Go Back   Home > Forums > Loudspeakers > Subwoofers
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11th September 2006, 06:01 PM   #11
diyAudio Member
 
Cro maniac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Zagreb, Croatia
Blog Entries: 2
Send a message via Skype™ to Cro maniac
Cristophorus,

you have low Q driver, so it is optimised for use in small boxes (BR or use with PR). I recommended such a small, low-tuned BR box because it it gives rolloff similar to closed box which best integrates with car cabin gain.

Blue graph gives rolloff of only 3dB/oct, so it will have have strong rising response to lower frequencies when placed in car.No good.
I you'd like to turn some heads when driving by, but still want to attain relatively flat curve, then aim for something in between red and yellow curve.
I don't think that yellow curve would give you boomy bass because you usually shouldn't cross-over your sub higher than 80Hz, because mains can take care of the rest of the spectrum, you will avoid main car cabin resonance and subwoofer localisation problems. 120Hz really isn't something that you should need sub for. I usually like to cross-over my subs between 40-60Hz and leave the rest to the mains (if they are up to the job).
  Reply With Quote
Old 12th September 2006, 03:21 PM   #12
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Hi Noodle_snacks,
Why I add 1 ohm resistor, because it raised overall SPL by 1dB.
If it's not good, I pull out that resistor.

Hi Cro maniac,
to get in between red and yellow curve, I change box dimension to 36 liters.
How about adding mass? When I add 20grams mass, in Transfer function magnitude graph overall curve raised by 2dB! but SPL graph barely changed.
Is it a good idea adding mass to cone?

Thank's
Chris.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12th September 2006, 08:06 PM   #13
diyAudio Member
 
Cro maniac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Zagreb, Croatia
Blog Entries: 2
Send a message via Skype™ to Cro maniac
Series resistor will only ruin the ability of the amp to properly control your sub.
Also, one fifth of the power of your amp that you should be using for sound will be lost in resistor heating. That's 75W of heat for 300W on sub.

All manufacturers of drivers try to get speaker cones lighter, and you try to get them heavier
With heavier cones you lose sensitivity. In your case, it only attenuates higher bass frequencies, so at first sight it may seem that low bass sensitivity is increased (transfer function), but when you look to SPL graph, you see that in <60Hz region nothing has changed. So, forget adding mass to driver.
  Reply With Quote
Old 13th September 2006, 09:23 AM   #14
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Thank's Cro maniac,
so it's better for WinISD creator to delete adding mass and series resistor option, if it makes no good at all.
I think I reach the optimum design for my "not so good" spec. driver and start making wood dust.
I will post here when it done.

see you.
Chris.
  Reply With Quote
Old 13th September 2006, 01:58 PM   #15
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Hobart, Tasmania
Send a message via MSN to noodle_snacks
the series resistance is useful when you are simulating the response of midwoofers in an enclosure that would have one or more inductors in the low pass crossover (inductors have a DC series restiance)
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
6th Order Bandpass Subwoofer (rear & front chamber size?) nickthevoice Subwoofers 12 8th February 2008 11:01 PM
4th order bandpass with PR tade Subwoofers 2 14th November 2005 02:08 PM
Check out this bandpass box screenshot from WinISD Pro. How does it look? treedog Subwoofers 7 23rd January 2005 10:21 PM
6th order bandpass subwoofer Ilianh Subwoofers 50 25th January 2003 02:40 AM
the isobarik 6th order bandpass transmission line folded horn subwoofer idea Yoda Subwoofers 3 24th October 2001 04:00 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 06:23 PM.

Page generated in 0.08014 seconds (76.95% PHP - 23.05% MySQL) with 11 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio