|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
  |
|
|
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
1st May 2006, 09:58 AM
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Sydney
|
Peerless 830846/830842 Subs
Has anyone used either the Peerless 830846 or 830842 10" subs? I can't decide whether to use either the 830846 in a vented box or use the 830842 with a PR as per the peerless application notes.
Also has anyone built any of these subs as detailed on the Peerless website? Any feedback on either of these subs would be appreciated. |
|
|
1st May 2006, 11:40 AM
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Newcastle, Australia
|
If you choose the 830846, make sure you have the amplification that is stable into 3 ohms.
The 830842 doesn't have the same problem but does dip to 3.9 ohm so any 4 ohm stable amp would suffice.
__________________
No longer DIY active |
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Seas Excel, Peerless HDS, Tang Band subs, Fostex supertweets | audiokinesis | Swap Meet | 8 | 14th September 2010 01:26 AM |
| various dayton rs, seas, peerless hds, subs for sale | sqlkev | Swap Meet | 6 | 10th December 2007 12:27 AM |
| Brand new Peerless XLS10 subs £50 each | ShinOBIWAN | Swap Meet | 8 | 29th July 2007 08:49 PM |
| WTB Peerless XLS subs | e30m3 | Swap Meet | 0 | 21st June 2006 06:26 AM |
| Finished my 10" Peerless XXLS subs | David Gatti | Subwoofers | 22 | 29th December 2005 09:22 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.05698 seconds (70.93% PHP - 29.07% MySQL) with 10 queries |
