Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Tubes / Valves
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum

diyAudio Sponsor

Search for a tube at thetubestore.com                            Product reviews and more

Audio tubes for any amplifier: from high end home audio to classic guitar amps.

Quick links by tube type: 12AX7, EL34, 6L6, KT66, 6550, KT88, EL84, 12AU7, 12AT7, 6922, 6H30, 300B, 6V6, 6SN7 

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 23rd May 2007, 05:08 PM   #1
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Fossano/CN
Default EL81/6CJ6 operating point

Hello,

Sorry to stress you guys again with my strange questions, bud does anyone knows a suitable operating point for a g2 driven EL81 push-pull? I am thinking to build the preamp section following the Berning EA230 schematic.... The problem, as usual, is the required plate to plate load for the 2 EL81, the negative g1 voltage and the b+ voltage to the plates

Thanks again

Giulio Maiocco
  Reply With Quote
Old 24th May 2007, 06:36 PM   #2
ilimzn is offline ilimzn  Croatia
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Zagreb
This is not a simple problem as it is possible to find many operating points given the variety of possible combinations of -Vg1 and Vg2. In theory, an extensive drawing of curves for variuos -Vg1 could give you a sweet-spot.

Another approach would be to make an educated guess.
Have a look at the datasheet at:
http://www.mif.pg.gda.pl/homepages/f...030/p/PL81.pdf
Speciffically page 6 (class B PP operating point example) and page 12 (G2 curves for Vg1 = -1V). As you will see, the Vg2 curves are similar to pentode curves so the pentode class B operating point could be used, perhaps with a higher V plate and higher P-P load. For lower Vg1 the required Vg2 will be lower, ditto Vg1, but the linearity might be worse.
  Reply With Quote
Old 24th May 2007, 08:01 PM   #3
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Fossano/CN
Hello,

This probably will show that I'm completely ignorant when it comes the need to use the tube curves, but could what I "drawn" possibly work without melting the E/PL81?

I have quite a lot of them, but I'm always disappointed when I have to junk tubes! Just telling you a "funny" thing, last week I had to trash 3 Sylvania 6L6GC

Also, plese could some kind soul explain me how to calculate the optimum plate to plate load starting from the curves of the tube? Please, no difficult math, as I have a hard time figuring how it works!


Regards

Giulio Maiocco
Attached Images
File Type: jpg pl81 g2 driven.jpg (93.9 KB, 260 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 24th May 2007, 11:14 PM   #4
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Adelaide South Oz
Look on Patrick Turner's webpages.

http://www.turneraudio.com.au/

Click on the Educational and DIY page. All you ever wanted to know about load matching.

Cheers,
Ian
  Reply With Quote
Old 25th May 2007, 12:54 AM   #5
rdf is online now rdf  Canada
diyAudio Member
 
rdf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: big smoke
Quote:
Originally posted by Giulio Maiocco
This probably will show that I'm completely ignorant when it comes the need to use the tube curves, but could what I "drawn" possibly work without melting the E/PL81?
Not without a liquid nitrogen bath, the datasheet specifies an anode dissipation limit of 8 watts. Start by plotting points on the screen characteristics where Va*Ia=8. I think you'll find almost the entire usable area falls into uncharted territory beneath the Vg2 = 100 trace.
And what gingertube says.
__________________
Ears aren't microphones.
  Reply With Quote
Old 25th May 2007, 01:16 PM   #6
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Fossano/CN
Hello,

Thanks a lot for the link about the plate to plate load calculations, I have to read it again and "experiment", as for now it is still a bit fuzzy.

Anyway, I tried to do the "plot" for the EL81 and it seems it is not one of the best tubes to be used in audio applications, mainly because of the very low anode dissipation! I traced the plate dissipation on the graph, it is hand- drawn, so not much precision!

Is this time the "plot" right or should I correct something else?

Cheers

Giulio Maiocco
Attached Images
File Type: jpg pl81 g2 driven1.jpg (88.2 KB, 214 views)
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Calculating operating point of a DHT Pyre Tubes / Valves 2 26th February 2009 10:09 PM
Operating point for 6GK5 AKSA Tubes / Valves 6 6th October 2008 03:21 PM
SE amp: Please suggest a better operating point zobsky Tubes / Valves 34 21st September 2008 12:00 AM
Best Operating point for a 2A3? sgerus Tubes / Valves 10 2nd August 2006 12:31 AM
6GM8 Operating Point ALBQ Tubes / Valves 2 23rd November 2004 02:45 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 02:47 AM.

Page generated in 0.08908 seconds (78.28% PHP - 21.72% MySQL) with 11 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio