This is a good example ( i am jumping in for Wayne ) :Belafonte at Carnegie Hall - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Only 2 years younger than me.
No idea how they did that 3D trick.
HE IS THERE, AND YOU ARE THERE:
Somehow my CD copy is low noise too.
No DOLBY no nothing. That is a miracle.
Only 2 years younger than me.
No idea how they did that 3D trick.
HE IS THERE, AND YOU ARE THERE:
Somehow my CD copy is low noise too.
No DOLBY no nothing. That is a miracle.
This one too :The Dark Side of the Moon - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
It is one of the only 2 CD´s i have that can burn out tweeters.
The other is a Mark Levinson drum recording.
I have no idea how they got such dynamics on an anlog tape but it is there to behold.
It is one of the only 2 CD´s i have that can burn out tweeters.
The other is a Mark Levinson drum recording.
I have no idea how they got such dynamics on an anlog tape but it is there to behold.
Here you see the tape recorder he used :http://www.danielhertz.com/media/biography/MusicMan2.pdf
With a liitle help of JC i asume.
With a liitle help of JC i asume.
Crank it and burn your tweeters :CollectorsFrenzy - Bill Elgart percussion drum Mark Levinson audiophile LP
Good night.
Good night.
That is pretty exceptional...... resolution.
Haha, anything in audio can be called "resolution".
Amplitude, time, phase, microphone, frequency extension, sinc function, tap length, DSD / 1-bit.
It's all called rezolution.
Appreciate your story.
You may like the quote......
"Entertain that anything is possible, until proven otherwise".
I saw it here — Questions For Skeptics
Will look it up.
Yes, this interest is about listening.
Some people value measurements above listening, as "the machine doesn't lie", they think their own mind lies more than the machine.
Today I read that it's nearly impossible to see 2% distortion in a scope......?
dsd
If you like numbers here is something I found by accident. It is said 12 would be the ideal numbers of finger for us as the maths would be easier. This might ignore the fact that the Fibonacci number is more related to 5, If I am not mistaken ( root5 +1 )/2 = 1.6180339887499 if my phone knows what it is doing. The number is the more efficient way for bees to collect honey if using that maths to create pseudo random patterns. Hunting dogs also cover more area quickly with the same strategies using the nose to fill in the gaps . That is aside from the shape of sea shells etc.
Any two numbers as long as one is not zero ( I like that ) can derive the number and is a similar number of steps. The 10th power = 123 ( 122.99 to infinity) ! Using 1 and 1000 is nice ( not unlike patterns of number 9 ). 11th = 199 12th = 322 13 th = 521. 1.2 ( PHi squared ) = 3.141607 circa 0.0015 % error to Pi. Pi cubed is 31.006276603 so almost 31. If Phi and Pi were easily linked that would be interesting.
0.6180339887499 1.6180339887499 2.6180339887499 Powers -1,1, 2. As we all know to power 0 is always 1 so of no great importance ( discuss , universal number origin point ). 1.6180339887499 is the most real number I know of. All irrational numbers are , root 2 especially ( see tan 45 root 2 +/- 1). 0 and infinity are concepts as far as I can see.
Quite apart from theist and atheist arguments these numbers are real and give life the best chance. The maths are as near as we will get to understanding specifically as these are things that divide so many people. Maths is a region you can reasonably trust. It even has number that are accepted as irrational. It also has non existent numbers just to help us visualize. 0 and infinity a useful fiction to make reality clearer. The subjective raised to a science and art form. Where else in science is a fiction vital and so well understood? Digital proved this. The more we need a zero the more we realize we can't have it.
The problem with measurements is they sometimes blind us to the fact that what we have designed is not very good. The classic is the crossover phase shift. There is no right or wrong. It is always wrong. That was until DSP and whatever phase shift required. I hate to admit it, that is the future.
Paramount 320 Theatre Organ
Back in the '70s, we did a design for a Japanese cartridge company that built the first stage of amplification into the headshell (used CM860 FETs, the quietest we could find in 1978). It would be even easier to do these days.
Yes, 1.618 is a real phenomenon, in photo editing it's called "the rule of thirds", you crop an image so the focal points align to the intersections at a third of the width / height. 16:10 video format and the dimensions of a credit card vaguely follow 1.618 as well, as well as lots of advertising, company logos. An art student made the Nike swoosh logo, if I recall he requested around $550 USD for it, I should look it up but I'm on my phone right now.
Either way I hope he didn't consume his paycheck for the Nike logotype in Vegas the next day.
I once knew an art student with a focus on fonts and she would spend around 2 weeks designing a T-shirt, she'd make a few dozen variations on her computer and then narrow down on the most appealing design.
I didn't know that bees use 1.618, I will look that up later.
I can highly recommend the youtube channel "numberphile", I loved his explanation of the use of the word billion and his promotion of the words "milliard" and "billiard".
If you like numbers I have a good one, the number 26. This number is situated directly between a square and a cube.
5x5 = 25
3x3x3 = 27
Try to find another number directly adjacent to a square and a cube.
If you can't find any, try to prove that none exist, now that is the hard part and it's little riddles like these which can lead to the escapism of some numberphiles / mathematicians.
According to Bjork, the singer, she says musicians quite often like mathematics. Physicists like drama, good dancers often have a large vocabulary and chess players, well they can very easily learn new games like Shogi, Igo, checkers or Texas Hold'em.
I seem to recall Michael Jordan became a baseball player and then a golf player.
There's a theory that to become "good" at something, anything at all, it takes 2 years of dedicated practice. Pretty vague, but it sounds like a good attitude.
Either way I hope he didn't consume his paycheck for the Nike logotype in Vegas the next day.
I once knew an art student with a focus on fonts and she would spend around 2 weeks designing a T-shirt, she'd make a few dozen variations on her computer and then narrow down on the most appealing design.
I didn't know that bees use 1.618, I will look that up later.
I can highly recommend the youtube channel "numberphile", I loved his explanation of the use of the word billion and his promotion of the words "milliard" and "billiard".
If you like numbers I have a good one, the number 26. This number is situated directly between a square and a cube.
5x5 = 25
3x3x3 = 27
Try to find another number directly adjacent to a square and a cube.
If you can't find any, try to prove that none exist, now that is the hard part and it's little riddles like these which can lead to the escapism of some numberphiles / mathematicians.
According to Bjork, the singer, she says musicians quite often like mathematics. Physicists like drama, good dancers often have a large vocabulary and chess players, well they can very easily learn new games like Shogi, Igo, checkers or Texas Hold'em.
I seem to recall Michael Jordan became a baseball player and then a golf player.
There's a theory that to become "good" at something, anything at all, it takes 2 years of dedicated practice. Pretty vague, but it sounds like a good attitude.
The three three node is in my mind. I think you only need three colours to make a drawing where no two colours touch . It was 1970 I did that so might be wrong. The bridges of Vienna problem was a name for it or is that Wien bridge in circuits? Paris is the correct one?
My three three node was a circle with internal line then a T section with the tail going to infinity. That is a neat idea for rejecting infinity as it is supposed not possible to have a 3 , 3 node. I think that is a good proof? The proof is we have no idea if infinity exists. Certain it hasn't existed yet. That means it never will ? Intuitively it does exist, or is that a wish? Alpha and Omega hints that it always was a question in our minds. That 0 and infinity " are " a loop?
I will try squares and cubes. I found no easy proof of power 4 in anything .This must mean it is a useful abstract. That would include time and that seems a good proof of Quantum theory. To quote Feynman for it to be true a " anything ( my words) " needs to be simultaneously everywhere at one and the same time? That seems to be correct. I never heard him say it I must add. He seems as good as anyone to blame. Descartes was the best in this. He couldn't cope without defining himself mathematically. A problem of confidence in his mind. Animals = autonomita thus Rene is autonomita ? He said no because he had the power of thought. That also suggest the same for animals Rene. Trees therefore don't exist ? Planets also? Or.....? One has to question the logic however profound. I don't . Matter and antimatter are not simultaneously everywhere and that is how we exist.
Hi fi is far more difficult than maths ? It is like being required to be Leonardo to have a voice.
My three three node was a circle with internal line then a T section with the tail going to infinity. That is a neat idea for rejecting infinity as it is supposed not possible to have a 3 , 3 node. I think that is a good proof? The proof is we have no idea if infinity exists. Certain it hasn't existed yet. That means it never will ? Intuitively it does exist, or is that a wish? Alpha and Omega hints that it always was a question in our minds. That 0 and infinity " are " a loop?
I will try squares and cubes. I found no easy proof of power 4 in anything .This must mean it is a useful abstract. That would include time and that seems a good proof of Quantum theory. To quote Feynman for it to be true a " anything ( my words) " needs to be simultaneously everywhere at one and the same time? That seems to be correct. I never heard him say it I must add. He seems as good as anyone to blame. Descartes was the best in this. He couldn't cope without defining himself mathematically. A problem of confidence in his mind. Animals = autonomita thus Rene is autonomita ? He said no because he had the power of thought. That also suggest the same for animals Rene. Trees therefore don't exist ? Planets also? Or.....? One has to question the logic however profound. I don't . Matter and antimatter are not simultaneously everywhere and that is how we exist.
Hi fi is far more difficult than maths ? It is like being required to be Leonardo to have a voice.
i x i = -1
i x i x i = - i
i x i x i x i = 1
Thus with " imagination " a fourth dimension exists. This also seems to prove matter anti matter hypothesis. The fact ( ? ) that the imbalance exists is interesting. A willfulness in the Universe which will puzzle us forever , whatever that/it might be. Forever is now possible. DNA repair is the first step. We need 1000 000 000 years to do the rest. Our forever it not the same as infinity nor is that a problem. I point that out as real infinity ( joke ) and our infinity are different.
Thus imaginary numbers are easy to use. Far easier than bunch numbers ( Calculus ). Fourier was so self critical and that makes his method usable. He defined the oscilloscope without ever seeing one. He said about DC problems. He died as railways came alive. DC, it's a real problem as it can not easily exist. I guess an atom comes close if group 8. Does resonance start from rest for example ?
I heard that 7% of facts are changed every year? Must be nonsense?
i x i x i = - i
i x i x i x i = 1
Thus with " imagination " a fourth dimension exists. This also seems to prove matter anti matter hypothesis. The fact ( ? ) that the imbalance exists is interesting. A willfulness in the Universe which will puzzle us forever , whatever that/it might be. Forever is now possible. DNA repair is the first step. We need 1000 000 000 years to do the rest. Our forever it not the same as infinity nor is that a problem. I point that out as real infinity ( joke ) and our infinity are different.
Thus imaginary numbers are easy to use. Far easier than bunch numbers ( Calculus ). Fourier was so self critical and that makes his method usable. He defined the oscilloscope without ever seeing one. He said about DC problems. He died as railways came alive. DC, it's a real problem as it can not easily exist. I guess an atom comes close if group 8. Does resonance start from rest for example ?
I heard that 7% of facts are changed every year? Must be nonsense?
Yep , fantastic recording , setup correctly you not only get the 3D effect you talk of , but also correct height , Harry is standing on stage above the musicians ..
Both LP's are fantastic, i can count at least 45-60 Lp's at this level of presentation ...
Last edited:
I am so glad Joachim has joined us. That recording is one my table by pure coincidence. Bought it in Baltimore for $1 and is an early copy. It was in the reject bin!
Joachim tells us about Martin Hawksford if you have time?
http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.211.4226&rep=rep1&type=pdf
Joachim tells us about Martin Hawksford if you have time?
http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.211.4226&rep=rep1&type=pdf
Not sure if it's a hypothesis.
Antimatter experiment produces first beam of antihydrogen | CERN
CERN said:
Depends what a fact is.
Did they really cost less than 1 cent?
Was this experiment to prove to yourself that capacitors sound different?
The hypothesis is the 80% missing anti matter. Sure that's a mistake. When someone asked me I said it's hiding at infinity. I argued if so it explains the expanding Universe if that is true. The anti matter is pulling. Just a silly idea.
Fred Hoyle joked about big bang. Next week almost it was fact.
Fred Hoyle joked about big bang. Next week almost it was fact.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.