|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Articles | Links | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
|
We're saving for a new server - help us to serve you by Donating Today and become a friend with benefits!
Ads on/off / Custom Title / 2009 Tshirt / More PMs / Bigger Images / Advanced printing |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#11 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Wellington
|
Id be more concerned with some kind of ignition (although it wouldnt be likely to happen if it was vacuumed then filled with helium)
You'd have to have a different method of sealing, id imagine - most glues are porous to a point (much like vinyl tubing is, but it doesnt 'leak' persay) so you'd have to have some kind of container inside the unit to stop it from leaking over time (unless you want to regas your sub... bahaha, classic) |
|
|
|
#12 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: New Brunswick
|
1. the surround of your woofer leaks air, which makes it impossible to do this.
2. if you could stop the surround of your woofer from leaking air, a sort of nozzle sealed into the side of the box that has an adapter for attaching to a canister of compressed gas might be an easy way to put the gas in, but then you could never fill it completely with the desires gas,, just more and more. also, has anyone thought about what pressurizing the air behind the woofer would do, (it the surround dind't leak air) i have a feeling that it would change something, thanks for reading
__________________
My 100$ (final cost) line arrays will blow you away |
|
|
|
#13 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Columbus, OH
|
You could put two nozzles on it. One for putting the air in and the other for letting the air inside out. Granted, it would take a LONG time to reach even 95% of the kind of gas you want, but it would work.
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
pressurizing the air behind the driver would cause the cone to move out and it would kill the driver's performance.
__________________
The golden rule of DIY: Build nice, or build twice! |
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
frugal-phile(tm)
diyAudio Moderator
|
Quote:
With Helium you'd need to build a much bigger box. dave
__________________
community sites t-linespeakers.org, frugal-horn.com ........ commercial site planet10-HiFi |
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Well, give it enough pressure and you would have a dome instead of a cone
If you pressurize the gas inside, you would have to do something to keep the voicecoil in the gap. Some kind of springloading maybe. It will stiffen the whole system and the resonant frequency goes up, and sensitivity goes down. What about loosely filling a gastight thin bag with gas inside the box? Then you could even have a BR or TL without thinking about gas leaks. |
|
|
|
#17 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: New Brunswick
|
If the speed of sound is 7:1 in helium:air
and if that means the box would have to be seven times bigger with helium in it. Who can do the calculations on a very practical gas. who can figure out what the ratio would be for something that makes sound travel slower imagine the possibilitie's in a car audio invironment, just think. When designing a driver, you want it to be sensitive, work in a small box, and handle lots of power. im no expert, but i've been told that you cant have all three. something had to give. as if it were some sort of a trade off between the three. So if you eliminate the need of working in a small box, you would not need to make a tradeoff on box size, you could focus all your drivers potential in the other areas, Think about combining this design theory in a driver with FEA(finite element analysis), the driver would be the single best driver in production. and who better to make the driver then Eminence, They could do the whole thing Just a thought, Thanks
__________________
My 100$ (final cost) line arrays will blow you away |
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Rotterdam, NL
|
Sulfurhexafluoride is oderless and inflammable, so no problems there (could have found that out yourself btw).
It is also a fairly large molecule so it wouldn't leak that much as air would. Some speakers would be unsuitable because of their surround or dustcap, however a rubber surround would be less sensitive for leakage. Quote:
Even if it would form a mixture the effect would be very noticeable since the speed of sound in SF6 is much lower as the speed of sound in air. Wkr Johan |
|
|
|
|
#19 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
__________________
The golden rule of DIY: Build nice, or build twice! |
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: New Brunswick
|
haha,,
i was hoping someone would help me out with that statement,
__________________
My 100$ (final cost) line arrays will blow you away |
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| build my first full ranger,let's build another one:a small fullrange high end pc-spea | then_dude | Full Range | 2 | 30th November 2005 08:54 AM |
| Do i need to build main supply (240v) filter?Or build power distribution? | thomgun_lc | Chip Amps | 9 | 16th September 2005 10:52 AM |
| build or buy | navin | Multi-Way | 9 | 16th November 2004 05:36 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.35168695 seconds (56.83% PHP - 43.17% MySQL) with 11 queries |