|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: dry ol Melbourne Australia
|
My aim is to mimimise or cancel driver non-linearities. I've been searching on this, and understand that
push-push is more effective than push-pull. Thanks to Dave's good drawing at www.t-linespeakers.org/FALL/push-push.html, push-push construction is clear. Box modelling is as per a single woofer, apart from effective Vas doubling. Cone excusion halves. with the 'normal': - connected in parallel: impedance halves, sensitivity + 3 dB - connected in series: impedance doubles, sensitivity - 3 dB Am I right that the wiring is simply normal stereo electrical in-phase? Thanks |
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
frugal-phile(tm)
diyAudio Moderator
|
Quote:
Referring to the attached diagram, normal push-pull is arranged as in #4. Push-push is an arrangement where the drivers are oriented such that the newtonian motion of 1 driver is actively cancelled by another. The most effective way to achieve this is when the magnets are rigidly coupled as in #2. #3 is an arrangement of push-pull that, if you couple the 2 drivers together mechanically with ready rod bolts or carefully placed braces, gets you most of the push-push advantage of #2. (one could mount the drivers such that they fire into a holey PVC pipe the same diameter as the driver) #4 is the ultimate push-push push-pull. it also gives you a box that is 1/4 the size of 2, 3 & 4 (which all have the same box volume despite what you might gather from the cross-section). It also gives added isolation from waves coming back thru the cone. In each case the drivers are wired so they all push on the boxes internal volume the same way. 2 drivers can be treated as a single driver with 2x the Vas (and 2x the Sd). When wired in parallel, efficiency is increased by 3 dB and -- if driver by a true voltage source -- sensitivity goes up 6 dB (3 dB increase in efficiency + 3 dB due to the amp delivering 2x the power) When wired in series, efficiency is increased by 3 dB and -- if driver by a true voltage source -- sensitivity stays the same (3 dB increase in efficiency - 3 dB due to the amp delivering half the power) Sensitivity is a specification i'd like to see binned -- there are lots of amplifiers (tube amps of almost any ilk for instance) that do not satisfy the criteria of being a true voltage source. dave
__________________
community sites t-linespeakers.org, frugal-horn.com ........ commercial site planet10-HiFi p10-hifi forum here at diyA |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: dry ol Melbourne Australia
|
dave
(I'd moved to an option that might not have been the better one for the situation) Which do you think is a more useful to cancel, non-linearity or the newtonian motion? If the drivers aren't that good (current situation - some that i got for $20 each at a car boot sale, for a PC's sub) - probably better to cancel non-linearity, via push- pull? While if the drivers are good, eg Peerless CSX (I also have), better to cancel the newtonian motion (push-push)? And when you have 4 drivers (i have a set of 4 from a cancelled plan): #4 (push-push push-pull) - what is the effective Vas and effects on dB & ohms? Cheers |
|
|
|
|
#4 | |||
|
frugal-phile(tm)
diyAudio Moderator
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
dave
__________________
community sites t-linespeakers.org, frugal-horn.com ........ commercial site planet10-HiFi p10-hifi forum here at diyA |
|||
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: dry ol Melbourne Australia
|
Thanks Dave,
when I read of this some time ago with the with hand built bass drivers and the bolt thru the pole piece http://www.t-linespeakers.org/FALL/push-push.html I was thrown off the benefits, but now the applications are clear Cheers |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Phase inverting one half of a push-pull parrallel channel before recombining? | Test Electrix | Power Supplies | 3 | 23rd March 2009 07:04 PM |
| help tuning push-push ApexJr super 8 woofer | planet10 | Subwoofers | 22 | 28th September 2005 04:00 AM |
| Photos - My first T-Line Push-Push Subwoofer :) | Xmax BR | Subwoofers | 6 | 23rd June 2005 08:17 PM |
| Questions on push-push subs... | Schaef | Subwoofers | 39 | 20th November 2004 02:46 AM |
| damaged cone usage (push push?) | kneadle | Multi-Way | 24 | 27th January 2003 04:51 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.10227 seconds (79.59% PHP - 20.41% MySQL) with 11 queries |