|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
I scavenged a piece of PVC pipe 7.5 inched inner diameter and two feet long. Massive, and expensive if i were to buy it myself. so i am stoked, imagind how kick *** a sub port you would put your head into would be.
Is it useable at all? what kind of monster specs would my driver need? thanks |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Austin
|
Increasing port diameter is usually done to reduce port noise. Unless you are moving a LOT of air at VERY low frequencies, this will be a pretty nifty enclosure for a small sub, but not a good port for a mid-size sub.
When I say a LOT of air, I am thinking rock-concert loud. Or louder.
__________________
Jesus loves you. |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
It's definitely useable
Be warned, large PVC ports have a seductive nature that can sneak up on you.... You will find that a large dia pipe needs a large box. Here are some figures (sorry about the metric..) for a port 187.5mm dia and 600mm long: a tuning frequency of 35hz requires a box size of 111 litres a tuning frequency of 27hz requires a box size of 154 litres a tuning frequency of 20hz requires a box size of 300 litres pipe resonance 286hz I have built a dual 10inch sub with a pair of 6inch ports in a 130 litre box tuned to 28hz. With 240w applied, this runs with a peak airspeed of a very conservative 8 metres/sec. A single 7.5 inch port would have run at around 11 m/sec (although it would have needed to be about 1060mm long) If you flare both ends, I would guess that you could run up to a pair of twelves with about 300w total. Look for drivers with an Xmax of around 10mm, which will be happy in about 80-150litres each. regards Collo
__________________
Ports rule! |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
collo, seductive in what way?
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
You have to ask me?
You've only just acquired it, and already you're trying to fit your head into it! I think it might be too late for you.....
__________________
Ports rule! |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
haha yeah, though ill have to get my head around it before i can do anything useful.
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
very usefull piece of material if youu have say, a pair of high excursion 15s, and wanna tune em low.
__________________
CREEEAAAAAMMMMM CHEEEEEESSSSSSEEEEEEE!!!!! EEEEESSSSEEEEEEHC MMMMMAAAAAEEEERRCCC!!!! |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
u could try using it as an enclosure for a pair of 8" sealed and sub on each end or u could biuld it like the bazoka subs in car audio
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
i was biking around town again tonight...
scored a piece with an ID of twelve inches and three feet in length. i think this may be obsessive... |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Austin
|
The best way to fight OCD is to deny the urges...
The best way to use that pipe is as a subwoofer enclosure.
__________________
Jesus loves you. |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| FS: Large inductors, Large Ports, and Leaky Holes | luvdunhill | Swap Meet | 10 | 6th March 2009 03:01 PM |
| Slot port vs circular port equivalence | Brisso57 | Multi-Way | 12 | 21st February 2009 02:38 PM |
| Large Cone/large VC or several medium sized cones / medium VCs | vajolet | Multi-Way | 14 | 3rd December 2007 06:10 PM |
| Single Port Vent Better than Dual Port? | Daveis | Multi-Way | 18 | 15th July 2007 05:12 AM |
| To port or not to port? Newbie with newly built mains | starquake | Multi-Way | 1 | 18th December 2004 12:51 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.10750 seconds (82.41% PHP - 17.59% MySQL) with 11 queries |