Is there any reason not to pick a driver with a low Cms value?
 User Name Stay logged in? Password
 Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Search

 Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you. Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
 18th October 2006, 07:34 PM #1 diyAudio Member   Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Geosynchronous orbit above Edmonton Is there any reason not to pick a driver with a low Cms value? CMS Calculation from Adire Hi All, I'm trying to design a subwoofer, and messing around with different drivers being currently offered. From the above link, I rearrange the Cms formula to: Vas = Cms * Sd² * Constants (basically the rest of the formula... I'm more interested in the relation between Vas, Cms, & Sd) I notice that Vas goes up dramatically with increased surface area, and that a lower Cms value would decrease the Vas for a given surface area. So, say I want to move a huge amount of air, but not have a 12 cu ft. enclosure, I could pick whichever driver has a lower Vas, which in turn would mean lower Cms (Sd constant for the two drivers). I'm also looking at this, given everything, I'm probably better off with multiple smaller drivers than one huge driver, if I'm trying to keep a smaller box size... (And yes, I am fixing all other values that can be fixed, and only changing Cms)
 18th October 2006, 10:10 PM #2 diyAudio Member     Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Stockholm If Cms is small, you will need a large cone mass for a given fs. This in turn requires a high Bl in order to keep the efficiency high, ie the driver becomes expensive. It is interesting to note how small effect the Cms value has on the response of a system. Actually, when the Mms, Bl and Re are kept constant, Cms hardly affects the response at all. In particular, making Cms softer makes almost no change. Below is a simulation of three BR systems I did some while ago. I don't remember the exact variation of Cms, but I think it was at least a factor of 2 between the curves. The bottom line here is that Cms in itself isn't very interesting. On the other hand, Mms and Sd is. __________________ Simulate loudspeakers: Basta! Simulate the baffle step: The Edge
 19th October 2006, 12:04 AM #3 diyAudio Member     Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: USA, MN Low Cms or low Vas, means generally higher Fs or heavy cone and lowish sensitivity (less sound per watt or volt) __________________ Our species needs, and deserves, a citizenry with minds wide awake and a basic understanding of how the world works. --Carl Sagan Armaments, universal debt, and planned obsolescence--those are the three pillars of Western prosperity. —Aldous Huxley
 19th October 2006, 02:47 PM #4 diyAudio Member   Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Geosynchronous orbit above Edmonton Very interesting curves Hi, Thank you for your replys and curves, that is what I was thinking. The effect of Cms isn't that large, in comparision to other factors. It's relationship does tie to other important considerations, and so, if I can get a low Cms driver there is an effect, but not large enough to actually specifically seek a driver with a low Cms.

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are Off Pingbacks are Off Refbacks are Off Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post tomtt The Lounge 25 16th March 2013 07:21 AM ScottG Multi-Way 117 3rd February 2013 04:30 PM BHTX Multi-Way 9 2nd August 2007 08:21 AM thinker10 Multi-Way 26 6th June 2006 07:52 AM MaXiZ Solid State 10 11th April 2005 09:06 PM

 New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 11:54 AM.