|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum |
| diyAudio Sponsor | ||
|
|
||
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Southern Germany
|
Well,
in my attempt to build my third headphone amplifier (aikido this time) I am planning to use two toroids for B+ and the heaters. They are both 80VA units since the heaters ( two 6CG7, two 6H30) are drawing about 2.8A , the other toroid for the B+ is well overdimensioned. I' ve breadboarded the psu and immediately wanted to check some voltages...and here things are getting ...err...strange. Both toroids have two 115V primaries with the secondaries being 2x12V for the heaters (regulated supply with 'dropper resistor' and LM1084) and 2x55V for HT. To start with the HT I put the primaries in parallel and the secondaries in series, connected the whole thing to our 230V line voltage hoping to arrive at 220V after my filter network (byv99, CRCRC). As load I used around 4k WW resistors...I really don't know whether putting 230V on two paralleled 115V windings is a good idea or even a definite no-no, but I am getting around 172V AC before the filter network and basically nothing after the rectifier diodes...? To make the situation really strange i measured the voltages of the other toroid (primaries in series, sec's in parallel)without load, hoping to see 15V+... Well, I'm having around 190V here!! Q. Am I missing something important?? Q. Am I......................dumb?? Clueless so far, Oliver PS. MY DMM seems to be okay since I checked voltages on my MJ this weekend... Edit: corrected typos |
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Tomball Texas
|
You need to series connect the primarys not parallel them for doubled pri voltage.
Nick |
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Cool end of a soldering iron NW of Toronto
|
Quote:
Really, such language! Isn`t poof on the restricted words list here? Sounds like it shud be, since there seems to be a law against common and very useful soft, not even swear words here that appear in dictionaries as legitimate parts of our contemporary language lexicon. I can complain, therefore I am.
__________________
I.Q.Test. Have you ever purchased a recreational snowmobile? |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Eire
|
As Miles says you can't get you wanted 220V that way. If you apply a load the waveform will be badly clipped. You will have to try and work out a voltage doubler power supply.
Shoog |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: flyover country
|
You definitely don't want to exceed the primary voltage rating on a transformer. If you haven't already let the magic smoke out, correct that first.
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Southern Germany
|
Thank you everybody for putting my head straight....
after some further reading on the subject I also realize that my plan was overly ambitious. Luckily no harm was done and no xformers pxxxxxxd... I'll ry a voltage doubler instead or have a custom toroid made. |
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: new zealand
|
Quote:
Hi. I was interested in this comment above. The important thing here is not the voltage per se. it is the VA rating of the transformer that is important, so if the voltage is doubled and the current take is halved, then no saturation problems should occur. what you then have to be careful about is the insulation, both between windings, and layers. the following transformer equation highlights the point: VA = 4.44 x B x F x I x ff x Sf x L x H x T x S 1,000,000 Where :- VA = volt amps, or watts rating of the completed transformer, 4.44 is a constant for all equations, B is the magnetic field strength in Tesla, F is the frequency of the mains, I is the current density in the copper, and we will allow 3.0 amps per square mm, ff is the fill factor, ie, the fraction of copper area in the core window, Sf is the stacking factor of the laminations, since there ia a coating of insulation, so about 0.95, L is the length of the core winding window, H is the height of the core winding window, T is the core tongue width, S is the core stack height, 1,000,000 is a constant for all equations. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
|
Toroids are fussy creatures.
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: new zealand
|
Quote:
I suspect that he connected the two primaries up anti-phase so that they cancelled each other out. My basic premise that voltage across a primary does nothing to the saturation still holds, it is the current through a coil that determines the flux density, and as shown in the transformer equation bill |
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Trade a 40V 400VA Toroid for 20V 300VA Toroid | john65b | Swap Meet | 7 | 10th October 2006 03:49 AM |
| Here is a weird one | mashaffer | Solid State | 2 | 26th March 2006 12:23 AM |
| Hooking up Charlize to the PC power supply, with some weird results | eVITAERC | Class D | 24 | 18th November 2005 05:09 PM |
| new cables, weird results | idqracing | Multi-Way | 8 | 22nd February 2005 09:48 PM |
| weird | karma | Everything Else | 1 | 26th May 2004 03:10 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.09756 seconds (87.76% PHP - 12.24% MySQL) with 11 queries |