|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Bremerton, WA.
|
Hi all,
Please bear with me on this, this question is jumping into new territory for me. I was wondering about tuning a DVC driver by using the second coil as the tuning coil. How does this work? Let' say I want to raise Qts from .35 to say 1.0. Do I place X valued resister across the second coil to raise the total Qes to the point where the Qes/Qms relationship makes the drivers Qts 1.0? R/ Jim |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Bremerton, WA.
|
Sorry, by searching a bit more I found some more info but still need a bit of a shove down the thought path.
In particular, Dayton SD270-8-8. Specs are only displayed for coils wired in parallel. Qes is .43, Qms 3.20, Qts .38. Would the max Qts I could get be .76? R/ Jim |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: USA, MN
|
When using a single coil, you can modify Qts from the value with parallel coils (with damping coil shorted) to about double that value (with damping coil open).
Search for RDO and/or DVC and you will get plenty of answers. You did uncheck the "Have you searched" question, right?
__________________
Our species needs, and deserves, a citizenry with minds wide awake and a basic understanding of how the world works. --Carl Sagan Science is a way of thinking much more than it is a body of knowledge. --Carl Sagan |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Bremerton, WA.
|
Ron,
Oh yeah, my first post was 'check' and post. Then I searched, hence the second post. So 'about double' Qts is 'about correct' on this. I'll continue reading both RDO and DVC searches... The 92.7 SPL is for both coils in parallel too I bet. So for one coil driven I should expect about 89.7 SPL. Still doable for me as I will be driving a pair of them for an amp load of 4ohms and 92.7 SPL. I've also read that power capacity is reduced by about 1/3 and that's OK too. Thanks, Jim |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Speakerholic
diyAudio Moderator
|
Whatcha buildin' Jim?
I thought we were doing something with the 125's and the RS 225's? You gots more in mind? |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Bremerton, WA.
|
Cal,
You're not suposed to be here!! Was tinkering with Xbaffle and was shocked at the projected response of the RS225's. Just doing the worst thing possible..........thinking. I need to stay at a Holiday Inn for a night. Talk to you soon. R/ Jim |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: USA, MN
|
If you want to "jam" a woofer (make it fit some desired spec or alignment) you can raise Q with added mass or series resistance.
BTW, sensitivity goes down 6dB for the series or single coil connection. For RDO: http://www.adireaudio.com/Files/Tech...OOperation.pdf
__________________
Our species needs, and deserves, a citizenry with minds wide awake and a basic understanding of how the world works. --Carl Sagan Science is a way of thinking much more than it is a body of knowledge. --Carl Sagan |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Monica-3 USB, wiring questions | kvk | Digital Source | 0 | 6th May 2008 04:51 PM |
| first amp build... wiring questions | jdbrocious | Tubes / Valves | 43 | 4th March 2008 03:21 PM |
| Four wiring questions | hotscot | Chip Amps | 13 | 20th January 2007 10:15 PM |
| DI Box wiring questions | bkspero | Instruments and Amps | 10 | 17th November 2006 12:59 AM |
| DVC wiring questions.. | JRace | Subwoofers | 6 | 3rd March 2006 07:40 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.10332 seconds (76.82% PHP - 23.18% MySQL) with 10 queries |