Stuart has mentioned time and again he's not participating on this thread as a moderator.
As a non-moderator, he's entitled to the exact same rights as any other member. Which includes e.g. referring to others as The Fly.
(on the other hand, had I been a mod, I would slam his A in the Sin Bin each time he makes a Jewish pasquinade)
As a non-moderator, he's entitled to the exact same rights as any other member. Which includes e.g. referring to others as The Fly.
(on the other hand, had I been a mod, I would slam his A in the Sin Bin each time he makes a Jewish pasquinade)
I just had to do a search.......
Magnetic Innovations LLC looks a bit dodgy and a very similar name to a Netherland magnetics company..... The Netherlands companies patents look plausible, the LLC ones!
I just had to do a search.......
Magnetic Innovations LLC
Look's like a front for patent trolls to me. Though they are the first to bridge medical electronics and audio.
Last edited:
It is a question of ethic.
We don't allow neither our politicians to cheat with taxes, even if they are not involved in the taxes administration, they too have to be exemplary. (At least in my country)
Even in their private life (remember Dominique Strauss-Kahn ;-)
Again, SY, again, what "Extraordinary claims" were-you talking of ?
Last edited:
With 'scientist' I meant 'thinking logical and straightforward based on facts'. I see people here turning around in circles for years without making progress, not learning anything despite all the knowledge and experience that is free here, because they lost the ability and curiosity to really study things, and instead rely on 'it feels good'. I make progress by studying things others have thought about and studied. You know, standing on the shoulders of giants.
Do you realize how nonsensical that statement is?
You confuse respect with 'believing without critical thinking'. I have a lot of respect for Richard and for his accomplishments. But if he (or you) says things that make no sense, I say so. I hope I would get respect for that.
Jan
Funny you would say that, as you are about the only person here continuing personal attacks rather than talking about audio.
Calling someone The Fly is a personal attack. Not having the guts to say who you mean is cowardly. Not things that generally bring a lot of respect.
Jan
Last edited:
I was permanently harassed by this guy (you know who and how) since my arrival on the forum in a very respectfulness and aggressive way. At each and every of my posts.
No cowardliness, just private allusion, because the forum is public, posts stay on Google and i don't want, on my side, to act the same way, by throwing discredit on a pseudo.
End about this subject for me.
Excuses, excuses. Nobody forces you to respond to anything. And I don't know who and how. You could complain to the mods. You were doing a cowardly personal attack. Deal with it.
And yes, I now attack you personally - save you the response.
Jan
You are right, it is clearly posted on my wall:
"Using bad engineering to justify subjective crapola is a capital sin".
Ok, if my "Extraordinary claims" was what i said about feedback impedance influence on the closed loop bandwidth, a quick'n dirty simulation on a VFA .
If you agree that 1175/(1175+25000) = 47/(47+1000), you will agree the feedback ratio is the same. And as everything else is unchanged, open loop bandwidth unchanged.
I just edited the two simulations with a picture editor to make-it in a single image easier to read.
Is this not enough for this kindergarten ?
Oh,yes, it is not in your books.
If you agree that 1175/(1175+25000) = 47/(47+1000), you will agree the feedback ratio is the same. And as everything else is unchanged, open loop bandwidth unchanged.
I just edited the two simulations with a picture editor to make-it in a single image easier to read.
Is this not enough for this kindergarten ?
Oh,yes, it is not in your books.
Attachments
Last edited:
- Status
- Not open for further replies.