Go Back   Home > Forums > Loudspeakers > Subwoofers
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 26th August 2005, 09:05 AM   #11
nniwelt is offline nniwelt  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
I have looked for a long time to get this photo, cause I was wondering how this box is made. Eventually this image came from EAW promo materials.

*** Image removed at members request - Vikash
  Reply With Quote
Old 26th August 2005, 11:09 AM   #12
qi is offline qi
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: .
Quote:
Originally posted by GM
Greets!

You can't scale horns this way, any more than you can a sealed or vented cab, unless of course you want Fl, Fh to be much higher.

GM
Thanks for the clarification, Greg.

Use a scale factor of .625, not .5 to get the original Jensen Imperial dimensions. The original design uses a 15" driver, not a 12".

Quote:
I have looked for a long time to get this photo, cause I was wondering how this box is made. Eventually this image came from EAW promo materials.
I see no image...
  Reply With Quote
Old 26th August 2005, 01:05 PM   #13
GM is offline GM  United States
diyAudio Member
 
GM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Chamblee, Ga.
Greets!

One more time..... you can't scale a cab this way and expect similar performance! Anyway, Steve's design is enough different from the original that he shouldn't be referring to it as an 'Imperial' IMO: http://www.highefficiencyloudspeaker...l_Build-in.jpg

GM
__________________
Loud is Beautiful if it's Clean! As always though, the usual disclaimers apply to this post's contents.
  Reply With Quote
Old 26th August 2005, 02:32 PM   #14
qi is offline qi
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: .
GM

Yes and no...

I am just using simple math to scale a "super-sized" design back to its original state.

The plans you posted are the originals, and known to be flawed and very difficult to work with.

Actually the website you reference confirms this.

Steve's plans are easier and more "buildable" IMO
  Reply With Quote
Old 26th August 2005, 05:10 PM   #15
nniwelt is offline nniwelt  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
qi
You see image now?
  Reply With Quote
Old 26th August 2005, 06:08 PM   #16
qi is offline qi
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: .
Norbert

Yes, thank you.

At a quick glance, it looks "doable". The expansion rate almost looks linear -- (consisting of expanding straight sides).

The two curved folds could be made of thin veneer, back-filled with "great stuff" (pvc foam) for rigidity and damping (essentially what they describe)

The initial flare is at a perpendicular plane to the main flare, but also appears to be linear (expanding straight sides)

It looks like a single driver may be an option, also.

But the thing is a monster (approx 5' x 3' x 3') -- not easily portable (unless you look like THE ROCK)
  Reply With Quote
Old 29th August 2005, 04:43 AM   #17
mike.e is offline mike.e  New Zealand
diyAudio Member
 
mike.e's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: NZ
Send a message via ICQ to mike.e Send a message via MSN to mike.e
Quote:
Originally posted by qi
Norbert

Yes, thank you.

At a quick glance, it looks "doable". The expansion rate almost looks linear -- (consisting of expanding straight sides).

The two curved folds could be made of thin veneer, back-filled with "great stuff" (pvc foam) for rigidity and damping (essentially what they describe)

The initial flare is at a perpendicular plane to the main flare, but also appears to be linear (expanding straight sides)

It looks like a single driver may be an option, also.

But the thing is a monster (approx 5' x 3' x 3') -- not easily portable (unless you look like THE ROCK)
The eaw cabinet is simple.The fancy foam may help resonance of panels. The curvings wont help it in its passband.

The series of parabolic/conical expansions approximate an exponential or hyperbolic flare. Probably 4-8units required for stated sensitivity and cutoff.

Marketing ploys use a cover of mystical magic to make a unit appear advantagous to buy. Its probably similar to the labhorn. Easier to make too!!
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
dual folded horn plans bacon665 Subwoofers 21 24th June 2009 03:45 AM
Peavey FH-2 FH2 FH1 FH-1 Folded Horn info X-Ray plans please! Peavey MB1 MB-2 Multi-Way 0 6th February 2006 03:50 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 02:52 AM.

Page generated in 0.08651 seconds (78.68% PHP - 21.32% MySQL) with 11 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio