|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
|
Hi Guys/Girls
I am new to this obviously. Some years ago I bought a Shiva Mk1 and built the 88.5 Litre sealed reference design by adire. I was not impressed by the bass so I ported it with a 4" port, length calculated by WinISD. Now all I designed the port length for was max flatness. Measurements have backed up the port length I used by changing it and remeasuring. So this is not a recognised alignment like SBB4. Now it sounds much better than the sealed but is this subwoofer suicide? Should I be rebuilding it to get "so much more" out of the driver. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: MTL
|
i just built a sub with the new Shiva driver in 12"
and a 300W Bash amplifier using a 95liters sealed enclosure... and i have to say WOAAAAA this cheap driver reallly rocks are you sure that you got ur stuff working correctly with the sealed box ? what amplification are you using ? |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: south yorkshire, UK
|
Now it sounds much better than the sealed but is this subwoofer suicide?
that kinda depends... by changing to a ported box you have altered the way the driver is loaded. In a sealed box much of the 'springing' responsible for restraining the cone is provided by the air volume in the box. In a vented or ported box that pretty much vanishes, and the restraint is provided by the physical construction of the driver - the spider, surround, the pole pieces etc. When you whack a dollop of bass through the driver in a sealed box, the cone moves, but nothing like as much as it can move in a vented box. You need to make sure you do not exceed the Xmax parameter ( the quoted maximum linear displacement of the cone). The real issue with a vented box becomes apparent when you get towards the resonant frequency of the box , and worse - the driver. At this point the damping becomes dangerously low and the impedance of the driver goes ballistic. This is where a lot of speaker damage is done as the voicecoil slams against the pole-piece , or the suspension gets ripped out. So , provided you keep power down to a safe point then you will never risk the speaker, but by changing from a sealed box to a vented box you have lowered the power limit safe point. A driver that can take 200Watts in a sealed box may self destruct in 60Watts in a vented one. The up-side is the extra 3dB in gain and the lower roll-off When you look at driver specs, the Xmax and Qts/Qes figures are good for a rough guide as to what type of enclosure you are best using for that particular driver - clearly you woun't get much usable power in a vented box with a driver that specs a Xmax of 1.2mm... Bootnote: Having just looked up the specs for the Shiva , with a quoted Xmax of almost 16mm I would not have too many concerns about using a vented box !! , although I would suggest possibly a bigger enclosure than you currently have , possibly 100 litres or so.One other thing you might consider is driving only one coil , and using a resistive damper on the other to adjust the Qts to suit your needs. |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| WHY???? Midrange magnet's vented pole piece sealed by design - Thiel CS3.5 ???? | dtm1962 | Multi-Way | 1 | 24th July 2008 04:28 PM |
| Making sealed shiva ported | Matt Neilson | Subwoofers | 10 | 13th October 2003 11:25 AM |
| Flared ports and dual vented / sealed design | Dave Bullet | Multi-Way | 3 | 23rd October 2002 12:04 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.07707 seconds (74.22% PHP - 25.78% MySQL) with 10 queries |