|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Tubelab Discussion and support of Tubelab products, prototypes and experiments |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#11 | ||
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
Quote:
If you go with the second option, you just use two "normal" OPTs, one for each tube. |
||
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Those SE output transformers are very expensive. Choke-loaded parafeed may reduce some cost, which is my plan.
Yoshi |
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
This PSE project has already been completed.
major modifications - "pseudo choke input" power supply - only one 5842 connected to two caps, as suggested by Tubelab - RC added between B+ and 2SK2700s - two anode load chokes (60H) per channel - pp (parafeed) transformer with two separate primary windings (signals merged only on secondary) I am very happy with the mono PSE amps driving my hybrid ESL speakers. Thank you all for the comments. Y |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Tubelab SE vs Simple SE | Pez | Tubelab | 25 | 29th October 2011 02:16 AM |
| What is the dimentions of the TubeLab SE board??? | djn | Tubelab | 2 | 1st March 2010 11:37 PM |
| Why not invert the Tubelab SE board? | BillEpstein | Tubes / Valves | 5 | 19th October 2009 02:12 AM |
| Second Tubelab Simple SE board done | budmaestro | Tubes / Valves | 0 | 24th July 2008 12:18 AM |
| Difference btw SE and PSE. | protos | Tubes / Valves | 61 | 13th January 2004 06:03 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.06683 seconds (73.47% PHP - 26.53% MySQL) with 10 queries |