|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Vilnius
|
This is my first subwoofer and it is very unsuccessful! It’s no wonder because I did it without any rules or calculations, and the results are very sad. Can you tell me what to do my case? Is it possible to reform the situation or should I forget this box?
Some facts: The driver is very good! I heard it in right box, sounds impressive (not audiophile is more industrial The box is sealed. I’m sure that I hear sub harmonics described in page http://www.arcavia.com/kyle/Equation...26SubHarm.html Or it can be standing waves. So is it possible to make it sound better? Is it possible to avoid standing waves and subharmonics? |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Did it Himself
diyAudio Member
|
Telling us something about the construction of the box and implementation would be useful...
There will not be any standing waves unless your box is has extremely strange dimensions, or your low-pass filter is rubbish. Harmonics indicate a very nasty drive unit or driving the unit into over-excursion or with an underpowered amplifier. I would say that as it's a sealed box there is nothing much you can do that will change sound substantially, so time for a new design. If you put up the Thiele-Small parameters of the driver then people can help you.
__________________
www.readresearch.co.uk my website for UK diy audio people - designs, PCBs, kits and more |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Vilnius
|
Thank you, richie00boy, for your advices. I forgot the picture of my subwoofer. Some parameters of box: internal volume v=142.2 litres or 5.02 kub. Ft3; with foam rubber inside.
Driver’s parameters: Power handling: 600 watts RMS; voice coil diameter: 4"; nominal impedance: 8 ohms; frequency range: 45-1,200 Hz; magnet assembly weight: 15 lbs. Fs=52 Hz; SPL: 92 dB 1W/1m; Vas= 2.2 Ft3; Qms= 4.5; Qes= 0.34; Qts= 0.32; Xmax= 7.5 mm; dimensions - overall diameter = 12-1/4", cutout diameter: 11", mounting depth= 5". Effective moving mass 65 grammes. That’s all I found. I don’t use any filters inside, I just connect an amp throughout the low pass crossover and the sound is not musical at all… it’s like bellow or bump I don’t know even how to describe it… By my opinion it is low subharmonics. One more moment, if I will make this box vented, is it possible to improve the sound? I would like to ask some more questions: Can you tell me is it mater what kind of shape is box, or the main thing is to hold the volume of subwoofer? (I mean right calculated volume, not my case )? And how much percentage deflection in volume is tolerated? Is it true, that I can compensate the volume with special foam? |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Did it Himself
diyAudio Member
|
OK those details make things a lot clearer. I can tell you straightaway that is never going to be much of a subwoofer as Fs is far too high.
As it is at the moment, your box is far, far too big. The good news is that you can add a vent to that box and it will improve matters, but it's still far too big. Half that size would be in the right ballpark although still a little on the large size. I think the bad sound you are getting at the moment is because you are expecting bass out of a poor woofer, and the box is far too big so you're overdriving it at some frequencies. I also suspect your low-pass filter is too shallow slope. Box shape is of little importance for subwoofers, but at the moment yours is so big it might have a small influence. Depending on the density of the foam rubber you have used, it may be good or bad to have inside. My personal opinion is that you should write the project off as a learning experience and start again with a more suitable drive unit. I appreciate that this might be difficult for you in your country or with how much money you have, but you will only ever have a mediocre result if you continue with what you have. Trust me, I have been there and learnt already.
__________________
www.readresearch.co.uk my website for UK diy audio people - designs, PCBs, kits and more |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Switzerland
|
I wouldn't call this one a poor woofer but a poor subwoofer. If you want to use this one for a speaker that goes loud but only down to 60 Hz then Bob's your uncle.
Regards Charles |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Belgrade
|
Khm....
You did it all wrong. Make bass-reflex box, parameters: Vb=55 L (1.94 cu.ft) (netto volume) Fb=52-54 Hz (53 Hz) (tuning frequency of bass-reflex tunnel) Dt=140 mm (diameter of BR tube) Lt=180 mm (BR tube lenght) Good luck. |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Indiana
|
At first blush it looks like it might do very nicely as a TL or horn sub.
mike |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Melbourne, Australia
|
Hey, the box might not be a throw-away article. There's plenty of subs out theere looking for about 140-150 litre sealed boxes, so getting a new driver might be an option as well (depending on your budget, of course).
There's a couple of woofers at Zalytron that would fit the bill at under $100US (Vas over 200l) - but I'm not sure what you've got available locally.
__________________
Jont. "It is impossible to build a fool proof system; because fools are so ingenious." |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Did it Himself
diyAudio Member
|
Yes get a new driver and try and use the existing box, with an added vent.
__________________
www.readresearch.co.uk my website for UK diy audio people - designs, PCBs, kits and more |
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Did it Himself
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
For all the time and effort and materials expended building a TL or horn, it will get slaughtered by a simpler, smaller vented box with a better drive unit.
__________________
www.readresearch.co.uk my website for UK diy audio people - designs, PCBs, kits and more |
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Better dac = worse TV sound? | sharpi31 | Digital Source | 0 | 11th December 2008 09:29 PM |
| Am I the only person that DIDN'T like their B20's ?!? | Nihilist | Full Range | 41 | 4th July 2008 02:38 PM |
| Bad Car Amps Gone Worse... | sousmielie | Car Audio | 25 | 28th June 2008 10:39 AM |
| sacd better/same/worse dvd-a??? | aaronboumans | Digital Source | 20 | 27th February 2007 06:36 PM |
| No, I didn't win the Kentucky Derby | Jocko Homo | The Lounge | 0 | 9th May 2005 02:03 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.10919 seconds (88.67% PHP - 11.33% MySQL) with 11 queries |