Go Back   Home > Forums > >
Home Forums Rules Articles diyAudio Store Blogs Gallery Wiki Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

The Lounge A place to talk about almost anything but politics and religion.

Internet VS Hollywood: how is it possible?
Internet VS Hollywood: how is it possible?
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 17th January 2012, 10:05 PM   #1
Wavebourn is offline Wavebourn  United States
Designer & Technologist
diyAudio Member
Wavebourn's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Pleasant Hill, CA
Internet VS Hollywood: how is it possible?
Question Internet VS Hollywood: how is it possible?

This post is not about politics, it is about technical problems.

The main problem is, in order for this legislation to work the entire Internet has to be reorganized, in it's foundation that was proposed by DARPA as self-healing network organized by totally independent nodes. It was organized to sustain nuclear war. The idea of centralization in such case would be killing. Now when Internet is up and running, Hollywood that don't understand how it works requested simply to control it. It is not possible, unless everything will be reorganized, instead of self-healing, self-sustaining unbreakable network, into a hierarchical structure.
When experts tried to explain to congressmen details, the answer was simple, like, "We are not hackers and don't want to know how it works, it is your business". Similarly, to create new law for birds to fly under water, and does not matter how they would do that. Or, to demand from fish to fly in the sky, saying that it is birds' and fish problem, we don't have enough knowledge to understand how you will do that, but it is not our job, our job is to tell you what to do, but how to do is your problem..

Do you see what resources will be needed, and how it can be reorganized in order to comply to new legislations?
I don't. If to reorganize DNS system by hierarchical principle, it will be still DNS system, unless software on all computers in the world will be replaced.
The Devil is not so terrible as his math model is!
  Reply With Quote
Old 17th January 2012, 10:26 PM   #2
revboden is offline revboden  United States
diyAudio Member
revboden's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2011
It's not possible.

edit: snapshot of one backbone node.

This cannot be made into a liner system.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 768px-Internet_map_1024.jpg (202.3 KB, 236 views)

Last edited by revboden; 17th January 2012 at 10:32 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 17th January 2012, 11:15 PM   #3
tvrgeek is offline tvrgeek  United States
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Md
Difficult issues, difficult technology. Long winded comment.

Here is the real catch-22. If the Web existed within the confines of one sovereignty, their normal IP laws and tort processes could resolve the problems. However, one nations desire to protect IP may be the next's strategic advantage. Pandora's box is indeed open.

There are various tagging technologies, but to use them in a global environment would require a global PKI system at levels as we have seen are not sustainable. Even if one could manage an international tagging system, then you have several more problems. Lost keys and the inability to share in the intellectual arena as anything considered IP would be tagged. No one is willing to put up the cost. It would create a serious detriment to what the internet was designed to do, and what it can do now. Just think of the traffic that tagging every tweet would cause?

I would like to see international cooperation similar to our post office laws that addresses out right fraud and serious criminal activity. Unfortunately, as the EU is learning really fast, this means giving up some sovereignty. First world is not willing, after all we are the bullies. Third world won't as they are trying to establish their position. Everyone in the middle is getting stepped on anyway. Unfair now, it would be more unfair if we tried.

So, let's look at the strengths and see if we can beat the game. Let's split the problem in two. Theft and sharing of protected entertainment. Hollywood. Theft of corporate and personal IP. ID theft, technology etc.

For the first, I offer the concept of rapid deployment of expendable content. Make your content pay off very quickly and don't worry about the tail. Make your content so cheap, and your legal distribution so easy, the incentive is not there to bypass it. Look what has happened with 99 cent music! I would rather collect a dollar from a million people that ten from a thousand and spend all the profits trying to stop the rest of the million who stole it.

DNS is another rat's nest. Sorry to say, it ran better when a few geeks at Stanford just took care of it. If I had an answer, I would share it.

The second problem is actually easier to manage. My profession has to get off their lazy tails and do their job protecting their company asserts. The worlds is being held ransom by a bunch of half-brain script kiddies because the professionals are not. This would reduce the problem to a scope where existing international IP laws could manage it. China, yes even the great master of organized IP theft, has started to realize this is not sustainable. If they steal us into poverty, we won't have any money to buy their products.

Listing rat's nests, every nation is having the same issues with putting vital infrastructure in the web and as we have seen, it is almost impossible to protect. As shown in the Middle East, even air-gaps do not make you totally safe. So no easy or legal solution there. Just hard work.

Some hold "the cloud" up as a technical solution. Sorry. It has the advantage of FINALLY allowing mere intelligent mortals to access resources via appliance type devices. You should not have to be a computer scientist just to keep a PC going. I am, and some times I can't. What we can do maybe, is hold application distributors ( iStore and the like) liable for gross negligence when distributing malware. (Android, take note, at least Apple tries). Right now, the end user has no rights at all. I think this is an opportunity for tort law under the suitability for use clause.

If we were all as noble as Gandhi, we would not have this problem. Were not. We are only normal greedy people. I think we will work this all out. It takes time. A lot of loss will incur. A lot of that loss was only there to be made due to the advantages of the internet in the first place. I suggest companies quit paying the legal department as much and pay more security engineers and content producers. The goal is to make more money. If you can accept the leakage and produce far more, the total is still better.

Wow, an e-mail says I just won the lottery, all I have to do is give them my bank account. Funny, I didn't enter any lottery
  Reply With Quote
Old 18th January 2012, 04:12 AM   #4
tomtt is online now tomtt
diyAudio Member
tomtt's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: kansas city mo, and on occasion, around the world ...
Originally Posted by Wavebourn View Post

unless software on all computers in the world will be replaced.
this may be what the 'cloud' is geared for ...

`````````````````````````````````````````````````` ```````````

cloud free -

Click the image to open in full size.
  Reply With Quote
Old 18th January 2012, 05:24 AM   #5
Richard Ellis is offline Richard Ellis  Argentina
diyAudio Member
Richard Ellis's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Mar del Plata, a BIG seasonal getaway city, can see the Ocean from our residence.
That nodal structure looks very much like brain-matter neuron structures..?????
That being the case, If the "net" ever became self-aware we soon might be under the auspices of the "Great Almighty"............& I'm not talking about any ancient Deities......something more modern.

__________________________________________________ ____Rick..........
  Reply With Quote
Old 18th January 2012, 10:23 AM   #6
godfrey is offline godfrey  South Africa
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Cape Town
Originally Posted by Wavebourn View Post
This post is not about politics, it is about technical problems.

The main problem is, in order for this legislation to work the entire Internet has to be reorganized...
Originally Posted by revboden View Post
It's not possible...
No, there is no technical problem. Some countries already severely restrict the content available to their citizens, and have no difficulty doing so.

Closer to home, you might like to look at the USA's "War on gambling". Websites have been blocked, people have been sent to prison.

IMHO, the proposed legislation would likely make corporate abuse of "the system" easier, nastier and more common, without having much of an effect on real piracy. For those who want to, it's possible to work around things like domain name seizure and DNS blacklisting.

There are already freely available plugins for Firefox to help with this sort of thing. Of course if the new legislation is passed, it would be a criminal offense for me to name them here.

Well, today's not a good day to look anything up on Wikipedia, but I found an interesting perspective here:
In her January 2010 speech announcing the State Department's Internet Freedom Initiative, Hillary laid out some of the foreign "threats to the free flow of information" that she wished to prevent in the future. "In Vietnam, access to popular social networking sites has suddenly disappeared," she said. "And last Friday in Egypt, 30 bloggers and activists were detained."


But circumvention tools - which allow activists to foil internet censors and evade government surveillance - would be the bill's greatest casualties. While many are developed explicitly for human rights advocates, they can also be used to download copyrighted content. Tor, the anonymising software that masks users' IP addresses that was instrumental during Egypt protests, would be a prime target of copyright holders, despite being funded by the US government.

In fact, most of internet freedom programmes currently funded by State Department are in danger. Hillary has pledged millions of dollars to various companies to create a "shadow" internet "that dissidents can use to undermine repressive governments", according to the New York Times. But by endorsing SOPA, Hillary is giving the green light to copyright holders to destroy it. Virtual Private Networks, proxies, privacy or anonymisation software could all potentially be deemed illegal if they can also help get around SOPA's censorship mechanisms.
Also lots of good info on the Electronic Frontier Foundation site.
cDc communications seems surprisingly quiet, though

Last edited by godfrey; 18th January 2012 at 10:31 AM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 18th January 2012, 10:40 AM   #7
DF96 is offline DF96  England
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2007
I think Wavebourn's opening post sums it up. You can't have an open network with restrictions. Politicians hate being out of control of something. Any levers which can stop IP theft can also stop freedom. The real answer is to go for the sites putting up the infringeing content, but they will be off-shore. Reducing the price of legitimate copies may help.

Another solution is to try and educate people about property rights. Stealing IP is now socially accepted behaviour by anyone under about 40 in most countries, and anyone of any age in some countries.

Many years ago in Britain we had a big problem with drink-driving. We didn't solve it by banning alcohol, or banning driving. We solved it by catching the drink-drivers, and making it a socially unacceptable thing to do (in most places).
  Reply With Quote
Old 18th January 2012, 02:19 PM   #8
bear is offline bear
expert in tautology
diyAudio Member
bear's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: New York State USA
Internet VS Hollywood: how is it possible?
it is hopeless, those who seek to control will always seek to control. those who do not wish to be controlled will always be their enemies. thus the struggle is framed. it matters NOT if one "side" or the other is more correct or not.

this is a question more akin to "free speech" and "banning books". while on one hand there are "profits" being "lost" by the alleged "theft" of IP, on the other hand billions of $$ are being made via the same technology. this is a shift. those whose interests are entrenched in the old past ways of doing things always resist and fight the newer ways. this is especially true of those who are unable to directly benefit and capitalize on the new ways.

also there are the desires of many to control political discourse, information and change.

communication is power, always has been, always will be. controlling the channels of communication is one major way that the masses are kept in line, no matter where in the world you are.

this is a serious and dangerous time, as the freedom of communication that has been enjoyed for some time is being threatened, and I fear most of those freedoms will be lost shortly.

this renaissance will be seen as having been short-lived...

http://www.bearlabs.com -- Btw, I don't actually know anything, FYI -- every once in a while I say something that makes sense... ]
  Reply With Quote
Old 18th January 2012, 02:34 PM   #9
JRKO is offline JRKO
diyAudio Member
JRKO's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: U.K.
Send a message via AIM to JRKO
I think wikipedia has shown the way.

All it will take is some rather large companies to stand up & withdraw their services for 24 hours and the powers that be (and want to be in Hollywoods case) may take notice.

Maybe a telecoms provider - who feels it is unfair for them to be penalised because someone on their network hosts 'illegal' date - just closes the network for an hour or so - $billions of work hours lost that are easily equal to the what Hollywood 'thinks' they are losing out on
If I'm not making noise, I'm making something to make noise
  Reply With Quote
Old 18th January 2012, 02:51 PM   #10
boris81 is offline boris81  United States
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: white plains, ny
It's impossible to have strict regulation AND an open society.
One's gotta give.
  Reply With Quote


Internet VS Hollywood: how is it possible?Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Hollywood Movie Awards thadman The Lounge 0 6th October 2010 01:56 AM
Internet Research Only arthur Thompson Multi-Way 50 6th October 2008 07:35 AM
Internet explorer 6 ash_dac The Lounge 17 10th July 2006 06:05 PM
Realmagic hollywood plus pcm1725 mods? ash_dac Digital Source 0 22nd August 2005 09:33 PM
Internet Explorer 6.0 Christian Everything Else 154 10th December 2002 09:18 AM

New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 09:52 PM.

Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2017 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Resources saved on this page: MySQL 15.00%
vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2017 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright ©1999-2017 diyAudio