|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Geosynchronous orbit above Edmonton
|
CMS Calculation from Adire
Hi All, I'm trying to design a subwoofer, and messing around with different drivers being currently offered. From the above link, I rearrange the Cms formula to: Vas = Cms * SdČ * Constants (basically the rest of the formula... I'm more interested in the relation between Vas, Cms, & Sd) I notice that Vas goes up dramatically with increased surface area, and that a lower Cms value would decrease the Vas for a given surface area. So, say I want to move a huge amount of air, but not have a 12 cu ft. enclosure, I could pick whichever driver has a lower Vas, which in turn would mean lower Cms (Sd constant for the two drivers). I'm also looking at this, given everything, I'm probably better off with multiple smaller drivers than one huge driver, if I'm trying to keep a smaller box size... (And yes, I am fixing all other values that can be fixed, and only changing Cms) |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Stockholm
|
If Cms is small, you will need a large cone mass for a given fs. This in turn requires a high Bl in order to keep the efficiency high, ie the driver becomes expensive.
It is interesting to note how small effect the Cms value has on the response of a system. Actually, when the Mms, Bl and Re are kept constant, Cms hardly affects the response at all. In particular, making Cms softer makes almost no change. Below is a simulation of three BR systems I did some while ago. I don't remember the exact variation of Cms, but I think it was at least a factor of 2 between the curves. The bottom line here is that Cms in itself isn't very interesting. On the other hand, Mms and Sd is. |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: USA, MN
|
Low Cms or low Vas, means generally higher Fs or heavy cone and lowish sensitivity (less sound per watt or volt)
__________________
Our species needs, and deserves, a citizenry with minds wide awake and a basic understanding of how the world works. --Carl Sagan Science is a way of thinking much more than it is a body of knowledge. --Carl Sagan |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Geosynchronous orbit above Edmonton
|
Hi,
Thank you for your replys and curves, that is what I was thinking. The effect of Cms isn't that large, in comparision to other factors. It's relationship does tie to other important considerations, and so, if I can get a low Cms driver there is an effect, but not large enough to actually specifically seek a driver with a low Cms. |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| another reason to be proud... | tomtt | The Lounge | 22 | 13th February 2011 09:02 PM |
| A reason NOT to DIY.. | ScottG | Multi-Way | 114 | 8th June 2008 02:20 AM |
| Any reason not to consider this? | BHTX | Multi-Way | 9 | 2nd August 2007 08:21 AM |
| Any other reason for using 4 ohms version of driver other than power ? | thinker10 | Multi-Way | 26 | 6th June 2006 07:52 AM |
| Any reason? | MaXiZ | Solid State | 10 | 11th April 2005 09:06 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.08575 seconds (76.22% PHP - 23.78% MySQL) with 10 queries |