|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum |
| diyAudio Sponsor | ||
|
|
||
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Beograd, Serbia
|
Hi everybody.It is obvious what schematics I m looking for.Tubemaster s el84 se direct coupled and Morrison 2a3 are both interesting , but el34 and it s 5 watts are a temptation I can not ressist... but to look for.Thanks .
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Plainsboro, NJ
|
You say you like the DC coupled EL84 circuit, but want more power. EL34s are harder to drive than EL84s. OTOH, 7591s are as easy to drive as EL84s, a fact that Fisher and Scott took full advantage of.
What Fisher and Scott did, you can do too. 7591s are in production at Saratov and Jamona.
__________________
Eli D. |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Beograd, Serbia
|
Thanks, I ll try to learn obout 7591 . 813 transmiting pentode is very interesting too, representing easy job for driver tube and could give 20 w in triode mode.BUT ... a good output tranies of that power are too expensive , and I don t have directcoupled schematics for it. I m newbie , so I can t calculate desired cirquit ...yet. Thanks again.
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
|
Hi !
Sure, EL34's are harder to drive than EL84's, but can't it be done with two halves of a ECC81 parallel ? I'd really like a schematic for a direct coupled EL34 SE using ECC81 driver, but is it possible ? Cheers, Empee
__________________
In the end, all is good If it's not good, it's not the end |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
|
c'mon, guys ?!
nobody on a direct coupled EL34 ? cheers, Empee <edit:> Ok, so I found this.... That cap isn't in the signal pad (or is it? someone once told me; "anything in there affects the signal") but it seems direct coupled, and using 12at7 & el34 will this be any good ? Cheers again ! :-)
__________________
In the end, all is good If it's not good, it's not the end |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
|
OK, sorry for the above post...
I looked closer and saw my mistake; half #1 of the 12AT7 is actually driver stage, coupled via the cap, half #2 of the 12AT7 is for distorsion purposes... so no good for my apllication However, I found attached shematic ! Now this IS dc-coupled but it uses a 6H23 tube, wich would be close to an ECC88... can this schematic be re-worked for a 12AT7 / ECC81 ? Cheers, Empee
__________________
In the end, all is good If it's not good, it's not the end |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
|
really nobody on a EL34 SE, driven by a ECC81 ?
can't it be done ?
__________________
In the end, all is good If it's not good, it's not the end |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
|
Why do you want direct coupled, to avoid the capacitors? What about C3, C4?
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
|
Well,
not to completely avoid caps, (I do not think it's possible) but surely to minimize their effect by reducing their number... So far I only found one schematic using an 12at7/ecc81, but this one isn't DC coupled... still a nice schematic, I think Cheers, Empee
__________________
In the end, all is good If it's not good, it's not the end |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
|
I think being able to use smaller caps is good because they can be film and not electrolytic. Your latest schematic looks better in this one regard.
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| capacitor coupled vs. direct coupled ouput | hugobross | Solid State | 11 | 21st January 2011 02:56 AM |
| 6sn7 direct coupled and transformer coupled | neazoi | Tubes / Valves | 3 | 23rd May 2008 04:30 PM |
| 6922 direct coupled to 2A3 | gabriel611 | Tubes / Valves | 16 | 15th March 2006 10:25 AM |
| My first amp - a direct coupled 2A3 | Wardsweb | Tubes / Valves | 51 | 3rd August 2003 05:22 AM |
| Can someone explain parafeed & direct coupled & a.c. coupled? | mwmitchell | Tubes / Valves | 2 | 11th September 2002 02:10 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.10714 seconds (80.89% PHP - 19.11% MySQL) with 11 queries |