WinISD vs. UniBox on port tuning - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Loudspeakers > Subwoofers

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 23rd September 2006, 11:19 PM   #1
dscline is offline dscline  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Default WinISD vs. UniBox on port tuning

I'm putting together a ported sub. This is kind of a quick/dirty project, and the way it's going together, it's wouldn't be easy to fine tune the port once done. But WinISD and Unibox are giving me two different answers as to port length: WinISD says 11.79", and UniBox says 10.72". Everything else is the same, to the extent possible. Not a huge difference, but I'd like to be as accurate as possible. Anyone have any experiences that show one to be any more accurate than the other?
  Reply With Quote
Old 24th September 2006, 12:16 AM   #2
Collo is offline Collo  Australia
diyAudio Member
 
Collo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Newcastle, Australia
Send a message via MSN to Collo
One of the authors of WinISD wrote a paper comparing predicted port lengths given by 10 packages.

Access the paper from this WinISD discussion thread

Whilst it doesn't list Unibox, it does show good agreement between WinISD and most of the packages listed

I've attached a partial screenshot
Attached Images
File Type: gif port length comparo.gif (14.2 KB, 144 views)
__________________
Ports rule!
  Reply With Quote
Old 24th September 2006, 12:56 AM   #3
dscline is offline dscline  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Hmmm. Someone at AVS has been getting lower real world tunings than WinISD predicts, which was starting to make me think UniBox might be right. Of course, it's certainly possible one could be high in one situation, and the other high in another. The difference only correlates to about 1hz, so it's not a huge deal either way... maybe I'll just shoot for something in between.
  Reply With Quote
Old 27th September 2006, 05:39 PM   #4
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Calgary on the Bow
Default quick and dirty?

make th event 11.75 inches long. This is easier to measure with a rule and splits the difference in a dirty way. The difference in your box volume (predicted Vs actual) will be miles bigger in difference that the vent length difference you are looking at. Gets even worse if you decide to flair the vent ends. (good idea to me). Sounds like you are drinking too much cofee. It was your idea to make his quick and dirty I agree. I have seen $3500.00 speakers with vent lengths that were different by almost 3/4 of an inch. Didn't bother the manufacturer much. Sloppy and unforgiveable at that price point. Regards Moray James.
__________________
moray james
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Unibox/WinISD Port Size Discrepancies HTRookie Multi-Way 2 30th September 2007 06:34 PM
issue WinISD port length Qes/Pe! Amit_112dB Subwoofers 4 4th August 2007 06:26 AM
Port length in WinISD? Marsh Subwoofers 10 1st July 2007 07:42 PM
Winisd port configuration toenail Subwoofers 3 30th January 2006 01:23 AM
newbie question.WinISD and port tubes PTM Multi-Way 4 31st January 2005 08:55 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 11:58 PM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2