|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Michigan
|
Hello everybody!
The Michigan Technological University Audio Engineering Soceity is having an equipment listening session this sunday, and I have agreed to bring my EL34 SET amp along. I want the amp sounding its absolute best, so I am tweaking it. The first thing I did was take measurements to make sure everything was on spec (it is ).After measuring everything, I took off the Cathode Feedback, The amp's Midrange came to life, however the bass died a painfull death. So this leads me to thinking. What if I use One capacitor to bypass all of the high frequencies to gound, and another Capacitor to allow all the low frequencies to to become part of a cathode feeback loop. I even came up with a schematic in eagle to show everyone what I am thinking about, now, as you see this, you must understand that this schematic only shows the bias circuitry, not the entire output stage Will this work? Does it look like a good idea? I know I will have to be carfull picking capacitor values, and The CK will have to be far smaller than CF (see Schematic). my other questions about this are dependent on the fact that it will work, How do I find the impedances to base the cap values off of? Any help would be sooo apreciated |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
|
Welcome to the world of tone controls!
If you can measure frequency response, this would be a good and educational time to do so. Ck may have far less effect than you think until you make it big enough to defeat its own purpose.
__________________
If there's a sucker born every minute, where do the rest of them come from? |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Michigan
|
okay, I have no fancy equipment or anything, however Another tube-head and I got together with some sweeps, and tones and saw which frequencies appeard to be dropping out. It appears that anything below ~80hz is just soft, quiet, and fluffy.
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Michigan
|
Will anything bad happen if I just start playing around with this? because I think that is what I am going to do, just play around...
|
|
|
|
#5 | ||
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
Also, think of frequency dependent load of the amp by capacitors across the speaker... Quote:
__________________
If I disappear suddenly, that means I finally created a time machine and pushed wrong button that brought me to Stalin's Russia. In any experiment any result is the result. Even if it is negative. |
||
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: big smoke
|
Quote:
Consider a little resistance (50-75 ohms) between Cf and Ck to start. You won't lose much degeneration and the amp will see a much friendlier load. |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Michigan
|
does anyone have any idea where to start picking CK anf CF values?
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
__________________
If I disappear suddenly, that means I finally created a time machine and pushed wrong button that brought me to Stalin's Russia. In any experiment any result is the result. Even if it is negative. |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Michigan
|
Okay, this is what I am thinking now However I need to figure out the impedance of this system so I can pick values.
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: SoCal
|
keep in mind the frequencies with more feedback will have less gain. So you will have to add gain to the low freq's somewhere upstream.
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Cathode Feedback from Secondary for PP Amp | gingertube | Tubes / Valves | 22 | 1st July 2009 11:45 PM |
| Cathode feedback on the simple SE | ixe13 | Tubes / Valves | 0 | 23rd April 2009 11:52 PM |
| 300B Cathode Feedback + Cathode Bias | korneluk | Tubes / Valves | 13 | 7th January 2009 08:07 PM |
| Cathode Feedback How-To? | sorenj07 | Tubes / Valves | 4 | 23rd October 2007 05:04 AM |
| Cathode feedback | mark_titano | Tubes / Valves | 20 | 11th August 2005 01:56 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |