|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
cross posted in loudspeakers ...
WARNING ....not an electronics expert.. not even an electronics amateur... but I just built an electronic subwoofer crossover from a kit, I simply soldered and prayed a lot It has a volume gain pot but it has no cut-off frequency pot, it has a DPDT that switches from 50 or 70 hz. Is the default 50 or 70 hz setting based on the values of the resistors and capacitors ? Does the two IC thats built into the kit play a role in the cut-off frequency. My goal is to change these to 30 and 40 hz, as I can still localize the position of the sub on the 50 hz setting.
__________________
na |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Chatham, England
|
The actual filter is the section in the middle, it's a new topology on me, but at a quick glance it looks like it is only a first order crossover as I can only see one pole. Of course, I reserve the right to be completely wrong.
This means you only have a 6dB slope, so no wonder you can still localise the sub. Changing caps or resistors won't help much I'm afraid, you need a much steeper slope. Where did that kit come from? Do you have any references?
__________________
Al I conceive of nothing, in religion, science or philosophy, that is more than the proper thing to wear, for a while. Charles Fort |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
its from a local electronics store.. unfortunately, its the only one available...how about daisy chaining two of these ?
__________________
na |
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Menlo Park, CA
|
Quote:
IC2D is a second order Sallen Key low-pass filter with unity gain. With SW open, F0 = 50Hz and Q0 = .73 With SW closed, F0 = 70Hz and Q0 = .69 A third pole is added at 153 Hz before IC2C. IC2C is a unity gain non-inverting buffer. You should have a resistor (try 196 Ohms) in series with its output to limit short-circuit current and avoid oscillation problems driving capacitive loads. With calibrated output level (Measure with an SPL metter. Try pink noise a couple octaves wide in the sub's pass band and main speakers') no port noise, no rattles, and low distortion the sub should not be localizable. Integration with the main speakers may be a problem. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sallen_Key_filter http://www.linkwitzlab.com/filters.htm#2 |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Hi Drew, thanks for the inputs.. to summarize
1. Replace the 500 and 510 K resistors with a 15K part 2. add a 196K ohm resistor in series with the ic2s output' , that would be before the 2.2K ohm resistor right ? the new circuit would look like this right ? ![]() After doing all these what would the effect on the sub be ? did I just lower the crossover point ? thanks]
__________________
na |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
|
The changes Drew suggested only change the gain to unity ,the crossover points won't change.The resistor he mentioned is actually 196ohms not 196K ohms and it should be at the output of IC2C pin14 not before the 2k2 resistor.The crossover actually has an 18db per octave slope.If you want to lower the crossover frequency you can do this by changing 3 resistors with larger values ,or by increasing the value of the .47uf and .22uf caps either by replacing them or paralleling new ones with them.
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
__________________
na |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
|
Unity gain means that the signal into the unit will not be boosted by the circuit at all.With the original resistors(500k,510k) it would boost the signal 16.8 db which is way too much for a sub crossover.
If you were to double the value of either the resistors or the caps in the filter section you would lower the crossover to exactly half the frequency.For instance doubling the two .47uf's and the .22uf you would then have a crossover point at 25hz (instead of 50hz) and 35hz( instead of 70hz.) |
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
THANKS !!!
__________________
na |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
|
Your welcome
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Help with modification of QLN crossover | Cyberkul | Multi-Way | 2 | 3rd October 2008 08:46 PM |
| Rane Crossover Modification | kbasaran | Parts | 7 | 18th September 2008 02:01 PM |
| crossover L-pad modification | Theli | Multi-Way | 7 | 26th January 2007 05:31 PM |
| electronic crossover modification | qguy | Multi-Way | 5 | 4th January 2007 11:54 PM |
| Crossover Modification | Jim McPherson | Multi-Way | 1 | 1st October 2005 05:05 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.13986 seconds (81.84% PHP - 18.16% MySQL) with 11 queries |