Go Back   Home > Forums > >
Home Forums Rules Articles diyAudio Store Blogs Gallery Wiki Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

impulse response vs. enclosure size
impulse response vs. enclosure size
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 17th February 2006, 08:13 PM   #1
East is offline East  Germany
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Stuttgart
Default impulse response vs. enclosure size

Hi guys,

I am new here and want to build an active subwoofer with a sealed
enclosure. Going to use a Hypex UCD400 and Mivoc HCM 12 T.

Trying to get the best possible result I am not sure if there is a big
difference between Qtc=0,579(75l) and Qtc=0675(45l) for the impulse
response in regard to suitable enclosure sizes?

Has the sound, the perfect accuracy if I would have the “perfect”
impulse response, however I can achieve that?

Thank you in advance for any help!

Peace, Andy

Simulation with WinISD:
  Reply With Quote
Old 17th February 2006, 09:48 PM   #2
Volenti is offline Volenti  Australia
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Australia
Well you are going to hurt your impulse response more with the subsonic filter, the eq boost (which natural room gain will do some of the work there) and the native Le of the subs voicecoil, which I'm guessing is around 2.5mH+ by the graph then any minor enclosure volume changes.

I would personally choose a middle ground of ~60L and experiment with with fill.

Also the in-room response will vary wildly with location, room treatments/lack there of and phase relitave to the mains.
  Reply With Quote
Old 17th February 2006, 09:49 PM   #3
Ron E is offline Ron E  United States
diyAudio Member
Ron E's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: USA, MN
You will notice very little difference between the two alignments.
The first thing you would notice is the box size difference, and you will naturally think the larger one goes deeper, even if it doesn't The mind is a crazy thing.

People often think they can tell, but even the difference between impulse/frequency response for Qtc=0.5 and 0.7 is very small. 1.0 starts to get a little tubby, but even 1.3 sounds OK with most music.

Modeled Impulse response isn't necessarily what corresponds with tight or accurate bass, anyway. Low distortion and having a response that matches the room well is arguably much more important.
Our species needs, and deserves, a citizenry with minds wide awake and a basic understanding of how the world works. --Carl Sagan
Armaments, universal debt, and planned obsolescence--those are the three pillars of Western prosperity. —Aldous Huxley
  Reply With Quote
Old 18th February 2006, 09:01 AM   #4
East is offline East  Germany
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Stuttgart
Thanks for your help!

I guess I have a bettter understanding for the problem now.
  Reply With Quote
Old 21st February 2006, 04:38 PM   #5
ChristianThomas is offline ChristianThomas  United Kingdom
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: On a hill, in a wooden shack, next to the woods, in Somerset.

I would go for the Qt = 0.58 without hesitation. This is almost exactly a Bessel alignment (I presume this is why you chose it). My experience with subwoofers is that they tend to carry a single characteristic to their sound irrespective of the filtering you use. That's not to say that some filtering isn't better than others, only that this signature pervades every alignment. The other thing is that the lower you can get the resonance, the less sensitive the ear is, and the less the effect of any stored energy will be. That means it is less likely to be heard.

In terms of impulse response, the optimum is a Q of 0.5 so you will get marginally more ringing than none. But the Bessel has the advantage of zero group delay over a wider area; to a higher frequency. To some extent one might be able to say that the transient response is better because a group (or burst) of frequencies all get their reactions at the same time.

Though the truth is that it is the integration into the rest of your system that will be the major factor in determining the impulse response, a Bessel is not a bad place to start. Since you say you are a beginner, I would suggest carrying this simplicity to the low pass filtering too and use a second order bessel there also. This is a good, practical, filiter shape. I like symmetry in filter sections.

If the drive unit breaks up badly higher up, then add another section of filters. A good idea for this is to do it at the same frequency as the bass unit you are combining with - if you have a 3 way loudspeaker. For a two way speaker this frequency would be too high and it forces the design back into your court as to what you would chose to use to get rid of this mess. Because you don't have an ideal, or near ideal, to aim for, my recommendation would be to follow old fashioned filter theory and get rid of it as quickly as possible; one of the less extreme Chebyshevs might be where I would start. The aim here would be to keep things as they were as far as possible, and then switch it off.

Hope this helps

Kind regards

  Reply With Quote
Old 23rd February 2006, 12:53 PM   #6
Artmaster is offline Artmaster  Ukraine
diyAudio Member
Artmaster's Avatar
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Kiev
impulse response vs. enclosure size
I think it's absolutely different drivers, that's why it should sound different either.
even the same model a few pcs has differens.
and you can force ones working for choosing box, but any has optimal for your room, another optimum for your opinion, for your favorite phonation.
I think all of DIY'ers looking for something personally - design, sounding.
should you get absolutely same responce from 10" in 50 liters and 12" in 70 litres - anyone will be able to catch sight of sound.
it's seems like - "ideal system" is impossible looks like true.
Artmaster live in www.artmaydan.org.ua
  Reply With Quote


impulse response vs. enclosure sizeHide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Loudspeaker impulse response optimization thadman Multi-Way 7 18th April 2009 04:42 PM
Direct Impulse Response measurements jzagaja Multi-Way 33 4th October 2007 11:33 AM
Impulse response differences Sjef Multi-Way 6 28th August 2005 08:43 PM

New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 12:00 PM.

Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2018 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Resources saved on this page: MySQL 16.67%
vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2018 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright ©1999-2018 diyAudio