Adding secondary of output transformer into cathodes of output stage ? Eico ST-70 - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Tubes / Valves
Home Forums Rules Articles diyAudio Store Gallery Wiki Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 21st April 2007, 04:32 PM   #1
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: S.C.
Default Adding secondary of output transformer into cathodes of output stage ? Eico ST-70

Hi I have been restoring a Eico st-70 and have been happy with its performance. I want to try some enhancements to see if the performance / sound can be better yet.
1. I wanted to put the secondary of the output tranformer into the output chothodes and could not decide if it should be in phase or out of phase with the primary. If its out of phase that will introduce negitive feedback and run the risk of motorboating.
If its in phase you might get slightly higher power output output with higher distortion.
What is the correct way???
Also Macintosh made inagrated amp called the ma230 that looks like a copy of the eico's amp stage .
2. Are there any benifits to adding a CCS to the LTP phase splitter ?
Looks like it would add a new cap in the signal path but may also have better balance.

Thanks in advance for any thoughts on this.

  Reply With Quote
Old 21st April 2007, 04:56 PM   #2
SY is offline SY  United States
On Hiatus
SY's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Chicagoland
Blog Entries: 2
The phase splitter CCS is a very good idea for this amp. You need to balance the plate resistors and and the grid leaks of the output stage (that means you'll lose the balancing control and need to use matched output tubes).

I wouldn't go the cathode feedback route for this amp; what you pick up in output stage distortion reduction you lose in making the driver swing the extra voltage.
"You tell me whar a man gits his corn pone, en I'll tell you what his 'pinions is."
  Reply With Quote
Old 21st April 2007, 06:08 PM   #3
rdf is offline rdf  Canada
diyAudio Member
rdf's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: big smoke
Default Re: Adding secondary of output transformer into cathodes of output stage ? Eico ST-70

Cathode feedback might not be possible. Being push-pull it requires two closely matched anti-phase returns from the secondary taps to the two output cathodes. The schematics show the 16, 8, 4 and C secondary taps. You need to find three adjacent taps such that:

- the two outside taps drive the speaker with a proper impedance match
- the centre tap can be grounded (removing the ground on the 4 ohm tap if it doesn't remain centre)
- the signals between the grounded tap and each outside tap are closely matched in amplitude and phase shift across a wide range of frequencies into the ultrasonic.

I tried this on a 7591 p-p amp (70 volt taps though, heavy return) which in its current config is down about 6 dB at 110 kHz into a resistive load. However at high frequencies the phase difference between the two feedback windings shifted more than 90 degrees and the feedback went positive. The 7591 makes a very effective 55kHz oscillator. Cathode feedback is much easier applied to single-ended outputs.

Re: the LTP, I may be missing something but if the DC currents remain identical why is a coupling cap required? Start up conditions?
  Reply With Quote
Old 21st April 2007, 06:15 PM   #4
diyAudio Member
Wavebourn's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Pleasant Hill, CA
Send a message via Skype™ to Wavebourn
Use cathode feedback if you feel you need better woofer damping, otherwise leave it as is because as SY said you'll get less GNFB gain as the result, and who knows which distortions sound nastier in the particular amp, output stage's or driver's errors.
The Devil is not so terrible as his math model is!
  Reply With Quote


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Transformer-driven SEPP output stage. Circlotron Solid State 17 20th February 2015 03:22 PM
Laszlo's Valve Output Stage with Lundahl transformer lcsaszar Digital Source 21 4th October 2010 12:12 PM
3C24 in a SE output stage - output transformer impedance recommendation !!! aldovan Tubes / Valves 15 6th September 2008 10:18 AM
Adding more transistors to output stage? bowdown Solid State 6 19th January 2007 07:15 PM

New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 05:28 AM.

vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2017 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2017 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2