|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
|
I am looking at a subwoofer design using two 12" Titanic MKIII drivers (wired in series) and the Dayton 1000W amplifier. The objective is to get the best performance (good sound quality and high SPL) possible form a small enclosure. I can place these drivers in a 1.7cf enclosure with a Q of about 1 and f3 of about 37. This subwoofer will be used in a room 19ft by 14ft with 9ft ceiling. One of the 19ft walls is only half enclosed with the other half opening to the rest of the house. The subwoofer will be located near a wall, most likely near a corner.
I have considered using a Linkwitz transform circuit to achieve a lower f3. I wonder if I really need to do this (and put the drivers though the added abuse), or if the driver will provide good response down to 20Hz with room loading. I have also been encouraged to explore vented designs. My compact enclosure requirement seems to make this approach less practical. I also have concerns with the group delay of the vented design at low frequencies. I have been encouraged to explore the RS drivers. The excursion limits keep driving me back to the Titanic drivers. Getting to the point, I am wondering if I need to be concerned about the 37Hz f3. Most commercial subwoofers publish specs closer to 20Hz. It is questionable in most cases if these specs are anechoic or room loaded. It is also questionable how they achieve low frequency extension. What type of musical and HT performance should I expect from the proposed design? |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
A linkwitz transform just might be your friend in this situation... A Q of 1 is pretty high by most standards as far as I'm aware, so lowering that down to .7 or so electronically may yeild desireable reults...
I would aim for a F3 of 30hz myself using a sealed box
__________________
The golden rule of DIY: Build nice, or build twice! |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| OB in room response | valleyman | Full Range | 11 | 6th August 2008 07:16 PM |
| desired in room response-what do you go after? | terry j | Multi-Way | 13 | 18th September 2007 07:09 AM |
| Room response | gfinlayson | Multi-Way | 11 | 15th May 2006 10:18 PM |
| In room response? | 2litre | Subwoofers | 5 | 16th January 2006 09:26 PM |
| MTM - How to measure in room response? | Spearmint | Multi-Way | 9 | 13th November 2004 08:09 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.07201 seconds (72.53% PHP - 27.47% MySQL) with 10 queries |