There absolutely is when you make claims such as "Experienced audiophiles do now how to eliminate all the variables that aren't the actual and genuine audible experience."
Or when you attempt to pass off your subjective experience as something more than simply your subjective experience.
se
SY,
Historically ringing on clipping went unnoticed for several years! there still are amplifiers made that do that! So yes with hindsight we should not make that mistake, we have so many new ones left!
ES
Steve,
The brass seems like a good idea, but the thieves would mistake it for gold and then get upset when they found out otherwise and take it out on me!
It would be a compete waste of time given how you just make stuff up as you do here.
se
The brass seems like a good idea, but the thieves would mistake it for gold and then get upset when they found out otherwise and take it out on me!
Yes, vanity does have its price. But just think how GREAT you'll feel about yourself BEFORE they come back and open up a can of Whoop *** on you.
Edit: Aw man, I thought they'd eased up on the silly-*** nanny filter.
se
This is as far from factual scientific knowledge as it can be.
This is a pure speculation on your part, probably cased on your beliefs.
Maybe the fact that you've been stating it time and again, several years on end, and to what end ?
Without the data, the 'audiophile' hardware, nor the expertise to back it up.
Factual observations + circumstantial evidence = rational assumption, till proven otherwise.
(forgive me father, i myself have commited arrogance display again)
Another demonstration of a declaration based on factual scientific knowledge (to your view).
And you're just spewing a bunch of gibberish. I've better things to do with my time.
se
Yes, vanity does have its price. But just think how GREAT you'll feel about yourself BEFORE they come back and open up a can of Whoop *** on you.
se
Steve
I think I will stick with my tin ears, that way I won't have to get into silly debates over what one can hear versus what can be measured.
I'll stick to the debates on if what you are measuring has any influence on what can actually be heard.
ES
I hear what I hear for my own use only.
I neither manufacture nor sell audio gear.
The point is that some people here say that what I hear isn't real.
You are welcome to have your own views "till proven otherwise". I'm not here to convince anyone with anything. I'm only amused when people tell me that what I hear isn't real.
It would be if it would be written differently.
You take 2 separate statements, each refers to a different person, in different context.
I never said that my listening experience is a factual scientific knowledge. I only said that those who say that what I hear isn't real, that what I hear stems from ego and arrogance, say so without a factual scientific knowledge.
So the contradiction is in your head only.
It takes a lot of vanity and arrogance to make statements about others without knowing the facts.
Hi,
I happen to casually know said reviewer (also his SO), he is quite a hoot, you should meet him one day and have a good natured laugh at his stories of the former Californian Governor.
He reviewed one of my designs and I can attests that he used similarly flowery language to describe it's sound and that no payments of direct bribes, no free products, no taking out Adds in Stereophile or such was involved, he even declined the invitation for lunch when we where over.
He does get paid for writing, by the word I believe.
Ciao T
PS, as you have the schematic, I'd appreciate a copy for study, interested if they use the same feedback scheme as in the B1000
I happen to casually know said reviewer (also his SO), he is quite a hoot, you should meet him one day and have a good natured laugh at his stories of the former Californian Governor.
He reviewed one of my designs and I can attests that he used similarly flowery language to describe it's sound and that no payments of direct bribes, no free products, no taking out Adds in Stereophile or such was involved, he even declined the invitation for lunch when we where over.
He does get paid for writing, by the word I believe.
Ciao T
PS, as you have the schematic, I'd appreciate a copy for study, interested if they use the same feedback scheme as in the B1000
Last edited:
- Status
- Not open for further replies.