|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#11 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: india
|
hi Ron thanx for the reply. Frankly speaking this is first "serious" box i am designing (actually finished
1. if it is placed face down, wont the reflection from the ground cause distortion?. Will the efficency be reduced. 2. If the vent is in the rear wont it increase the time delay and phase? These are some of the doubt that came to my mind while going thru your reply. I am asking these questions out of curiosity thanx in advance, Venki. |
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Québec, Québec
|
1. Efficiency will not be reduced, you'll not get much distortion.
2. You could get significant time delay if you plan to use a crossover at 500 Hz or so... if you stay under 100 Hz, you'll not have a problem with this.
__________________
DIYaudio for President ! |
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: india
|
Hi again,
Thanx to all, I did try out the rear firing and the down firing modes. I found out the keeping the port firing down decreased the booming sound and also the noise (thanx to all) (actually the box is constructed such that when the port is firing down/up the speaker inside the box is vertical so i think this can also contribute the problem i faced). I would also like to know the height(min/max) of the port's mouth from the ground (currently i hav placed the box on a small chair (about 20cm high) i need to replace this with a permenant stand). I am yet to measure the response fully (I did measure the impedance i found it to be closer to what i designed (Fl between 30 and 35hz Fh between 70 and 80 hz) Thanx in advance. Venki. |
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: USA, MN
|
2 port diameters should be sufficient. Much less and the air under the box will act as an extension of the port and lower the tuning frequency. You can measure whether or not this shift occurs in your situation, and account for it by shortening the duct somewhat.
__________________
Our species needs, and deserves, a citizenry with minds wide awake and a basic understanding of how the world works. --Carl Sagan Science is a way of thinking much more than it is a body of knowledge. --Carl Sagan |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Measuring Frequency Response | MCPete | Multi-Way | 10 | 10th February 2009 12:36 AM |
| Measuring Frequency Response | furly | Planars & Exotics | 1 | 17th March 2006 06:59 AM |
| Measuring Subwoofer Response | Bose(o) | Subwoofers | 14 | 14th October 2004 11:00 PM |
| Measuring the frequency response of a mic? | mr_push_pull | Multi-Way | 5 | 30th August 2004 12:26 PM |
| measuring frequency response | bonsai171 | Multi-Way | 8 | 18th February 2004 07:29 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.06873 seconds (75.62% PHP - 24.38% MySQL) with 10 queries |