|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Bologna
|
Hi, I'm planning to build a sub, and I came across two driver from peerless:
Peerless SLS-12 http://www.tymphany.com/datasheet/printview.php?id=38 Peerless CC-260 http://www.tymphany.com/datasheet/printview.php?id=191 From a quick simulation with winISD they both reach low F3. I don't have problem of building big cabinet and neither of space. I'm going to use the sub with a pair of B&W monitor. What driver should I buy? wich has the best quality? from what I see the SLS series is a raplacement of the Classic series, right? thank you very much |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Belgrade
|
Active or passive?
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
The second driver appears to have been discontinued.
__________________
Any technology sufficiently advanced is indistinguishable from magic |
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Belgrade
|
Quote:
I would go for closed box. 1. Vc=75 L for Qtc=0.71 Fc=49 Hz 2. Vc=95 L for Qtc=0.6 Fc=45 Hz 3. Vc=125 L for Qtc=0.5 Fc=41.5 Hz Try 2. Vc=95 L, x-over 12dB/oct. at 75-80 Hz. It could be something about 87-88 dB/1W/1m. Monitors should be less. If its not, with this unit, you must go on bass-reflex (90-91 dB) or active. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Bologna
|
I made some simulation with lspcad lite:
for the first driver 309 liters with 2 reflex tube 10cm diamater 16cm long, so it goes around 21hz for the second 131 liters reflex tube 10cm diameter and 26cm long and so we're again near 20hz it's active, I already found a good amplifier with 100w on 8ohm Quote:
If the quality is equal or very similar naturally I would choose the first because it's bigger, and it's newer and if I'll broke it( but I don't think so) I will get better support. thank you to all |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Belgrade
|
Quote:
Did you see anywhere/anytime 310 L bass-reflex box with 30 cm bass? If you go with BR: Vb=110L, Fb=28.5-29.5 Hz, Dt=100 mm, Lt=160-190mm. Don"t ask how I calculate this. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Spain
|
I have the SLS12 in a closed box of 86 liters and my measurements are a f-6 of 27 Hz
The sound is very good and natural Do you have an especial interest in BR? Regards ( and sorry for my english) Miguel |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Bologna
|
Thank you Miguel for sharing your experience, finally I found someone who tested on ears these speaker.
I ordered the SLS 10. well, I have special interest for BR because I can get lower F3. But If I can get F3 30hz with a closed I would be happy, but I think it's impossible. |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| How good is Peerless 850136 as sub driver? | goldyrathore | Subwoofers | 12 | 14th April 2011 09:02 PM |
| enclosure suggestions for peerless driver | BWRX | Subwoofers | 13 | 18th November 2008 03:00 AM |
| What think about peerless PPB driver | Idefixes | Multi-Way | 21 | 8th September 2008 12:08 PM |
| Peerless Driver Choices Woe | fishball79 | Multi-Way | 11 | 5th July 2003 11:56 PM |
| sub using Peerless driver | trespasser_guy | Multi-Way | 7 | 25th March 2003 05:17 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.09748 seconds (86.50% PHP - 13.50% MySQL) with 10 queries |