Go Back   Home > Forums > Loudspeakers > Subwoofers
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 5th September 2006, 01:03 PM   #11
diyAudio Member
 
RobWells's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: UK
LOL

google is your friend.
  Reply With Quote
Old 5th September 2006, 02:52 PM   #12
AndrewT is offline AndrewT  Scotland
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
Hi,
downfiring will cause some sag in the suspension.
I have seen the 5% figure quoted elsewhere.

If you can see/measure any sag difference between upfireing and downfiring, you have probably already exceeded the 5% limit on a low Xmax driver.

Stick with side firing except for a driver specially developed for vertical mounting.
__________________
regards Andrew T.
  Reply With Quote
Old 5th September 2006, 06:45 PM   #13
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
I've seen the 5% number too. But I don't know how it is derived.

It seems like it would be different for different drivers.

I have never before heard of drivers specially designed for vertical firing. That sound intriging.

I have also never seen anything in print which analyzes how long the legs need to be, and the effect of the design of being so close to the floor.
  Reply With Quote
Old 6th September 2006, 07:56 AM   #14
Ap is offline Ap
diyAudio Member
 
Ap's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Sydney, Australia
I think if the box is sealed, then sag would be minimal as the driver effectivley is held by the air pressure of the box - does that make sense?
Anyway I quite like the look of SVS subwoofers.
http://www.svsound.com/
  Reply With Quote
Old 6th September 2006, 12:26 PM   #15
AndrewT is offline AndrewT  Scotland
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
Hi,
Quote:
if the box is sealed, then sag would be minimal as the driver effectivley is held by the air pressure of the box
sorry, Rubbish.
__________________
regards Andrew T.
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th September 2006, 12:30 AM   #16
Ap is offline Ap
diyAudio Member
 
Ap's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Sydney, Australia
Why is that rubbish?
The only way the driver can move is if the volume of air in the box increases, this can only happen if it is not properly sealed.
Of course the other way the driver moves is by the force applied to it from a signal applied to the voice coil, in this instance the air inside the box is being compressed - that is why a sealed box is often referred to as working like a spring.
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th September 2006, 12:41 AM   #17
SY is offline SY  United States
diyAudio Moderator
 
SY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Austin, TX
Blog Entries: 1
Quote:
The only way the driver can move is if the volume of air in the box increases, this can only happen if it is not properly sealed.
That's not correct; the volume can (and does) increase with varying energy inputs. In the case of cone-down, the driver gives up an energy 1/2kx2, balanced against the change in energy from expansion of the volume PdV. It's no different than any other mass-on-a-spring: if you exert a force mg, you'll get a response kx.

Now, you can argue that eventually, the box's pressure will equalize (no box is totally impermeable). And that's a correct argument. But it really means that the cone sag increases with time until that equilibration occurs.
__________________
"...we stumble and get up, we are sad, confident, insecure, feel loneliness and joy and love. There is nothing more; but I want nothing more.” - Christopher Hitchens 1949-2011
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th September 2006, 07:43 AM   #18
AndrewT is offline AndrewT  Scotland
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
and what if the air temperature in the box changes?
__________________
regards Andrew T.
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th September 2006, 07:50 AM   #19
Ap is offline Ap
diyAudio Member
 
Ap's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Sydney, Australia
Hey good point - I haden thought of that!
(BTW I think Im completely wrong about sag).
I guess the trend nowadays is to go for forward firing because more drivers have very large soft surrounds & high xmax - maybe something to do with the low Q, low efficiency, low Fs woofers and therefore low Vb.
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th September 2006, 08:15 AM   #20
AndrewT is offline AndrewT  Scotland
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
Hi,
you're allowed ONE. what is the sanction for a second?
__________________
regards Andrew T.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Why did my amp start on fire? soundNERD Chip Amps 39 30th October 2004 04:33 PM
fire up Aleph 30 wijgers Pass Labs 14 28th April 2004 04:42 PM
Amp on fire Ford_V6 Solid State 12 2nd April 2003 01:27 PM
Amp on Fire! peter5 Solid State 6 7th January 2002 12:35 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 04:51 AM.

Page generated in 0.10047 seconds (81.06% PHP - 18.94% MySQL) with 10 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio