How to make sub 'faster' - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Loudspeakers > Subwoofers

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 26th June 2006, 05:29 PM   #1
bvan is offline bvan  Denmark
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Default How to make sub 'faster'

Hi, complete diy newby here.

I'm wondering how one can modify a bought sub to be more musical/tight/fast.

I'm thinking of matching a sealed 12" sub(-3db@25hz) with some fast electrostatics. From my cursory reading it seems that Q is the issue? Is it all about "critically dampening" the sub or is there more to it than this? What numbers should I be aiming for?

What, if anything, could I as a novice do to tighten up the sub? I have friend who is an EE so if there is something to be done involving the PCB then please also let me know.

I should also say that I am happy to sacrifice some ectention(say 30hz) and lots of output to achieve my end.(I dont listen over 80db).

Thanks for any help.

b.
  Reply With Quote
Old 26th June 2006, 06:06 PM   #2
Did it Himself
diyAudio Member
 
richie00boy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Gloucestershire, England, UK
It's not a lot really to do with Q, especially if the box is sealed. The factor is integration - the low-pass filter.
__________________
www.readresearch.co.uk my website for UK diy audio people - designs, PCBs, kits and more.
  Reply With Quote
Old 26th June 2006, 06:24 PM   #3
sreten is offline sreten  United Kingdom
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK
Default Re: How to make sub 'faster'

Quote:
Originally posted by bvan

What, if anything, could I as a novice do to tighten up the sub?
b.
Hi,

Investigate the stuffing of the subwoofer. Depends on the driver
and the current type of fill and its density. increasing stuffing will
tighten bass though as said integration of the sub and the
electrostatics is also critical.

/sreten.
  Reply With Quote
Old 26th June 2006, 06:57 PM   #4
bvan is offline bvan  Denmark
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Thanks for that.

I have a BFD if that helps with intergration? I take it you mean that the subs and speakers roll-off slopes must be such that there are no holes or humps?

So increasing the stuffing inside the speakers would help? Why do manufacturers skimp on this i.e what is the tradeoff of putting too much dampening material in the enclosure?

cheers

b.
  Reply With Quote
Old 26th June 2006, 07:03 PM   #5
Did it Himself
diyAudio Member
 
richie00boy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Gloucestershire, England, UK
If you stuff it too much it reduces the effectiveness of the stuffing.
__________________
www.readresearch.co.uk my website for UK diy audio people - designs, PCBs, kits and more.
  Reply With Quote
Old 26th June 2006, 08:43 PM   #6
bvan is offline bvan  Denmark
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
last question,

what will happen if a take a saw to it and make it a bit smaller?

cheers

b.
  Reply With Quote
Old 26th June 2006, 08:50 PM   #7
Did it Himself
diyAudio Member
 
richie00boy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Gloucestershire, England, UK
Q will raise making a peakier response and worse group delay, and low-extension will reduce. Power handling will be improved provided you have not reached the voice coil thermal limit.

Bear in mind that changing Qts from e.g. 0.7 to 0.9 is only quite suttle.
__________________
www.readresearch.co.uk my website for UK diy audio people - designs, PCBs, kits and more.
  Reply With Quote
Old 26th June 2006, 10:05 PM   #8
bvan is offline bvan  Denmark
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
I think I found what I'm looking for! Will start from scratch:


http://www.customanalogue.com/sub_index.htm


A "critical Q" sub, Q=0.5, designed for music not HT.

What you guys think? look easy enough to build.

cheers for the help,

b
  Reply With Quote
Old 26th June 2006, 10:38 PM   #9
diyAudio Member
 
RobWells's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: UK
Desisions... Desisions...


Will add that the peerless drivers are meant to be fantastic drivers, just be wary of believing all on the critical q site. Esp. the measurement bits.



Rob.
  Reply With Quote
Old 26th June 2006, 10:49 PM   #10
lndm is offline lndm  Australia
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: nsw
I wonder what exactly you mean when you say tight. A well designed woofer with a Q of 0.5 should indeed give you tight bass.

This bass might be accurate, gentle and articulate (for want of a good set of descriptive words). It will play well with most types of music.

However, if you listen to much rock music, or anything with a bit of sting, you might favour something different. Perhaps a system with a higher Q, and an amp with a high damping factor maybe.

FWIW, I use a low Q setup and find all music listening enjoyable.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
ways to discharge a mosfet faster jegandren Power Supplies 9 20th July 2008 08:05 PM
need drivers to be faster than outputs (all bjt)? h_a Solid State 10 15th April 2008 12:35 PM
faster transistors yugaaa Solid State 27 10th January 2005 03:23 PM
Linux calls 60 times faster than IE Lars Clausen Everything Else 4 17th October 2004 03:58 PM
Is faster better ? Alien8 Digital Source 8 5th March 2004 06:02 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 06:42 AM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2