Go Back   Home > Forums > Loudspeakers > Subwoofers
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 20th September 2005, 07:16 PM   #1
tade is offline tade  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Ralieigh nc
Send a message via AIM to tade
Default tade no subwoofer.

I am looking to build a ported sub with good extention. I live in a concrete box of a dorm room so i figure room gain should be taken into consideration. I am torn between:
http://www.partsexpress.com/pe/pshow...5&ctab=10#Tabs
and
http://www.partsexpress.com/pe/pshow...0&ctab=10#Tabs

And if you told me this was a good investment.... I might consider it.
http://www.partsexpress.com/pe/pshow...99-665&scqty=1

Because they are both cheap and seem to be able to move a lot of air. the dayton dvc comes higly recommended, i like the dvc.
Should i plan for room gain? I was thinking making the port variable length.

Right now i just need a driver so i can sink my teeth into the project, please help!

Many thanks
  Reply With Quote
Old 20th September 2005, 08:37 PM   #2
DcibeL is offline DcibeL  Canada
diyAudio Member
 
DcibeL's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Saskatchewan
How about one of these?

High fidelity
High Output
__________________
The power of Science compels you!
  Reply With Quote
Old 20th September 2005, 08:40 PM   #3
tade is offline tade  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Ralieigh nc
Send a message via AIM to tade
the first link is broken i think, and the second is a single voice coil. I think haveing a dvc would simplify things. though, my amp does have a bridged mode.
  Reply With Quote
Old 20th September 2005, 08:46 PM   #4
DcibeL is offline DcibeL  Canada
diyAudio Member
 
DcibeL's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Saskatchewan
Fixed the first link. Basically the high fidelity sub is made to work in a sealed box, while the high output is made to work in a ported box (I think). I cannot recommend that big buyout driver, from what I have read it is built for high SPL and not high quality sound. For the price a much better sub could be bought. If you wanted to spend that much money I would have to recommend the Peerless XXLS 830847. It is a dual 8 ohm voice coil subwoofer for ported boxes and sells for $164 at madisound.
__________________
The power of Science compels you!
  Reply With Quote
Old 20th September 2005, 09:06 PM   #5
tade is offline tade  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Ralieigh nc
Send a message via AIM to tade
this will be a better performer than the dayton dvc 12?
I also really like the idea of a sealed box, but i really dont want to get into bass boost circuitry. I think i am scared. Plus, ported ought to give me better efficiency down low. then again, a sealed box can be made small and solid, and with a high enough power woofer and the proper circuitry can go low too. Is the bass boost ciurcuit very complex?

thanks for the help!
  Reply With Quote
Old 21st September 2005, 01:45 PM   #6
tade is offline tade  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Ralieigh nc
Send a message via AIM to tade
I am really feelin that hi fidelity subwoofer. I think i am going to go for it because when i continue building my soundsystem, stereo bass might be something i am interested in, and i think these drivers seem quite nice.

I am paying around with Winisd, and have two options in mind. I can build a large box suitable for anechoic bass which is close to flat to 21hz with a minus three at 17hz, or i can give myself a long slow rolloff with a minus three at 21hz. How should i decide to go? should i do the rolling one and count on room gain? The nice low tuning frequency required might help dampen rumble frequencies.

thanks
  Reply With Quote
Old 21st September 2005, 02:55 PM   #7
DcibeL is offline DcibeL  Canada
diyAudio Member
 
DcibeL's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Saskatchewan
I do believe the new Dayton reference subwoofers are very hard to beat for the price. They provide a very good competition to the Peerless XXLS for a less cost. Since you are in a dorm room I would go for the slow rolloff as a small room will have quite a bit of "room gain" over a larger room.

I believe the bass boost circuitry you are referring to is a Linkwitz Transform circuit, which unless you are experienced with electronics I would stay away from it. A nice ported box is always a good start.

In my system I use an Atlas 12" with a long slow rolloff to get better bass extension, and it sounds just great in room.
__________________
The power of Science compels you!
  Reply With Quote
Old 21st September 2005, 05:12 PM   #8
tade is offline tade  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Ralieigh nc
Send a message via AIM to tade
excellent, wood is cheap, i am gonna do it!

I have heard that you shouldnt stuff a port. but i think i may be able to use that in tuning. can i stuff a port to allow me tune from between twenty five and fifteen hz? or will the stuffing be more of a between 20.5-19? Also, do you thin it would be too much of a leap of faith to make the box 40% smaller and stuff it? i figure a smaller box will be stronger.
  Reply With Quote
Old 21st September 2005, 05:46 PM   #9
DcibeL is offline DcibeL  Canada
diyAudio Member
 
DcibeL's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Saskatchewan
Someone else will have to help you with the port stuffing question, but I believe stuffing a port will have more of an effect of an aperiodic vent on a sealed box, rather than changing the tuning. I could be wrong though, as I haven't looked into it.

40% smaller is overkill for the effects of stuffing a box. Something like 20% seems more realistic to me. I have never seen anyone heavily stuff a ported box, so I think it is safe to say it's not the best idea. I have always padded the walls of my (ported) sub boxes with polyfill, but nothing more than that. A large box can be just as strong as a small box provided it is properly braced internally.
__________________
The power of Science compels you!
  Reply With Quote
Old 22nd September 2005, 09:21 AM   #10
Volenti is offline Volenti  Australia
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Australia
Quote:
Originally posted by tade
excellent, wood is cheap, i am gonna do it!

I have heard that you shouldnt stuff a port. but i think i may be able to use that in tuning. can i stuff a port to allow me tune from between twenty five and fifteen hz? or will the stuffing be more of a between 20.5-19? Also, do you thin it would be too much of a leap of faith to make the box 40% smaller and stuff it? i figure a smaller box will be stronger.
Stuffing the port or the box won't allow you to tune the response the way you think, it will damp the resonance of the port/box system, reducing the output of the of the port at resonance.

It's usefull for taming the response of a boomy sounding enclosure, but won't change the tuning frequency.

Stuffing does not make the enclosure appear larger to the driver, it changes the damping and roll off of the driver to be similar to a larger enclosure but with reduced efficiency.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Tade no Pioneer tade Analogue Source 2 12th January 2009 04:50 PM
New design from Tade! tade Multi-Way 7 14th July 2007 11:29 PM
Tade no 2-way! tade Multi-Way 0 5th May 2006 02:36 AM
tade no esl tade Planars & Exotics 35 11th September 2005 05:36 PM
tade no bookshelf tade Multi-Way 10 5th September 2005 03:16 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 02:56 AM.

Page generated in 0.10364 seconds (83.82% PHP - 16.18% MySQL) with 11 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio