th November 2002 07:41 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 02:56 AM.

Page generated in 0.06160 seconds (81.57% PHP - 18.43% MySQL) with 10 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio