|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Hi,
That's the first time that I try to build a subwoofer. I'm in bassbox trying to modeling the perfect response curve with a low f3 and... since too much time lol. So I realized a vented and a sealed simulation. You can find the driver specification here. Here's the sealed bos specifications: Box Properties Name: Type: Closed Box Shape: Prism, square Vb = 2.1 cu.ft Qtc = 0.694 QL = 7 F3 = 35.01 Hz Fill = normal I think that the F3 is way too high, am I right? I used the suggested Vb by the tcsounds website Here's the vented box specifications: Box Properties Name: Type: Vented Box Shape: Prism, square Vb = 3 cu.ft Fb = 20.42 Hz QL = 6.928 F3 = 26.77 Hz Fill = normal No. of Vents = 1 Vent shape = round Vent ends = one flush Dv = 3 in Lv = 12.26 in I know, I know... 3 cu.ft is small for vented enclosures... But I don't have the choice, I don't have a lot of space... Now here's the normalized amplitude response graphs... (Sealed=red, ported=turquoise) So, what do you think about that? Thank you, David Lafleur |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: USA, MN
|
Actually, a Sealed box with an F3 of 35Hz will sound very solid.
That woofer will not work ported unless you use a VERY large diameter port. If you use anything less than a 6" diameter flared port you will have mucho whistling and chuffing noises if you apply any power at all. Alternatively you could use several Passive Radiators instead of a port. Note that the Mfg. recommended enclosures are showing response with an external highpass filter which applies bass boost. This is a bit of a cheat for marketing purposes, IMO. I'd go sealed, especially if this is for a car.
__________________
Our species needs, and deserves, a citizenry with minds wide awake and a basic understanding of how the world works. --Carl Sagan Science is a way of thinking much more than it is a body of knowledge. --Carl Sagan |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Hey Ron E,
Ok thank you so much, for the tip. But, actually, this is for my home. But, for the home, an f3 of 35Hz is still very solid? And on the website recommended enclosures they says: "20Hz Extention Systems (Home Audio, -3dB at ~18Hz)" Thank you for the fast reply. David Lafleur |
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: USA, MN
|
Quote:
TC Sounds has a good reputation so it is curious that the given parameters are inconsistent. Before I designed a box for that woofer, I'd measure the actual parameters. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ I put the following parameters into my calculator: Fs 22.0 Hz Qts 0.373 Qes 0.404 Vas 101.0 Liters Re 4.25 Ohms Dia 20.5 cm and get the calculated parameters of: Sd 0.0330 m^2 Mms 0.0793 kg Cms 0.000660 m/N Bl 10.74 T*m no 88.85 dB/2.83V no 86.10 dB/1W Qms 4.86 Rms 2.25 ------------------------------------------------------------------- If instead I use the given fundamental parameters: Sd 0.0330 m^2 Mms 0.1100 kg Cms 0.00035 m/N One gets the resultant parameters: Fs 25.6 Hz Vas 53.6 liters I haven't calculated Qts, Qes, Qms here. Notice that the given parameters of Fs, Vas and Q give different values of Cms and Mms than quoted, and using the given values for Cms and Mms give different Fs and Vas than quoted.
__________________
Our species needs, and deserves, a citizenry with minds wide awake and a basic understanding of how the world works. --Carl Sagan Science is a way of thinking much more than it is a body of knowledge. --Carl Sagan |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Yeah, I noticed that, but I don't know why they don't give Le too... I would like to know this parameter...
I noticed that the parameters are incoherents... I did 2 "box simulations".... One with coherents parameters and the other one with the tcsounds givenparameters. I don't know which one to use... Thank you for the reply, David Lafleur |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: USA, MN
|
Le is given indirectly
I wouldn't use the given or extrapolated parameters when designing a box. I would measure them. Of course, you won't know whether it is suited to your enclosure size before buying, but that is the problem when manufacturers don't give consistent parameter sets - and often even when they do Good luck.
__________________
Our species needs, and deserves, a citizenry with minds wide awake and a basic understanding of how the world works. --Carl Sagan Science is a way of thinking much more than it is a body of knowledge. --Carl Sagan |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Thank you Ren E for the reply,
I would like to measure them, but Parts-Express don't sell the woofer tester 2 anymore... They will update it and start selling a new one in the mid 2007. So, should I take the tcsounds specifications or the coherent specifications? And, in my "Need URGENT advice! on subwoofer purchase!" thread, BAM said: "Build the TC Sounds recommended 3-cubic-foot vented enclosure, with the single 4"-diameter vent. Use a Precision Port flared port kit from Parts Express. These will give you good results. It takes an incredible amount of motor strength to generate the kind of air movement that the TC-1000 is capable of from an enclosure smaller than 3 cubic feet. But the good news is, a 3-cubic-foot enclosure is more compact than you may think. Build an enclosure with internal dimensions of 14.5"Wx18"Hx20"D. The vent length needed should be able to fit into that space". I'm confused... I don't know what I should do. Thank you, David Lafleur |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Melbourne, Australia
|
You haven't really given us much info for us to advise you. Your room will determine the room gain you will get. In some rooms, there is no room gain at all. In such rooms, for low extension for HT you might go for vented. If you have a room with lots of gain, you might for for a sealed box. This is a bit simplistic, but it's a start.
I recommend you simulate with WinISD pro alpha. The plots you show don't have appropriate filters, hence the response will be much different. Where are you crossing this sub? What are your mains? I've written some articles in the wiki on how to simulate with WinISD, you might like to have a look.
__________________
AUDIO BLOG | Bass integration guide My work: www.redspade.com.au web design studio |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| ported --> vented enclosure? Or just sealed? | dj.eph | Subwoofers | 3 | 20th December 2004 05:23 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.11356 seconds (81.39% PHP - 18.61% MySQL) with 10 queries |