Your mistake in logic is you assuming the kids will have opportunity to an education that might teach why that name might be considered damned. However it is entirely possible that will never happen, as evident by the parents.
If an unwise choice when naming a child were legally actionable the state would have custody of hundreds of thousands on this basis. I would hope the reason was actually that the home was an unsafe environment for the children for other reasons. The article hints at this but, as usual today's media rarely puts effort into unraveling the truth of a story...go for the attention grabbing headline and move on before any thinking is required.
Yes, they should have gone with a more appropriate name like 'Tiger Lilly' or 'Prince Michael'.
they most certainly would.
except for that n-word.
all things nazi went up in smoke in the us
in December 1941.
now if they had labeled themselves,
'financially persecuted conservatives ...'
and now they are wealthy, and, famous -
An externally hosted image should be here but it was not working when we last tested it.
J/K
Last edited:
With freedom comes self-imposed responsibility. Sometimes inconvenient, often annoying, but that's the price you pay for "your" freedom of speech and expression.
"Few men desire liberty; most men wish only for a just master."
"Every bad precedent originated as a justifiable measure."
Gaius Sallustius Crispus, ca. 86 BC – 35 BC
(generally known simply as Sallust)
"Few men desire liberty; most men wish only for a just master."
"Every bad precedent originated as a justifiable measure."
Gaius Sallustius Crispus, ca. 86 BC – 35 BC
(generally known simply as Sallust)
What, and the naming itself isn't tantamount to abuse? How would you like to grow up with a burden like that?
At least one of the Scandinavian countries have a list of approved names. If the name isn't on the list you can't use it.
An approved list is a bit rich for my blood, but I still feel that there are far too many people just making up names. It's a dead giveaway. What my mother would have called LCV. No class. You don't get the aristocracy calling their kids Doohickey, or even (sorry Frank) Dweezle.
Perhaps you don't consider the realities a kid named Adolph Hitler would face in
1)School
2)Career
3)The DMV (dept. of motor vehicles, since you're not USA based)
Setting your kid up to be a pariah (and a target of violence), that way, means you're an unfit parent. Seems easy enough to me.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.