|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: California
|
This if for you gurus out there that have quick and easy access to a 4th order design program. This is for my car, which is a sedan. I already built a sealed box in the trunk for my single 10" JL W6. It sounds good, but is rattleing the crap out of my trunk. My brainy ideal is a 4th order with the port up through the back deck, which means all the sound goes into the cabin. So i have several sections of 11" diameter plastic pipe to use for the two parts of the box. I have a 3-inch port, with flairs at both ends, that is about 14-inchs long, not counting the flairs. The speaker specs:
Qts: 0.497 Fs: 28.5 Vas: 33.4 liters Xmax: 15.2 mm Sd: 51.4 sqin Dia: 25.4 cm Displacement: 1.9 liters I need to know the front and rear box volumes and the port length. I can add the required additional volume when taking into account the port area and the driver displacement. As far as desired parameters, the F3 should be somewhere around, or below 30 hz, with the total box volume as small as possible. Since this is in a car, i think I'm looking for zero Gain from the box design. I did plug this into a calculator I found. the Vf, Vr and Port length were, 0.51 cf, 0.68 cf and 14.7 in with a F3 of 30 hz and a 1.4 db gain. I'm wondering how close this matches the output of a design program. Thanks!! Russ |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Australia
|
Bandpass enclosures for cars don't really have an F3 like vented boxes do, at least not one that helps you design one.
Instead you design for a certain "slope", usually one very close what you would get with the driver in sealed. In your sutiation I came up with a sealed chamber of 0.66cuft, and a vented chamber of 0.8cuft with your flared 3'' vent a mere 2.5'' long (including the flares) I would personally go with a 4'' port (no or mimimal flaring) 4'' long. This is the raw response (in car response will be different), yellow is sealed in .8cuft, light blue is the bandpass, you can see the bandpass response is similar to the sealed (only louder) |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Australia
|
And for contrast the design from the calculator you found in pink.
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
|
i made this box
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Chamblee, Ga.
|
A couple of things, you say W6, but post specs for the W6v2 except list Qes as Qts, so what do you really have? If v2, then the published Qts = 0.469 and ya'll need to revise your sims.
Also, while some other car audio brands offer 4th order BP alignments on some of their 'subs', JL doesn't for the W6 series, so this gives me pause as to it being a viable option for good performance/long term durability. Only one way to know for sure though. GM
__________________
Loud is Beautiful if it's Clean! As always though, the usual disclaimers apply to this post's contents. |
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 1st order Passive Line Level Crossover + 2nd order Highpass? | alexclaber | Multi-Way | 11 | 4th January 2008 07:15 PM |
| deceptive perception ? 1st order-2nd order question | poldus | Multi-Way | 4 | 10th April 2007 11:58 PM |
| My 1st order butterworth filter better than 4th order L-R: Why? | philipreji | Solid State | 61 | 1st March 2007 04:50 PM |
| 2nd Order Tweeter + 3rd Order Woofer = OK? | Jay | Multi-Way | 3 | 12th September 2005 12:12 PM |
| 1st order ? L-R 2nd order? or transient perfect?? | Ken L | Multi-Way | 6 | 17th October 2003 04:22 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |