|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#11 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
|
I have looked for a long time to get this photo, cause I was wondering how this box is made. Eventually this image came from EAW promo materials.
*** Image removed at members request - Vikash |
|
|
|
|
#12 | ||
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: .
|
Quote:
Use a scale factor of .625, not .5 to get the original Jensen Imperial dimensions. The original design uses a 15" driver, not a 12". Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Chamblee, Ga.
|
Greets!
One more time..... you can't scale a cab this way and expect similar performance! Anyway, Steve's design is enough different from the original that he shouldn't be referring to it as an 'Imperial' IMO: http://www.highefficiencyloudspeaker...l_Build-in.jpg GM
__________________
Loud is Beautiful if it's Clean! As always though, the usual disclaimers apply to this post's contents. |
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: .
|
GM
Yes and no... I am just using simple math to scale a "super-sized" design back to its original state. The plans you posted are the originals, and known to be flawed and very difficult to work with. Actually the website you reference confirms this. Steve's plans are easier and more "buildable" IMO |
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
|
qi
You see image now? |
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: .
|
Norbert
Yes, thank you. At a quick glance, it looks "doable". The expansion rate almost looks linear -- (consisting of expanding straight sides). The two curved folds could be made of thin veneer, back-filled with "great stuff" (pvc foam) for rigidity and damping (essentially what they describe) The initial flare is at a perpendicular plane to the main flare, but also appears to be linear (expanding straight sides) It looks like a single driver may be an option, also. But the thing is a monster (approx 5' x 3' x 3') -- not easily portable (unless you look like THE ROCK) |
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
The series of parabolic/conical expansions approximate an exponential or hyperbolic flare. Probably 4-8units required for stated sensitivity and cutoff. Marketing ploys use a cover of mystical magic to make a unit appear advantagous to buy. Its probably similar to the labhorn. Easier to make too!! |
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| dual folded horn plans | bacon665 | Subwoofers | 21 | 24th June 2009 03:45 AM |
| Peavey FH-2 FH2 FH1 FH-1 Folded Horn info X-Ray plans please! | Peavey MB1 MB-2 | Multi-Way | 0 | 6th February 2006 03:50 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.08651 seconds (78.68% PHP - 21.32% MySQL) with 11 queries |