
Home  Forums  Rules  Articles  The diyAudio Store  Gallery  Blogs  Register  Donations  FAQ  Calendar  Search  Today's Posts  Mark Forums Read  Search 

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving 

Thread Tools  Search this Thread 
8th January 2003, 12:47 PM  #1 
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Sweden

XLSSubwoofer question: Two passive radiators instead of one
Hello everybody.
I’m about to modify my Peerless XLS 10” sub. Today, my box is 27 litres and I use the driver together with one 385 gram passive radiator (265 gram plus 120 gram added). I’ve not simulated this box myself and don’t know the tuning frequency. Now I’m going to build a new box with the same tuning frequency but two passive radiators (265 gram plus something). The new box will be slightly larger to compensate for the new radiator volume but how much mass should I add to the two radiators? Is there someone with simulation software that wants to help me with a simulation? Thanks /Daniel 
8th January 2003, 05:06 PM  #2 
Wizard of Kelts
diyAudio Moderator

The formula for a cone volume that is 11 inches around and 4 inches high is 126 cu inchesabout two liters. throw in the volume of the basket rungs and you have 2.5 liters.
So you only have to increase your box volume 2.5 litersless than 10% of a 1 cu ft box. Do me a favorwhat are the outside dimensions of your box and what thickness of materials did you build it with? Also, if you have the dimensions of your sub amp that have attached, please give them also. If you don't have the sub amp dimensions, just tell me the approximate powerthey are likely to be equal to other sub amps in size. I would like to simulate the box as it is now, so I can simulate a box that gives the same response. PS: If you just want to cut an additional hole in the box you have now to mount the second passive radiator, that additional passive rasiator will not throw things off by much. A less than 10% difference in box volume will raise your 3 dB down point by maybe 1 or 2 Hzessentially unhearable. 
8th January 2003, 10:15 PM  #3  
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Borås, Sweden, Tellus

Hi
Quote:
I have tried running a sim with 27 liter net volume, with one and two PR's, and I dont really see a big advantage running with two PR's, but theory is theory. I would say that having two PR's on opposite sides will stopp your sub from "rocking". and thats good! when running with one PR I would try adding 80100gr in your current sub and get some 24 hz lower almost for free. in the sim with two PR's I get quite high weight for the same tuning (21,5 Hz) 730 grams! I dont know if thats to much for the slave. The numbers above are calculated with Unibox and asuming 27 liters NET volume. And be sure to get a second oppinion! and why not your own, download Unibox.XLS , and play around with it. Get it here: http://www.danbbs.dk/~ko/ubmodel.htm
__________________
"What is done by what is called myself is, I feel, done by something greater than myself in me." James Clerk Maxwell. 1879 

9th January 2003, 10:59 AM  #4 
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Sweden

Thank you for your replies.
A little more detailed description of my problem seems to be necessary: When running the sub at high SPL’s I get very large excursion in my PR, that’s why I would like to use two of them. Kelticwizard: The net volume of my present box is 27 litres. And it will still be in my new one. My problem is how to tune the two radiators. I imagine they should be heavier then today’s 385 gram. What I’m thinking about is the analogy to a ported box, if you have a box with a specified port and you want to use two, to lower the speed, you have to make them longer. Shouldn’t my radiators be heavier? You asked about my box and amp. The box has outer dimensions of 366x366x366 mm, the material is 5 mm steel and 18 mm pinewood, internally the box is braced with ø8 mm steel rods. The amp is a Hypex HS 200, which is placed outside the box. Keld: I have downloaded the software (Thanks) and simulating my driver and one 385 gram PR in net volume of 27 litres makes very large excursion under 30 Hz. Mechanical Xmax is +/ 22 mm for the PR so problems do occur approaching 25 Hz, so my apprehension seemed to be correct, maybe. Simulating with “Minimal leaks” and “Minimal fill” (I guess the rods will slower down the air in the box a little bit) I get an Fb of 23.68 Hz. When trying 2 PR’s and aiming for this 23.68 Hz the weight of the PR’s is exactly doubled 770 gram each. Can’t really be a coincidence, doubled “piston area” doubled mass? Or? In the plot one can compare the excursions for the single PR and the double PR designs. The SPL and the excursion for the driver remains the same. /Daniel 
12th January 2003, 12:55 PM  #5 
diyAudio Member

Danne, not sure if this is any help, but I remember that the Danish magazine "High Fidelity" had an article last year (issue 3/2002 p. 51) about designing a DualPR subwoofer. The designer used the 12" XLS drivers but the article might be some help anyway. Maybe the local library can get the magazine for you.
/U. 
12th January 2003, 02:36 PM  #6 
diyAudio Member

Hi danne,
A few people in France have worked on building the ultimate subwoofer with SWR269 10'' XLS Peerless Driver. We started first by building a 1+1 subwoofer, then (and few did) a 2+1 subwoofer. I made a lot of simulations and published curve on our DIY french forum (www.homecinemafr.com), as others did. I never listened to a 1+2 version but simulations show that :  power handling is (of course) incresead  excursion is reduced  400 gr mass on each passive unit is needed  F3 is higher than 1+1 version  volume needeed to achieve F3 around 30 Hz (let's say 29/31 Hz) is around 35 useful liters.  a real strong amplifier is needed (your hypex should fit) Now, if you experience dangerous excursion (peek to peek is 25 mm with the SWR269, so it really shakes), it might be dued to :  a bad location of your subwoofer  an innapropriated bassboost (it SHOULD be defeated with this kind of sub) Considering your volume and additionnal mass to the passive unit, the Fc shoud be around 20 Hz. I personnaly use 25 liters with 1 active and a 400 gr passive unit and  in simulation  I get F3 at 22 Hz. Note that there is no way to get such a low Fc with 2 passive units in a reasonnable volume... 
Thread Tools  Search this Thread 


Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
DIY Passive Radiators  Collo  Subwoofers  22  15th June 2006 11:08 PM 
Passive Radiators?  Kensai  Full Range  3  8th May 2006 10:37 PM 
Passive Radiators (where at buy/how to build)  Puggie  MultiWay  1  10th November 2004 04:22 PM 
Questions re. passive radiators  Dave Jones  MultiWay  8  3rd May 2004 07:47 PM 
Passive Radiators  surf,sun&sound  MultiWay  6  19th November 2001 11:39 AM 
New To Site?  Need Help? 