|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Melbourne, Australia
|
I'm working on a Subwoofer using the Peerless 830500 XLS 12" speaker
and 830549 Passive Radiator, but I have a question. Whenever a Subwoofer schematic is shown, it usually looks like this, with the speaker and passive radiator on the same side of the enclosure. What I'd like to know is if there are any valid reasons to avoid the configuration shown below, (my preferred option) with the speaker and passive radiator in line with each-other at opposite ends of the enclosure? The Subwoofer project is based on the Peerless application note found on their website. It requires a 35 litre enclosure. http://www.tymphany.com/papers/appxls12b.htm Thanks in advance, Glenn |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Sweet lake city
|
You have to take care of the out of phase of the radiator with respect to the woofer (which it always is, you just want to limit it somewhat).
Your configuration might even have an advantage with that respect. placement could be an issue here if it is close to a wall lower selection of cut-off frequency will create less problems here in general. I've used an XLS10 downfiring with a radiator on the front with great success. The sub is used as coffeetable and free from walls for more than 1 meter. The crossover was kept below 50-60Hz. I don't know whether it would be as succesfull if the crossover is significantly raised
__________________
better be indoubt untill you're sure |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Stockholm
|
It works fine, it is only the practial aspects with placement in the room that might be a problem.
Take care to make the box heavy enough, here is a clip of an XLS10 system of 14 litres (!) in a too light box. It wanders... Wanderful sub |
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Melbourne, Australia
|
Quote:
Glenn |
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| peerless xxls sealed -vs- peerless xls with passive radiator | Naudio | Subwoofers | 8 | 23rd March 2008 09:00 PM |
| Peerless passive radiator models | sploo | Subwoofers | 9 | 11th August 2007 08:42 AM |
| Does the Peerless XLS 12 NEED a passive radiator? | The Paulinator | Subwoofers | 27 | 6th October 2005 01:34 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.08664 seconds (72.40% PHP - 27.60% MySQL) with 10 queries |